From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09467C433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC0765230 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:41:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9EC0765230 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56666 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJIxA-0000ow-Ip for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:41:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJIuK-0006N3-O9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:39:00 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:37363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJIuJ-00019Y-Ae for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:39:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1615221538; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o0fcOMpU2KEXvzQYeFxhBqN1BsrejK4zyKGa2wXkExk=; b=ZVoAp3Cnsy/BIDARc+LEtYGY+XEUA1iXGRYraF4u8FCzArhTi1oKhvwTVqsxoWqmx2gIbr 76YCCwNqSqrp04MNBYac7t4oPcVu+sFCX6zna2FgJPzG6cHt0F6ZFUiouoqicqsqvMcKQk QPYEYqzVq/CPctWVx3gEs+Bls3+oTXU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-563-S7e5xCbfMcKnYuGBliYUPQ-1; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:38:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: S7e5xCbfMcKnYuGBliYUPQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1CCB1084D69; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-114-104.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.104]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4735C5C5FC; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:38:46 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Klaus Jensen Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] hw/block/nvme: convert ad-hoc aio tracking to aiocbs Message-ID: References: <20210302111040.289244-1-its@irrelevant.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210302111040.289244-1-its@irrelevant.dk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=stefanha@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2SXR6puLrj0iWDVr" Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=stefanha@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.251, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Klaus Jensen , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Keith Busch Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" --2SXR6puLrj0iWDVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:10:36PM +0100, Klaus Jensen wrote: > Marking RFC, since I've not really done anything with QEMU AIOs and BHs > on this level before, so I'd really like some block-layer eyes on it. I took a brief look and it seems like a nice conversion of the code. Stefan --2SXR6puLrj0iWDVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAmBGUxYACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8hW+wf/c3P1r2HX/WjfcErJnipobB615DsIY9bp3p5LWcSib3nwAf9VUBdQ+3yD p0ZSdZDP9ASWVYtbjniAQ7oLHwSrNLT8Uv2ERNnl8uToGvSJ/X+wRZZ6z8tL1cJI 1Ysy9ZcEH8kptCKQ6INdtGuvxnmW/jwTp124ysdIjsuvR+5T+1P4el1/bnY6YNeH oqRtH9HSKy2m0q2G4MY72I3Xisd8l0ZCsA1aXZNpHTDVsAD61kC/roBZDWhob7lH lOeXhHklNfubfWJEocxG/QW2BiENehs6V69WeqvzFKULV/IMoOrLLKlUcA1/b6O1 C5q7lcQAOtChSovQrGcINvMWHTkWyQ== =sqFA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2SXR6puLrj0iWDVr--