From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B05233F9
	for <llvm@lists.linux.dev>; Sun,  4 Dec 2022 15:38:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF1DFC433D6;
	Sun,  4 Dec 2022 15:38:43 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org;
	s=korg; t=1670168324;
	bh=ctdI2YEvFlmKT2YJRj65yRkzoZol77bTrzDHpgJn8NQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=JDb1cZcG9Zp4n+iEM1Z0Nbb+L55UUdjR4k4HrlYY6FozQYZMidWFe4lcDW/3BamXr
	 bYlQXgZtK7bL1gqHn4+WexrPerWgxYFceEw5XV4FAEqAZVEYpv4OgxsxgV52elVSRr
	 8/Mh9LcZCX+I+/8nLfzE8/gq8gjYexuVDUvdCDbA=
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 16:38:40 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 and earlier only] mm: Fix '.data.once' orphan section
 warning
Message-ID: <Y4y/AEsLmKRcQ/R0@kroah.com>
References: <20221128225345.9383-1-nathan@kernel.org>
 <Y4tQYgjDgodwR2pP@kroah.com>
 <5f9317c7-e899-a6b2-dd23-664a1b6d629@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <llvm.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:llvm+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:llvm+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5f9317c7-e899-a6b2-dd23-664a1b6d629@google.com>

On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 09:41:34AM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 03:53:46PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell, this should be applied to 5.4 and earlier. It
> > > should apply cleanly but let me know if not.
> > 
> > Queued up everywhere, thanks.
> 
> Thanks for queueing them up, Greg, but please read through the thread:
> I have doubts on the 4.14 and 4.9 ones, which would want a different patch
> if we're going to make any change; but thought we could just leave those
> trees without the patch, and Nathan agreed.

Oops, sorry, now dropped from 4.14 and 4.9 and I left the 4.19 one as
that one was ok to keep, right?

thanks,

greg k-h