From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3137C433E9 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821A464F93 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232173AbhBCRzs (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:55:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231145AbhBCRzg (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:55:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA46FC0613ED for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id e12so290931pls.4 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:54:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=WLPpmuoMnntjkG/fIUbWX3oVqD2wo7PLGg0ygE+p8qQ=; b=wMWCpb1OCsMUwMThFJU2HENyKWAnxoazDitFa1VcrahK/ipAxejl9JMO3av09MtLzP Du6gF7odkfIozdqXvE4KO6hon5kV5AT4a+rmwNjt32+PBs0wr35wu9gmteRBpECTdl1g EpmYVzpQyaoANoSPiKlbgC1AT9Ykhk2vB1YolUExrStWrZDQ9sAICBqkIGzRD313AXk9 Vk/QyZT8YTazoTns28KhCYs3xbtmTcEo48Zb5ZIO5uqkP5dXaHl25McfJn4iRUbfpYnO zmq4yUW39LSxrZMh97pnIsgiLt2u13zSEEld3U8kjswdDqdL6FJlv8l1BIPV60ty9POO 0zTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=WLPpmuoMnntjkG/fIUbWX3oVqD2wo7PLGg0ygE+p8qQ=; b=WUGwEpCTPqdlIzchU201SvGDSBKlxXZxAtLIRAp5AbOEflTwvYoXYk0bnTFsmE+DWX 7TPWsBzRGhJgpRGtq07KIhJSyBBQsSkQF2qmGcAYQcNll0c0CC4+UEDzAGTRU/nhqus6 g/z0OMS1zT7EylwJXyKwHGxGremMqKiEvxfyjp+u/hye3yzl+euosN5+l9QY8CQx9JiV bRGewBtgrlFqTzDTRpyMkiYFXAw9gdaoJz7LRZIZmzLZHuesEbZB678ueKZOtpFNDSaZ XO8gQhjSxTm6oXYexLAlXJ9CnrxPYwYWmXBKgPhRImeFFGoIilxoBi5ExY/2/IGGqYQY CrBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OxPchrLQbeK7wecEt7fvnfb7+trXpxOjy9Dx8RDq5v3/BwYCt 4MdlMaTMpTfbUhj6SZELXPZ7mQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuao3RhAbtQt222HYu0p+Q/piZgOBtiyBCfae1XCn2dcKGdo6Go7mDGWqi/WrR4GK2+OpEtA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a581:b029:e1:8d90:2810 with SMTP id az1-20020a170902a581b02900e18d902810mr4063101plb.85.1612374894962; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:54:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:f:10:a9a0:e924:d161:b6cb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm3237279pgt.26.2021.02.03.09.54.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:54:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:54:47 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Ben Gardon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Xu , Peter Shier , Peter Feiner , Junaid Shahid , Jim Mattson , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Allow parallel MMU operations with TDP MMU Message-ID: References: <20210202185734.1680553-1-bgardon@google.com> <298548e9-ead2-5770-7ae8-e501c9c17263@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <298548e9-ead2-5770-7ae8-e501c9c17263@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 03, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Looks good! I'll wait for a few days of reviews, I guess I know what I'm doing this afternoon :-) > but I'd like to queue this for 5.12 and I plan to make it the default in 5.13 > or 5.12-rc (depending on when I can ask Red Hat QE to give it a shake). Hmm, given that kvm/queue doesn't seem to get widespread testing, I think it should be enabled by default in rc1 for whatever kernel it targets. Would it be too heinous to enable it by default in 5.12-rc1, knowing full well that there's a good possibility it would get reverted?