All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, aleksander@aleksander.es,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
	hemantk@codeaurora.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: Add a WWAN subsystem
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:48:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEpJwsSy52HFB/IY@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1615480746-28518-1-git-send-email-loic.poulain@linaro.org>

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:39:05PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
> This change introduces initial support for a WWAN subsystem. Given the
> complexity and heterogeneity of existing WWAN hardwares and interfaces,
> there is no strict definition of what a WWAN device is and how it should
> be represented. It's often a collection of multiple components/devices
> that perform the global WWAN feature (netdev, tty, chardev, etc).
> 
> One usual way to expose modem controls and configuration is via high
> level protocols such as the well known AT command protocol, MBIM or
> QMI. The USB modems started to expose that as character devices, and
> user daemons such as ModemManager learnt how to deal with that. This
> initial version adds the concept of WWAN port, which can be registered
> by any driver to expose one of these protocols. The WWAN core takes
> care of the generic part, including character device creation and lets
> the driver implementing access (fops) to the selected protocol.
> 
> Since the different components/devices do no necesserarly know about
> each others, and can be created/removed in different orders, the
> WWAN core ensures that devices being part of the same hardware are
> also represented as a unique WWAN device, relying on the provided
> parent device (e.g. mhi controller, USB device). It's a 'trick' I
> copied from Johannes's earlier WWAN subsystem proposal.
> 
> This initial version is purposely minimalist, it's essentially moving
> the generic part of the previously proposed mhi_wwan_ctrl driver inside
> a common WWAN framework, but the implementation is open and flexible
> enough to allow extension for further drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/Kconfig          |   2 +
>  drivers/net/Makefile         |   1 +
>  drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig     |  19 ++++++
>  drivers/net/wwan/Makefile    |   8 +++
>  drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h |  20 ++++++
>  drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/wwan.h         | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 457 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/wwan.h

What changed from the last version(s)?  That should be below the ---
somewhere, right?

v5?

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11 16:39 [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: Add a WWAN subsystem Loic Poulain
2021-03-11 16:39 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net: Add Qcom WWAN control driver Loic Poulain
2021-03-11 18:58   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-11 16:48 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-03-11 17:14   ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: Add a WWAN subsystem Loic Poulain
2021-03-11 16:48 ` Greg KH
2021-03-11 18:52 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-11 18:52   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YEpJwsSy52HFB/IY@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=aleksander@aleksander.es \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.