From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AE3C433DB for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ECE64FAA for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231278AbhCKXRn (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:17:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60436 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230341AbhCKXRX (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:17:23 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D68C061761 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id t23-20020a0568301e37b02901b65ab30024so473559otr.4 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:17:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=O/1BasX53ustb+YwoFg9cotua8g8c2ln7CwN1aiIWak=; b=TpTmshjru2pTMb8mis7NfOAQYLh14cnY0apwhaLXvUwKbISlNm0PBstBOX33WO8DbH HHeistEMVz07cyObhNaHEXYHssuuazks5S9hW3RJRCXORjHPHqKrkmziPZzxN1gZLUAk NN1Y9i/zMOChSC0Z9ULiYHqaVmytsS09th/E3ZNNwWgKThGvWrRTCuvny0VBhYmzWzvb qT5DVVvGyI+VDO7bbqxygnZXh7VhNlNFWXNxzml5cndHvq6Af3shf+sbcBkrFX/UKpCZ SrxVy2Me7ekhz+aX3OIYAoyZ4/6Hg3qkM4uKo0pnU0/+N3GNgeQ2R0rx0PixtBFctOxg 55EA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=O/1BasX53ustb+YwoFg9cotua8g8c2ln7CwN1aiIWak=; b=dm0QwTBWd7DQw2eiS/Jv2Y2xxNKV2tmaxJIPmgTiMTso2O2hy3cssKAEHtDBO1Rrwy F4YTqr6KRrLEnYvwofPtWbPxGuFcgU4IfR4mh1zbELFIzCNx5rYzqwGvVKXY4poBGl9l TY0IbLsjm4fvYK8iDgXVeeqMoYf0mH9HGeA71weZkWiaoiheh+G28jLWKm4sONAoraHj DrGMq8aOgMLGx9mEXlQQ3twMVAT+t0S7ie0t7sKd/7erfmhch4pDPZlpyn4vszzr7d3g OENIiTR1llCrUfrM77HoALz7sGsAHSFGMiuCrzi0mp9wf8HANS+h4rI7n7ktND2y0td9 NS3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531f++/cxHCwitQf/eprxDetVV/Tiz0yRPcMwSXCrKLJmrXevlbm iTmQxwvnvPmqX7uP/SFvmyn0Wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLGVT09tJ98beiEHxWiFw5lQdBGU01XCFQ73puFX1unASYPnc7E9xq57IjUy4WPenUTsDKOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:15cb:: with SMTP id j11mr1058492otr.126.1615504642482; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from builder.lan (104-57-184-186.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [104.57.184.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m34sm959436otc.25.2021.03.11.15.17.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:17:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:17:20 -0600 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Shawn Guo Cc: Linus Walleij , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: fix number of pins in 'gpio-ranges' Message-ID: References: <20210303033106.549-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20210303033106.549-2-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20210306012829.GL17424@dragon> <20210306080049.GM17424@dragon> <20210311011951.GT17424@dragon> <20210311230924.GX17424@dragon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210311230924.GX17424@dragon> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu 11 Mar 17:09 CST 2021, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:53:49AM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Wed 10 Mar 19:19 CST 2021, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > Yes, DT stops working because of the mismatch between > > > msm_pinctrl_soc_data.ngpio and gpio-ranges. > > > > > > > So what you're saying is that when Linus merged the .set_config patch > > yesterday he broke storage on every single Qualcomm device? > > Better than that. Only the ones that have mismatching between > msm_pinctrl_soc_data.ngpio and gpio-ranges. More specifically, the ones > that the series are fixing. > > I didn't realize this break when I was working on the .set_config change > for ACPI. It was a surprise when I tested DT later. You can ask Linus > to drop .set_config patch, if you do not like this break. But I think > the mismatch issue still needs to be resolved in some way. > We're exposing the UFS as a gpio and I think that these patches therefore are correct, so I've picked them up. But I don't think we should break backwards compatibility will all existing DTBs... Regards, Bjorn