From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F726C4321E for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 04:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231438AbiLEEnX (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 23:43:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52076 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230501AbiLEEnS (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 23:43:18 -0500 Received: from out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA6BDEC2; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 20:43:16 -0800 (PST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R131e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045176;MF=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VWMo53a_1670215392; Received: from B-P7TQMD6M-0146.local(mailfrom:hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VWMo53a_1670215392) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:43:14 +0800 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 12:43:12 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Al Viro , Gao Xiang , Jingbo Xu , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the erofs tree Message-ID: References: <20221205092415.56cc6e19@canb.auug.org.au> <20221205151107.05579d52@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221205151107.05579d52@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:11:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Gao, > > On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:13:50 +0800 Gao Xiang wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:24:15AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in: > > > > > > fs/erofs/fscache.c > > > > > > between commits: > > > > > > 89175ef1262d ("erofs: switch to prepare_ondemand_read() in fscache mode") > > > 89175ef1262d ("erofs: switch to prepare_ondemand_read() in fscache mode") > > > > > > from the erofs tree and commit: > > > > > > 89175ef1262d ("erofs: switch to prepare_ondemand_read() in fscache mode") > > > > > > from the vfs tree. > > > > Is the commit from the vfs tree correct? > > > > The conflict fix looks good to me (we tend to enable large folios in the > > next cycle.) > > The commits should be > > 89175ef1262d ("erofs: switch to prepare_ondemand_read() in fscache mode") > a21274e993a6 ("erofs: support large folios for fscache mode") > > from the erofs tree and > > de4eda9de2d9 ("use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializers") > > from the vfs tree. > > Cut and paste weirdness caught me again :-( Thanks for the confirmation! Thanks, Gao Xiang > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell