From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF2EC4332F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ox9FC-0005J1-LC; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:02:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ox9F9-0005II-Hl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:02:00 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ox9F2-0004nm-41 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:01:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669046511; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DoY7E0NlYewfrflBQjU41cLatH2XrISuX9oqDnVhi9k=; b=SIIhZK4ZxibPqbroCURjlfgcKboL8+IjorirP2+Lji2USMh9+lwj680FOZ+gOKQSsPAfXD A7Gbo89z47fPy0YQ4+ZOqx7oMSObc8j0wEOESl7RXBhLZRuyDVhI8GdRG57qLasoeAhdD1 vfgTpep1foyQ7jDp41nE30yxgkqdytc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-203-RFib2cX5MQekAa2zQA2VLQ-1; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:01:45 -0500 X-MC-Unique: RFib2cX5MQekAa2zQA2VLQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5113811E7A; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.39.194.221]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABF3D492CA2; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:01:40 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz , John Snow , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , Eric Blake , Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] block/vmdk: add missing coroutine_fn annotations Message-ID: References: <20221116122241.2856527-1-eesposit@redhat.com> <20221116122241.2856527-8-eesposit@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221116122241.2856527-8-eesposit@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 16.11.2022 um 13:22 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben: > These functions end up calling bdrv_create() implemented as generated_co_wrapper > functions. > In addition, they also happen to be always called in coroutine context, > meaning all callers are coroutine_fn. > This means that the g_c_w function will enter the qemu_in_coroutine() > case and eventually suspend (or in other words call qemu_coroutine_yield()). > Therefore we need to mark such functions coroutine_fn too. > > Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito Just one remark about patch ordering: This doesn't require the g_c_w_simple patches, so wouldn't it make more sense to move the g_c_w_simple right before the first patch that actually makes use of them? Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf