All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: api: Use bullet lists in kernel-doc comments
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:43:19 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3xFV2IkUlRWPdCd@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3t83uo/TZzxc1nL@lx-t490>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3368 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:27:58PM +0100, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Sorry for the trouble.
> 
> While at it, can we please keep the alignment in the original patch?
> This is supposed to be pretty too for people who look at the C code
> (most of the actual readers).
> 
> That is:
> 
>  + *
>  + *            * %PCI_IRQ_MSIX     -  Allow trying MSI-X vector allocations
>  + *            * %PCI_IRQ_MSI      -  Allow trying MSI vector allocations
>  + *            * %PCI_IRQ_LEGACY   -  Allow trying legacy INTx interrupts, if
>  + *              and only if @min_vecs == 1
>  + *            * %PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY - Auto-manage IRQs affinity by spreading
>  + *              the vectors around available CPUs
> 

For the list above, no, since if the alignment is kept, like:

---- >8 ----

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/api.c b/drivers/pci/msi/api.c
index d48c21295a88c6..13f612bbbb29b2 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi/api.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi/api.c
@@ -143,14 +143,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_msix);
  * @max_vecs: maximum desired number of vectors
  * @flags:    One or more of:
  *
- *            * %PCI_IRQ_MSIX - Allow trying MSI-X vector allocations
- *            * %PCI_IRQ_MSI - Allow trying MSI vector allocations
+ *            * %PCI_IRQ_MSIX     - Allow trying MSI-X vector allocations
+ *            * %PCI_IRQ_MSI      - Allow trying MSI vector allocations
  *
- *            * %PCI_IRQ_LEGACY - Allow trying legacy INTx interrupts, if
- *              and only if @min_vecs == 1
+ *            * %PCI_IRQ_LEGACY   - Allow trying legacy INTx interrupts, if
+ *                                  and only if @min_vecs == 1
  *
  *            * %PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY - Auto-manage IRQs affinity by spreading
- *              the vectors around available CPUs
+ *                                  the vectors around available CPUs
  *
  * Allocate up to @max_vecs interrupt vectors on device. MSI-X irq
  * vector allocation has a higher precedence over plain MSI, which has a
@@ -238,8 +238,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity);
  *       meanings, depending on interrupt mode:
  *
  *         * MSI-X - the index in the MSI-X vector table
- *         * MSI - the index of the enabled MSI vectors
- *         * INTx - must be 0
+ *         * MSI   - the index of the enabled MSI vectors
+ *         * INTx  - must be 0
  *
  * Return: the Linux IRQ number, or -EINVAL if @nr is out of range
  */
@@ -262,8 +262,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_irq_vector);
  *       meanings, depending on interrupt mode:
  *
  *         * MSI-X - the index in the MSI-X vector table
- *         * MSI - the index of the enabled MSI vectors
- *         * INTx - must be 0
+ *         * MSI   - the index of the enabled MSI vectors
+ *         * INTx  - must be 0
  *
  * Return: MSI/MSI-X vector affinity, NULL if @nr is out of range or if
  * the MSI(-X) vector was allocated without explicit affinity

, multi-line entries will be rendered as definition list instead. So, these
entries must have hanging indent of two spaces after bullet marker (*),
following alignment of first line of the entry.

Also, these entries must be separated from other entries by a line, otherwise
the list will be broken (rendered inline).

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-22  3:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21  7:41 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-21 10:12 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: api: Use bullet lists in kernel-doc comments Bagas Sanjaya
2022-11-21 12:34   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-22  3:44     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-11-21 13:27   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2022-11-22  3:43     ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2022-11-22  5:56       ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2022-11-22  8:11         ` Bagas Sanjaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3xFV2IkUlRWPdCd@debian.me \
    --to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.