From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24DAC433FE for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232641AbiKVKPB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 05:15:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232446AbiKVKOy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 05:14:54 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43D2C4091A for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:14:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1669112093; x=1700648093; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=86po1vYlzKPga3udNVhclmk5bZovkKD7bFTPvYi7fK8=; b=bRBqexpfgYDpZgjaqUKLtjCR1saG292xTMxanHxdhrCwH9tCk0d+/59o DzWmwGfwGOL0ZfZHxRcH8O+94nb4zVjkQ5+eXNbRZ1fkiQJbyazQ/pTkQ QKbWzZQOqL9nvO8PXiKQDuRqW27/nT51ypxFFmpSWOgNnVc8gC/FPsw3X O5XbANp0P0gFKdn07XHVfVGXuAc2GCbwCdIhEp/VYhdo6TEk2JKaDClpQ SvC7FfODc5VJJ30qUcYLAIx7hV0cIB25tU97b+FCojpVfy4lhH+PUzTLm HD4YCfZi8C+totDBR8WV++KdyXj/m57eKKO/oEZ4iMheb4ULtYofpUDs+ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10538"; a="311411119" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,183,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="311411119" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2022 02:14:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10538"; a="710144283" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,183,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="710144283" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2022 02:14:47 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oxQIf-00Fhtm-2Z; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:14:45 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:14:45 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Rahul Tanwar Cc: "bigeasy@linutronix.de" , "robh@kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "x86@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-lgm-soc Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/of: Fix a bug in x86 arch OF support Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:49:04AM +0000, Rahul Tanwar wrote: > On 22/11/2022 5:18 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 03:39:06PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote: > > > >> Rahul Tanwar (4): > >> x86/of: Convert Intel's APIC bindings to YAML schema > >> x86/of: Introduce new optional bool property for lapic > > > > You need properly prefix the first two patches. I guess it's something like > > "dt-bindings: x86: ioapic:". > > > > Yes, i just checked the git log of devicetree.c and used same prefixes > here. Thanks for correcting it. I will update it. Moreover the Cc list in those patches is quite wrong. I recommend to utilize my "smart" script [1] for sending series. (You may take an idea from it how to prepare the Cc list close to proper one) [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko