All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
Cc: "Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	"Moritz Fischer" <mdf@kernel.org>, "Wu Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	"Xu Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>, "Tom Rix" <trix@redhat.com>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	system@metrotek.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:50:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6xXmcCa4L9iz5qm@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221227100450.2257-3-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2821 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:04:49PM +0300, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> Original busy loop with retries count in mpf_poll_status() is not too
> reliable, as it takes different times on different systems. Replace it
> with read_poll_timeout() macro.
> 
> While at it, fix polling stop condition to met function's original
> intention declared in the comment. The issue with original polling stop
> condition is that it stops if any of mask bits is set, while intention
> was to stop if all mask bits is set. This was not noticible because only
> MPF_STATUS_READY is passed as mask argument and it is BIT(1).
> 
> Fixes: 5f8d4a900830 ("fpga: microchip-spi: add Microchip MPF FPGA manager")
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> index e72fedd93a27..8d1d9476d0cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> @@ -33,7 +34,7 @@
>  
>  #define	MPF_BITS_PER_COMPONENT_SIZE	22
>  
> -#define	MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES		10000
> +#define	MPF_STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT		(2 * USEC_PER_SEC)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_BUSY			BIT(0)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_READY		BIT(1)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_SPI_VIOLATION	BIT(2)
> @@ -197,21 +198,16 @@ static int mpf_ops_parse_header(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>  /* Poll HW status until busy bit is cleared and mask bits are set. */
>  static int mpf_poll_status(struct mpf_priv *priv, u8 mask)
>  {
> -	int status, retries = MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES;
> +	int ret, status;
>  
> -	while (retries--) {
> -		status = mpf_read_status(priv);
> -		if (status < 0)
> -			return status;
> -
> -		if (status & MPF_STATUS_BUSY)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (!mask || (status & mask))
> -			return status;
> -	}

Would you mind moving the small comment before the function down to here
and mentioning handling the failure case?
The current implementation is a bit easier to understand than the new
version that's wrapped in read_poll_timeout().

Otherwise, change seems like a good idea.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

> +	ret = read_poll_timeout(mpf_read_status, status,
> +				(status < 0) ||
> +				((status & (MPF_STATUS_BUSY | mask)) == mask),
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
>  
> -	return -EBUSY;
> +	return status;
>  }
>  
>  static int mpf_spi_write(struct mpf_priv *priv, const void *buf, size_t buf_size)
> -- 
> 2.38.2
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-28 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-27 10:04 [PATCH v3 0/3] Reliability improvements for Microchip MPF FPGA manager Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fpga: microchip-spi: move SPI I/O buffers out of stack Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-28 14:42   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-27 10:22   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-12-28 14:50   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fpga: microchip-spi: separate data frame write routine Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-28 14:54   ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y6xXmcCa4L9iz5qm@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=system@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.