From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1EE3C4167B for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p02hQ-0002Ob-UG; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:39:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p02hK-0002Nu-Sb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:39:03 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p02hJ-0002n6-E4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:39:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669736340; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4K4itBrEfZCKK5ZI3lKCZb9vRtlhOJbGdR+VTlRz+HM=; b=YPXXc6XLF+AWLq6mnFhQzBTonUqUpDQNex9PDo6jo5TRiS5jYlJbx4ja3VLbFmf2doqC7a +80J+iA0ktWnApb6bKoeGIxhI7J5kO9X8zuLYE0I5tYquiedZu27W8JuBFl4Oa1C3grudd NHEykwggqgnI7v5QvxVZEpTN/9XV878= Received: from mail-qk1-f197.google.com (mail-qk1-f197.google.com [209.85.222.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-593-HZD_AU2wOpi13DTDANXHZg-1; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:38:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: HZD_AU2wOpi13DTDANXHZg-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id bs7-20020a05620a470700b006fac7447b1cso29813968qkb.17 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:38:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=4K4itBrEfZCKK5ZI3lKCZb9vRtlhOJbGdR+VTlRz+HM=; b=YXPGSbhW/FOdHE87w1eezOBQItiGFlei976kORFljLtq55aJsINtYKVwS1cr/hW+RE xv9+qmueca6C3oDIpdr31BstgpMP48xkbnc/orY1BgmPHSDdMWLIHRUTGbjTDEVl+NDA jC3Q/mjtUqgPtfz5ANYFlV4PM5duUEOwY6norn1Y/Q9I132T/UifzKz8fv02k51+g0Ci u7V2LIottk/Y9HWIXRoWFG8hTsk+wvYcsqZKygbKxB5E5Bn4bR8jKspzI173lz3+Vnna k/bH459cHGZ43pGWYCNxoZZ1Pzp6/vdtcvA2OFrpbJIhyL2c7HnsCqhwYlYthNRYabqG 6hww== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmjyWWhrtwuXgB+ADNJ3VsHnQNnLydCshvEQKagvw/18UhcpO36 Fa5JSW9DXaGPYes/Qs+rjKssRgShcB+1nLhYL2yGMqqOCyocHga1q+Xv826ZXMLQOqhpFpHf97W Ft36Ls1Sudi5HEV8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5c8b:b0:3a5:b02:a3b7 with SMTP id ge11-20020a05622a5c8b00b003a50b02a3b7mr37046572qtb.277.1669736332422; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:38:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6Brtvfykasrhi39odgutjjiwTFTZuat07zKkg75Rcp0C/sswvJGjaQ1qJutBWhr8PBr1BaNA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5c8b:b0:3a5:b02:a3b7 with SMTP id ge11-20020a05622a5c8b00b003a50b02a3b7mr37046554qtb.277.1669736332165; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from x1n (bras-base-aurron9127w-grc-46-70-31-27-79.dsl.bell.ca. [70.31.27.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h9-20020a05620a244900b006fa617ac616sm10820669qkn.49.2022.11.29.07.38.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:38:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:38:50 -0500 From: Peter Xu To: Jason Wang Cc: mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, viktor@daynix.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] intel-iommu: fail DEVIOTLB_UNMAP without dt mode Message-ID: References: <20221129081037.12099-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20221129081037.12099-3-jasowang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221129081037.12099-3-jasowang@redhat.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 04:10:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Without dt mode, device IOTLB notifier won't work since guest won't > send device IOTLB invalidation descriptor in this case. Let's fail > early instead of misbehaving silently. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang > --- > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > index 9143376677..d025ef2873 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > @@ -3179,6 +3179,7 @@ static int vtd_iommu_notify_flag_changed(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu, > { > VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as = container_of(iommu, VTDAddressSpace, iommu); > IntelIOMMUState *s = vtd_as->iommu_state; > + X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s); > > /* TODO: add support for VFIO and vhost users */ > if (s->snoop_control) { > @@ -3193,6 +3194,13 @@ static int vtd_iommu_notify_flag_changed(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu, > PCI_FUNC(vtd_as->devfn)); > return -ENOTSUP; > } > + if (!x86_iommu->dt_supported && (new & IOMMU_NOTIFIER_DEVIOTLB_UNMAP)) { > + error_setg_errno(errp, ENOTSUP, > + "device %02x.%02x.%x requires device IOTLB mode", > + pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus), PCI_SLOT(vtd_as->devfn), > + PCI_FUNC(vtd_as->devfn)); > + return -ENOTSUP; > + } Hmm I thought we have had this already, so we don't?... :-( Reviewed-by: Peter Xu -- Peter Xu