On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:46:08PM -0600, Richard Henderson wrote: > Perform the test against FSCR_SCV at runtime, in the helper. > > This means we can remove the incorrect set against SCV in > ppc_tr_init_disas_context and do not need to add an HFLAGS bit. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > --- > target/ppc/helper.h | 1 + > target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 9 +++++++++ > target/ppc/translate.c | 20 +++++++------------- > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/ppc/helper.h b/target/ppc/helper.h > index 6a4dccf70c..513066d54d 100644 > --- a/target/ppc/helper.h > +++ b/target/ppc/helper.h > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ DEF_HELPER_1(rfci, void, env) > DEF_HELPER_1(rfdi, void, env) > DEF_HELPER_1(rfmci, void, env) > #if defined(TARGET_PPC64) > +DEF_HELPER_2(scv, noreturn, env, i32) > DEF_HELPER_2(pminsn, void, env, i32) > DEF_HELPER_1(rfid, void, env) > DEF_HELPER_1(rfscv, void, env) > diff --git a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c > index 85de7e6c90..5c95e0c103 100644 > --- a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c > +++ b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c > @@ -1130,6 +1130,15 @@ void helper_store_msr(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong val) > } > > #if defined(TARGET_PPC64) > +void helper_scv(CPUPPCState *env, uint32_t lev) > +{ > + if (env->spr[SPR_FSCR] & (1ull << FSCR_SCV)) { > + raise_exception_err(env, POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL_VECTORED, lev); > + } else { > + raise_exception_err(env, POWERPC_EXCP_FU, FSCR_IC_SCV); > + } > +} > + > void helper_pminsn(CPUPPCState *env, powerpc_pm_insn_t insn) > { > CPUState *cs; > diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c > index 7912495f28..d48c554290 100644 > --- a/target/ppc/translate.c > +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c > @@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ struct DisasContext { > bool vsx_enabled; > bool spe_enabled; > bool tm_enabled; > - bool scv_enabled; > bool gtse; > ppc_spr_t *spr_cb; /* Needed to check rights for mfspr/mtspr */ > int singlestep_enabled; > @@ -4081,15 +4080,16 @@ static void gen_sc(DisasContext *ctx) > #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) > static void gen_scv(DisasContext *ctx) > { > - uint32_t lev; > + uint32_t lev = (ctx->opcode >> 5) & 0x7F; > > - if (unlikely(!ctx->scv_enabled)) { > - gen_exception_err(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_FU, FSCR_IC_SCV); > - return; > + /* Set the PC back to the faulting instruction. */ > + if (ctx->exception == POWERPC_EXCP_NONE) { > + gen_update_nip(ctx, ctx->base.pc_next - 4); > } I don't quite understand this. Don't we need the NIP to be on the scv instruction itself for the case where we get a facility unavailable exception, but on the next instruction if we actually take the system call? This appears to be unconditional. > + gen_helper_scv(cpu_env, tcg_constant_i32(lev)); > > - lev = (ctx->opcode >> 5) & 0x7F; > - gen_exception_err(ctx, POWERPC_SYSCALL_VECTORED, lev); > + /* This need not be exact, just not POWERPC_EXCP_NONE */ > + ctx->exception = POWERPC_SYSCALL_VECTORED; > } > #endif > #endif > @@ -7907,12 +7907,6 @@ static void ppc_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs) > ctx->spe_enabled = (hflags >> HFLAGS_SPE) & 1; > ctx->altivec_enabled = (hflags >> HFLAGS_VR) & 1; > ctx->vsx_enabled = (hflags >> HFLAGS_VSX) & 1; > - if ((env->flags & POWERPC_FLAG_SCV) > - && (env->spr[SPR_FSCR] & (1ull << FSCR_SCV))) { > - ctx->scv_enabled = true; > - } else { > - ctx->scv_enabled = false; > - } > ctx->tm_enabled = (hflags >> HFLAGS_TM) & 1; > ctx->gtse = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_GTSE); > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson