Re: Linux 5.11-rc5

From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:41:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YA5E44s1zl4aCD6x@Gentoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b975e215-0dd1-65fe-be51-c7c8c7b6571a@roeck-us.net>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed, Size: 2200 bytes --]

On 20:06 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>On 1/24/21 7:56 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> On 19:48 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>> So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today.
>>>>
>>>> In fact, over 40% of the non-merge commits came in today, as people
>>>> unloaded their work for the week on me. The end result is a slightly
>>>> larger than usual rc5 (but both 5.10 and 5.8 were bigger, so not some
>>>> kind of odd outlier).
>>>>
>>>> Nothing particularly stands out. We had a couple of splice()
>>>> regressions that came in during the previous release as part of the
>>>> "get rid of set_fs()" development, but they were for odd cases that
>>>> most people would never notice. I think it's just that 5.10 is now
>>>> getting more widely deployed so people see the fallout from that
>>>> rather fundamental change in the last release.  And the only reason I
>>>> even reacted to those is just because I ended up being involved with
>>>> some of the tty patches during the early calm period of the past week.
>>>> There's a few more still pending.
>>>>
>>>> But the bulk of it all is all the usual miscellaneous fixes all over
>>>> the place, and a lot of it is truly trivial one- or few-liners. Just
>>>> under half the patch is for drivers, with the rest being the usual mix
>>>> of tooling, arch updates, filesystem and core (mm, scheduling,
>>>> networking).
>>>>
>>>> Nothing here makes me go "Uhhuh" in other words.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looking pretty good now.
>>>
>>> Build results:
>>>     total: 153 pass: 153 fail: 0
>>> Qemu test results:
>>>     total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0
>>>
>>> Guenter
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Mind letting us know ,what you are running? Any automated stuff? Any specific
>> tool or tools?? Scripts???
>>
>> Bloody curious to know Guenter ...if those stuff are expose able to public
>> consumption , please do provide the pointer too (I am being lazy to find it)
>>
>
>Results:
>	https://kerneltests.org/builders
>Script repository:
>	https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test
>
>Guenter
>

Thanks a bunch!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]