Hi Benjamin,

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 03:32:37PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> 
> 

[...]

> 
> I am back home, and I just tested that. I had a doubt, and it is indeed
> failing. You need the following change for this to be working (I need to
> send it as a proper patch after assessing it hasn't side effects)

Did it come up with any side effects? :-)

> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> index 13cce286247e..f37ffe2bd488 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ static void hid_irq_in(struct urb *urb)
>         int                     status;
>         switch (urb->status) {
> +       case -EOVERFLOW:        /* happens with modified report descriptors */
>         case 0:                 /* success */
>                 usbhid->retry_delay = 0;
>                 if (!test_bit(HID_OPENED, &usbhid->iofl))
> ---
> 
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
> 

Best regards,
Marcus Folkesson