From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E06EC433DB for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D833E64E97 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231695AbhBANtk (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:49:40 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:41724 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231587AbhBANti (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:49:38 -0500 IronPort-SDR: xtKhVSOoZ4n1paLzTf+jQ9yqjwdqRWLoYm1i5dOLuc+fP3dvggmdezUxszWepYcBynvO1L5wGH xBJqaZBGN/mQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9881"; a="178121833" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,392,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="178121833" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2021 05:47:52 -0800 IronPort-SDR: e0Pb8xLftFnVZ66obmmc+PebsCnX4ifT8jEX/Rs7q1llwWJkBwsu4wt0fhPE0Je7Tue9zHjHUl 4aUybhdfs58g== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,392,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="371555767" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2021 05:47:47 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ZYN-0018z2-F0; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:47:43 +0200 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:47:43 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Yury Norov Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , Arnd Bergmann , Dennis Zhou , Andrew Morton , Wolfram Sang , David Sterba , Stefano Brivio , "Ma, Jianpeng" , Wei Yang , Josh Poimboeuf , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] lib: inline _find_next_bit() wrappers Message-ID: References: <20210130191719.7085-1-yury.norov@gmail.com> <20210130191719.7085-7-yury.norov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210130191719.7085-7-yury.norov@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:17:17AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote: > lib/find_bit.c declares five single-line wrappers for _find_next_bit(). > We may turn those wrappers to inline functions. It eliminates unneeded > function calls and opens room for compile-time optimizations. > tools/include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h | 27 +++++++++--- > tools/lib/find_bit.c | 52 ++++++++++------------- In a separated patch, please. I don't think we need to defer this series in case if tools lagged (which is usual case in my practice). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko