From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A89EC433FE for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D973CCBC0 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:07:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D2223CCBAD for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:07:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DF822CDDF for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:07:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CCA01F8CA; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:07:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1669043264; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MQQbRHsYyBapqPqvWkZTobY98oVz14zU381g1rDutX4=; b=DE6tG8RggAfOP1cK6JOa4I8Gwye1TUyWk2NuQZxjXMyUk/DrGLK5twv4kwYo04Wuqvfa1s uH+iVu2S6+M7g9mNwcbErSMsP7pZUqWlCd7wKHyPavxwIRLeKqqs8QxCBRNp9nPJU/9cVN 3xRdAympa0svpozkVKds6LcBEul6cxI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1669043264; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MQQbRHsYyBapqPqvWkZTobY98oVz14zU381g1rDutX4=; b=1GZtnHhNFdaNYFrUsTVgBrLs2eLqDMOqEwhPk7bUWGdYJGdtKBOj4rWgf4cHFDcXo7qMua 6IeDbnnkjFy7qYAQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743DF1376E; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id X/oPGkCUe2PwMwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:07:44 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:09:07 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Richard Palethorpe Message-ID: References: <20221121144505.1496-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221121144505.1496-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] config: Explicitly set gnu99 X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Jan Kara Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Use the GNU variant of the C99 language to stop GCC 4.8.5 defaulting > to C90. > > We can't use C99 because LTP is far from compliant. I woder if this would work with different compilers. I suppose clang does work, but what about icc? I supose that we get tons of 'can't do pointer arithmetics on void* pointers and stuff' with plain c99. Maybe it would be better to clean these out instead. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp