From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3F9C05027 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232667AbjBCMBV (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2023 07:01:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232618AbjBCMBR (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2023 07:01:17 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0054953DD for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 04:01:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=11y57wpqO0jUchP58rm0Hy4isyaoxOgtIaNkgxr4gwM=; b=krHJemkCKnjw1vySw4wbRPzonA GcdbjfrMqf79LiiUZamIQYCi3trl34buHcBOCL70BfqcZcU1I0NiN1ZoLyraEGjz2ayCN1gi28sOk 0TfLdgORVpQDLYWXrVxp5FvGcLqZ9JLdPZrWaIXtp2shlKxzQdGhbyXIFlemETxUhIczihJm/XwmV ugj5nUIg3p6ISceD4I4CQDYtg//bPylN9Z1nQce5jwSs3XHEwdj356/RrqIwLwblxYBOuQgCbGfsg Wm0STDA54e+zNvxlyEMQbx2At28xTYPKco1dZwNaAAb6mCvQXWvnj05kWGdJeLi2rnHsP9XNh4eiq stI7usYg==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pNukR-00EHpx-Io; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 12:00:56 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B9C30013F; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:00:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4387D212BDE6A; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:00:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:00:54 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Hillf Danton , Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, syzbot Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING: locking bug in umh_complete Message-ID: References: <20230127014137.4906-1-hdanton@sina.com> <9d9b9652-c1ac-58e9-2eab-9256c17b1da2@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9d9b9652-c1ac-58e9-2eab-9256c17b1da2@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:22:43PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2023/01/27 10:41, Hillf Danton wrote: > >> Call Trace: > >> > >> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline] > >> lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633 > >> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] > >> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 > >> complete+0x1d/0x1f0 kernel/sched/completion.c:32 > >> umh_complete+0x32/0x90 kernel/umh.c:59 > >> call_usermodehelper_exec_sync kernel/umh.c:144 [inline] > >> call_usermodehelper_exec_work+0x115/0x180 kernel/umh.c:167 > >> process_one_work+0x9bf/0x1710 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 > >> worker_thread+0x669/0x1090 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 > >> kthread+0x2e8/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376 > >> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 > >> > > > > This is an interesting case - given done initialized on stack, no garbage > > should have been detected by lockdep. > > > > One explanation to the report is uaf on the waker side, and it can be > > tested with the diff below when a reproducer is available. > > > > Hillf > > > > --- a/kernel/umh.c > > +++ b/kernel/umh.c > > @@ -452,6 +452,12 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subp > > /* umh_complete() will see NULL and free sub_info */ > > if (xchg(&sub_info->complete, NULL)) > > goto unlock; > > + else { > > + /* wait for umh_complete() to finish in a bid to avoid > > + * uaf because done is destructed > > + */ Invalid comment style at the very least. > > + wait_for_completion(&done); > > + } > > } > > > > wait_done: > > -- > > Yes, this bug is caused by commit f5d39b020809 ("freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer > logic"), for that commit for unknown reason omits wait_for_completion(&done) call > when wait_for_completion_state(&done, state) returned -ERESTARTSYS. > > Peter, is it safe to restore wait_for_completion(&done) call? Urgh, that code is terrible.. the way I read it was that it would wait_for_completion_killable() if KILLABLE and assumed the second wait_for_completion() would NOP out because we'd already completed on the first. I don't see how adding a second wait is correct in the case of -ERESTARTSYS, what's the stop this second wait to also get interrupted like that? Should there be a loop?