From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A081C433E6 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204E164EB8 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232401AbhBIPOC (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:14:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51006 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232014AbhBIPN6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:13:58 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B101C061788 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 07:13:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=dUYN0boWBMMs1TlxAWQArWnMpuyrkLnX1B19yQ7qg60=; b=lLgHTy5av/y2qcVDW7+wONJvFt cjUxSI9ADN1FwpSpBt1Z3K+6aj4N0AYriEtuqVgyQCNaEB5OHSA154Jwv2g10uU2/0x46X/mEtJIf FAqiV0kbCJIKIc7boMR0wiUpnYmfZvqAL9CRl8CGjNgFmPSUFw0Z6hxfyd+ckwdlFNjcsMg0RAfbh bMfeEmWiJyUEbIbK72poTcYTJHBvwQ9n/aMXawHnJKZ4OLYxMBP5wvHKhhslKNGePvMN0wSlPuLEf 2X0XSP5nTQlvxt0wwz1DoYywUmUzL8/nSHc2QW9Q1mZNfjg3CarcIH2/Fpiyxw7sGwW0fJ3tE4tdB ep1Hegyw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l9UhV-000524-Sh; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:13:14 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D5AF304BAE; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:13:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69EB22BC93529; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:13:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:13:10 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mike Galbraith Cc: lkml , Michal Hocko , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch] preempt: select PREEMPT_DYNAMIC under PREEMPTION instead of PREEMPT Message-ID: References: <7d129a84b0858fd7fbc3e38ede62a848fbec536e.camel@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d129a84b0858fd7fbc3e38ede62a848fbec536e.camel@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > PREEMPT_RT and PREEMPT both needs PREEMPT_DYNAMIC to build, so move > selection of PREEMPT_DYNAMIC to the common denominator, PREEMPTION. I'm confused, why would you want PREEMPT_DYNAMIC for PREEMPT_RT ? PREEMPT_RT without full preemption is just plain daft, no?