From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5632AC43331 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F51222A84 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729806AbhAYPnp (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:43:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730289AbhAYPnR (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:43:17 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92AC0C061224 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id 63so13139842oty.0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:40:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HMhlvN/0qUkxkBvn42Qzst+rDXv1nNg5raUrF0ceYAg=; b=gniULOJp9n/TmdR7IKubbTansYJHXAkcvl0wE24MWhslCE4CPOqqRk24xAkIPYOzEB dhgcZKbe5kBZLAgFIYxEev4AGNLcGBf55ZCAovc4r0OV1n93NPKaQJJ3q4LGotg1YQQL iD2L7IidOriAdCFJ0blAPkwRxOPniy8wC4Q6Xf06V6pigOkKQk/oZEbptwMoHH+UZDBi KxnQI6IJFviEUChlh7hgfigXXf7cqczov1wkjuWge/cYmpAqv/tFyidObNpifrc5at15 quucr4NG+yfB0eYwAi9oA0ZBFXff7IVuzaoPwaYm5g1QB+QbOKl1MI9SKb8NV9peT7wt B/BA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HMhlvN/0qUkxkBvn42Qzst+rDXv1nNg5raUrF0ceYAg=; b=jDNXmYeRmnamFrxR5gDO86jGOZicv7JXu8r97OcaTZQHQaWe5GWBFSyIRJ+2Gn6Kjc OtbxQadML0kdeX13hK3j67mOx0xF1yL70XV+aInW/hWw4FyZP1P7+TVRkmJZMOfE+A3n 1I8Lt2cAVGuG8+p6UxgtgN6kDTjwlqxtEHSKgPrKT9jgCvgon44omqHdakXqLhy8Mn6o DeyAJ4v2+0GolXZAmkZAI985gU7B+AWFcJqMGNq3+a8U6FtDWhvd+m8uKMT/LKr/FTph Jc4DdcOT4sf1qOzCTZZNaCfG60rhzn+U+Jew3fbgC2FJyizsR5pjwOf1jKxC1WN4feaY iHZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327f38Umgx03mB/3lW5ZT95+lAt/prEDb6NiFGbVVXvjTLFT5WU RGVckU3x9A/etfeIXoqg7QR9KA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhv4969ipyc9wnZkQqK9xyIYx8poGZOlPgc9l0x3BhcmMOT2vPALgymgrWZGST/QrzZBgiHw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d0:: with SMTP id r16mr853016ota.54.1611589228341; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:40:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from builder.lan (104-57-184-186.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [104.57.184.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m185sm3563782oib.48.2021.01.25.07.40.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:40:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:40:25 -0600 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Konrad Dybcio Cc: Luca Weiss , Iskren Chernev , ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, Andy Gross , Rob Herring , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Pascua , Alexey Minnekhanov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-klte: add support for display Message-ID: References: <20210124135610.1779295-1-iskren.chernev@gmail.com> <20210124135610.1779295-3-iskren.chernev@gmail.com> <282b07a1-2e39-2dbe-dd7b-eed2ae9e25fb@somainline.org> <6632821.dtBD41K2ms@g550jk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Sun 24 Jan 11:33 CST 2021, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > All msm8974 dts(i) files use this style. Deviating from it for this doesn't > > make sense. And yes msm8974 should probably be converted to the newer label > > style (as was done with msm8916 a while ago). > > I have a >3k lines commit fixing that. Adding more code that strays > from the new style doesn't really help. > I know how bad it is, so I understand your desire to not have to rebase that, but I will merge things as they become ready on the list. So please post your change (perhaps it's posted and I'm failing to find it in my inbox?) and I'd be happy to merge it so we get it cleaned up! Thanks, Bjorn