All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iommufd v2 8/9] irq/s390: Add arch_is_isolated_msi() for s390
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 20:13:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7YWIFxyl8gD7J47@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB527666D2192E2C25FF8A36AA8CE19@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:39:25AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 2:46 AM
> > @@ -660,7 +664,7 @@ static inline bool msi_device_has_isolated_msi(struct
> > device *dev)
> >  	 * is inherently isolated by our definition. As nobody seems to needs
> >  	 * this be conservative and return false anyhow.
> 
> Also update the comment given the returned value is arch specific
> now.

	/*
	 * Arguably if the platform does not enable MSI support then it has
	 * "isolated MSI", as an interrupt controller that cannot receive MSIs
	 * is inherently isolated by our definition. The default definition for
	 * arch_is_isolated_msi() is conservative and returns false anyhow.
	 */

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-05  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-12 18:45 [PATCH iommufd v2 0/9] Remove IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:45 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 1/9] irq: Add msi_device_has_isolated_msi() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:45 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 2/9] iommu: Add iommu_group_has_isolated_msi() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-13 14:37   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:45 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 3/9] vfio/type1: Convert to iommu_group_has_isolated_msi() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:45 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 4/9] iommufd: Convert to msi_device_has_isolated_msi() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:45 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 5/9] irq: Remove unused irq_domain_check_msi_remap() code Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:46 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 6/9] irq: Rename IRQ_DOMAIN_MSI_REMAP to IRQ_DOMAIN_ISOLATED_MSI Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:46 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 7/9] iommu/x86: Replace IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP with IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_ISOLATED_MSI Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 18:46 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 8/9] irq/s390: Add arch_is_isolated_msi() for s390 Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-15  7:39   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-01-05  0:13     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-12-19 16:16   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-12-12 18:46 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 9/9] iommu: Remove IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-15  7:39 ` [PATCH iommufd v2 0/9] " Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7YWIFxyl8gD7J47@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bharat.bhushan@nxp.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.