From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3E2C433E0 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737ED20758 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235403AbhA0JmG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 04:42:06 -0500 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:60825 "EHLO wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229722AbhA0JkE (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 04:40:04 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD6B499; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 04:38:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 04:38:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=eG+zq7v+gLI7XOa4rrspPeY9nhn cigoujY489dDssjQ=; b=QqCDrTDI9XLmxXe9sWa05HVO3QbjZDo1UnbL/VBh8XQ lt5PyxGvj6YzmsqdomkNV/REdtrrp3xdug2d5LD9ZlYqA74OgagZo2MY3HbvdyJQ Bgn2SkI6LCe2oXnMmm9Z9pVzFsEMwH2m9UJcu96XX/Y9V4bjO4A+nSKROPUUolLU 7WMoomoch1WhlBJYi8g2qWw4pBYe+p+R5WFmjzpvQTPz+7lGSTNsYsHobXbD4WRV awtWfWacOiRDQ3OtulCko9WB7UGNz00lWWj0Uz2tlmVSdivzJ0e4dWDWyaz155Ra FxS2AQ219xzvAetiPQ1s/5VPcULhgkYhl++DYsk5Clg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=eG+zq7 v+gLI7XOa4rrspPeY9nhncigoujY489dDssjQ=; b=jddtmPNEqtfN1H4QP5JZHl F1q2gU3BiBd5iMmT60WTxjGH8+fEJHHRInGmdzAIS4En2wIut2CQGogaxF7McfSr /59bivHaZWTcUOUK8ozr4EWwkpaRWyGh+Ai9/LL4bcvE/IFrKhdO/PqnyeVStQfY x8+2/ffCnw0ajpoCb+4k9AHMSJ3AjIxZhksXnqdwA3RqPVb/yRljrY6iwiLxrU1e aH/1FOzWw39z6Lrn2RjDrPl7e5AK/rCK2gO+5/YrtRZoEZ+zId/G3UNJCFKVooSt fsD+8HeJ8QA2kKBA1p2muwRLdCbAcGsxSnsX8K6JHizpLroULvod0Z5+tTizFzmg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdekgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfm jfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveeuheejgf ffgfeivddukedvkedtleelleeghfeljeeiueeggeevueduudekvdetnecukfhppeekfedr keeirdejgedrieegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 29B4824005E; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 04:38:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:38:53 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Rapoport , stable , Chris Wilson , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5 Message-ID: References: <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> <20210125213348.GB196782@linux.ibm.com> <161161117911.29150.13853544418926100149@build.alporthouse.com> <20210126162440.GC196782@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:45:10AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:25 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:46:19PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > > > CI does confirm that the revert of d3921cb8be29 brings the machines back > > > to life. > > > > I still cannot see what could possibly go wrong, so let's revert > > d3921cb8be29 for now and I'll continue to work with Chris to debug this. > > Ok, reverted in my tree. > > And added stable to the cc, so that they know not to pick up that > commit d3921cb8be29, despite it being marked for stable. I've dropped it from the 5.10.y queue now, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h