From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDEDC433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FF764D9C for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1836875AbhCBHVX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 02:21:23 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48316 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1836209AbhCBGtl (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 01:49:41 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA11261601; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 06:48:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1614667735; bh=6gx9TQVInjaRAjc4CSLRzI0NtYgyuPCdiIBICyndZqI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yn8PYz7nhQn2VRsk6fUnEaWqn5TEbEGqIqytnOOrRBIAxiWc/D2NmAEMZpA9aAIFR fZhXExBNjAC3oxJwOFcTMEo7bNfpzBVhBtMjgxlOQqsqLMQ4/t8gs4q3jRVo77ynw0 s4FL2ptZrkzUOMwFCvmVmAtU94vrbfrMWRaLm2So= Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:48:52 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Hanjun Guo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, zou_wei@huawei.com, Yanjin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/340] 5.4.102-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20210301161048.294656001@linuxfoundation.org> <8271eb39-c44d-37ed-7501-e9d05d7fee17@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8271eb39-c44d-37ed-7501-e9d05d7fee17@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:42:15PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 2021/3/2 0:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.102 release. > > There are 340 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:09:49 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > Our test CI monitored the 5.4.102-rc2, and compile failure: > > kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘IRQ_WORK_INIT’; did you mean ‘IRQ_WORK_BUSY’? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > IRQ_WORK_BUSY > kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: invalid initializer > > Should be commit e1e41aa31ed1 (rcu/nocb: Trigger self-IPI on late > deferred wake up before user resume) fails the build. Odd, what arch/configuration causes this? > By the way, do you expect us test the 5.4.102-rc1 or the > 5.4.102-rc2 in your tree? -rc2 would be great, given that it fixes a number of reported issues with -rc1. thanks, greg k-h