From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9C2C433DB for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71981221FB for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731258AbhATMV7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 07:21:59 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36486 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731545AbhATLzN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 06:55:13 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1543206EC; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:54:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1611143672; bh=m0hGLxyRjyQuwevEDwatHLzadWCoG9IxWdwPWe0MxlE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UBbU52N5xBXC6QajKw7ThYZIIR0ent0bgz1t/zrP7zu/Tx8IfY3S1fUYzvfzLWYgt kkg88r4McCbvVitYC4UlNOm2XryiYqViq06+2TL9nxlGTk5wQsPvKXmpYfzdq+x+wk v7PpBlzYhKZfxn9I3wadbV0ICVARyKsXhOlsuklgqhXbzG8fMoity2b7TY9c4qcSu3 Gx4355+7IJ/EIF5B48tZlgwriBUM9TmujDNKhlBH56G/Bzx9LbPNH0b+0H0qqovc01 hJWSKjN9HEu4TAopknbMCZqyI0IznYofPe0EiKgcQG2RlGw76fgbI082Vy/BQ1wTAt a4dFrjBoT9OnA== Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:54:26 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Kai Huang Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/26] x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests Message-ID: References: <4597db567351468c360fc810fff5a8232cb96c4c.1610935432.git.kai.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4597db567351468c360fc810fff5a8232cb96c4c.1610935432.git.kai.huang@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote: > From: Sean Christopherson > > Add a misc device /dev/sgx_virt_epc to allow userspace to allocate "raw" > EPC without an associated enclave. The intended and only known use case > for raw EPC allocation is to expose EPC to a KVM guest, hence the > virt_epc moniker, virt.{c,h} files and X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION Kconfig. Is /dev/sgx_virt_epc something only usable for KVM, or is there any thinkable use outside of the KVM context? /Jarkko