All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, nathan@kernel.org,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:43:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEkhYtQD68Qy/gcA@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304175030.184131-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:50:30PM -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> Fix a build issue when x509_revocation_list is not defined.
> 
> $ make ARCH=x86_64 O=build64 all
> 
>  EXTRACT_CERTS   ../
> At main.c:154:
> - SSL error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no start line: crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:745
> extract-cert: ../: Is a directory
> make[2]: [../certs/Makefile:119: certs/x509_revocation_list] Error 1 (ignored)
> 
> When the new CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST was added [1], it was not carried
> into the code for preloading the revocation certificates [2].  Change from
> using the original CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING  to the new
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m562c1b27bf402190e7bb573ad20eff5b6310d08f
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m07e258bf019ccbac23820fad5192ceffa74fc6ab
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>

Got my first ever chance to try out b4:

$ b4 am 20210304175030.184131-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com
Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304175030.184131-1-eric.snowberg%40oracle.com
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/keyrings
Analyzing 5 messages in the thread
---
Writing ./v2_20210304_eric_snowberg_certs_fix_wrong_kconfig_option_used_for_x509_revocation_list.mbx
  ✓ [PATCH v2] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
    + Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org)
  ---
  ✓ Attestation-by: DKIM/oracle.com (From: eric.snowberg@oracle.com)
---
Total patches: 1
---
 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304175030.184131-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com
 Base: not found
       git am ./v2_20210304_eric_snowberg_certs_fix_wrong_kconfig_option_used_for_x509_revocation_list.mbx

Wondering tho, what "Base: not found" means?

> ---
> v2 changes:
>   Use the new config option for extract-cert
>   Use the new config option when building revocation_certificates.o
> ---
>  certs/Makefile    | 5 +++--
>  certs/blacklist.c | 4 ++++
>  scripts/Makefile  | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/Makefile b/certs/Makefile
> index e3f4926fd21e..b6db52ebf0be 100644
> --- a/certs/Makefile
> +++ b/certs/Makefile
> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
>  #
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) += system_keyring.o system_certificates.o common.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o revocation_certificates.o common.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o common.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST) += revocation_certificates.o
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST),"")
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist_hashes.o
>  else
> @@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ $(obj)/signing_key.x509: scripts/extract-cert $(X509_DEP) FORCE
>  	$(call if_changed,extract_certs,$(MODULE_SIG_KEY_SRCPREFIX)$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY))
>  endif # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
>  
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING),y)
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
>  
>  $(eval $(call config_filename,SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS))
>  
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index 723b19c96256..c9a435b15af4 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@
>  
>  static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>  extern __initconst const u8 revocation_certificate_list[];
>  extern __initconst const unsigned long revocation_certificate_list_size;
> +#endif
>  
>  /*
>   * The description must be a type prefix, a colon and then an even number of
> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
>   */
>  device_initcall(blacklist_init);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>  /*
>   * Load the compiled-in list of revocation X.509 certificates.
>   */
> @@ -237,3 +240,4 @@ static __init int load_revocation_certificate_list(void)
>  				     blacklist_keyring);
>  }
>  late_initcall(load_revocation_certificate_list);
> +#endif
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile b/scripts/Makefile
> index 983b785f13cb..bd0718f7c493 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_ASN1)				+= asn1_compiler
>  hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT)		+= sign-file
>  hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING)	+= extract-cert
>  hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_EXTRA_CERTIFICATE)	+= insert-sys-cert
> - hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING)	+= extract-cert
> +hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST)	+= extract-cert
>  
>  HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o = -I$(srctree)/tools/include
>  HOSTCFLAGS_asn1_compiler.o = -I$(srctree)/include
> -- 
> 2.18.4
> 
> 
The patch does not apply:

$ git am -3 v2_20210304_eric_snowberg_certs_fix_wrong_kconfig_option_used_for_x509_revocation_list.mbx
Applying: certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (certs/Makefile).
error: could not build fake ancestor
Patch failed at 0001 certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

/Jarkko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04 17:50 [PATCH v2] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list Eric Snowberg
2021-03-04 18:10 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-03-05 21:50 ` David Howells
2021-03-09  2:28   ` Eric Snowberg
2021-03-09 11:46   ` David Howells
2021-03-10 19:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-03-10 19:44   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-11  0:04   ` Eric Snowberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YEkhYtQD68Qy/gcA@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.