From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B00C433C1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBFE61993 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229832AbhCWIyM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 04:54:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60788 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229893AbhCWIxm (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 04:53:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F4FC061574 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 01:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id l4so25735067ejc.10 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 01:53:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TSWIaDu0EOnZXUysXyenekiT8xiS8nS1eGTsxMx/0Y4=; b=ux2OyJTHVBMKeHQb2VnQ+p028P0KhuI61QK/Y4+ylaN9DHcCGXl8+ewtTf8ZL2h1Tt Z3jDqaUykxSPiMYxE8GgO3RlL3DzVMdxDlB/cLp6rCk0a8ZIBZkLshFxCrlYAaydBkAU LKCgEMQ3UMqaEYWg0TX1g0UP1gxlyx3jUARIYX9M+mobLov9LnaQXo+fHKgy/BkUNbCX FohJo59NFme1azbbBFqDAq3TaKUikeHoAa+VcDhof3NZidYD3+9f4JCmgGE/DLa2suOv +9G4GmXxW5LhoDU2yp7CaejxlNGZ1Ja1joeq4eAoQLXECPjyMEF384d6VTAKCY7MvXas LlSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TSWIaDu0EOnZXUysXyenekiT8xiS8nS1eGTsxMx/0Y4=; b=ZfTN5BNsQGXVgSws8PJTiq4kdCU2Q+hi0T0v+9HK3c5IcnQk51BFxaWrXoQ/KTJgQB bBnmCpVN867wc3s4B4X0iOwRm3Ijf7G6zA+m03eT1Fzok52pqE82tsTMSJcIB8j2AMx0 LAib/O+HRaPz4sBUrp+8Kc2JdJ+227CjsjeP/KRvCkjl+hchCSUHPifgLF2Wei6m3Kwo TM4MKjvzW+747YXYz/SS70B7n33wltq2vhHoDKtpYxh/WUMLUWeoYFcIUtdt+dNqGRwG Ejx3+MPpUP6KIyuXiyYkHTLwVa+EMtML2WBcU2LEH2QC2d1WpecO01OpXtGj/V5Ca1LB JavQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EYr/9nIp7JASZY3ZPfqkdMDB8QN/zqo91X5CZcQBfDIQPjGhz GuEzFQB92iHzl0K84JC2Yw0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx15cISdYo3JjRn8StSpOpHXav5CtaVYhU+Y7O1XuyOM/qhU/MtO4+RuA1Bhaws79i2ZM5FIA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1693:: with SMTP id hc19mr3804860ejc.28.1616489619196; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 01:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([62.96.65.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o6sm12552063edw.24.2021.03.23.01.53.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 01:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:53:55 +0100 From: Thierry Reding To: Lee Jones Cc: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] pwm: Patches I consider ready for the next merge window Message-ID: References: <20210319102852.101209-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20210323071929.GD2916463@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="odlMKT3xQKvhsdLj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210323071929.GD2916463@dell> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (98f8cb83) (2021-03-06) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org --odlMKT3xQKvhsdLj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 07:19:29AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Thierry Reding wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:28:38AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > > this is the set of patches that are open on the list for some time. > > > Lee suggested to resend them. > > >=20 > > > @Thierry: I'm unsure what is the best way to nag. Is it really > > > resending? Or does this just result mostly in overhead because the > > > patches are still open in patchwork and it adds copies to your mailbo= x? > > > (Another downside is that taking the patches from this thread results= in > > > recording a newer Author Date compared to picking up the originals.) > >=20 > > I use patchwork extensively for tracking, so merely resending patches so > > that they float to the top of my inbox isn't useful in itself. Patches > > do, by the way, float to the top of my inbox when you just reply to them > > (e.g. by pinging). Resending a particular series is fine because it's > > then easy to mark the old version as "superseded". Sending a collection > > of patch such as this is a bit more annoying because now the duplicates > > are spread about a bit more in patchwork, so it's a bit more work to get > > patchwork cleaned up. But it's not that bad, so no harm done. > >=20 > > Usually when I look at patchwork I will look at the A/F/R/T column and > > the more flags I see there, the more likely I will be to go and apply > > it. Anything else I will go and look at myself and comment and/or apply > > or sometimes wait for someone else to review. > >=20 > > Perhaps a better way to nag me would be to delegate patches that you've > > reviewed or think are ready to me, which would make them stand out more > > among the others. >=20 > It's not Uwe's fault, it's mine. >=20 > Since some of Uwe's patches had been left unreviewed for several > weeks, I asked him to collect up all of his dangling patches and > submit this resend for *me* to review. Like I said, it's not a big deal. And I'm also aware that this is misery of my own making, so no worries. > As someone who does not use Patchwork, I find this to be the simplest > and cleanest method of patch collation. Going by your almost > immediate reply, I guess it had a nice desired side-effect. :) Indeed, it achieved the desired effect, so can't argue about its effectiveness. =3D) Thierry --odlMKT3xQKvhsdLj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEiOrDCAFJzPfAjcif3SOs138+s6EFAmBZrKAACgkQ3SOs138+ s6HqdRAAvgaY8lfS3D3AEOqW7yN0VtUNm9hVXwR04ncssVT2olO0LnxsJ9FWcUyW yPvX2Uc3mc/0NQwW2vppFbUBt7hXw/PEr9vwMTaar3I4+Z/xAMJiaNFXcx3v/hPG 6YUho+sQ179QSdgQNdo2+RMY7m/ZfEew2xtpGPnn68RDRSDSLHraW8AkOAiZy4hU YeNHRYkr5mzRMQUr33bqGBZDYtSpx3xQABxnhrJ5ONbKsx7B02KQQcYTE8XajKDF BnQrITGEBJWtbLVaYedUGSIjjhsp2eFNRmctPJyRsZY39ikHayl5cxcat743ejHC cLWHJcukkTW3Pxa1QyTlK2OSafG67tWQwWKjp+T8FmiJOCQN/Wc1DpuJyEn2idaK LxHPnxAyJrMeEKXWGHCZpBV06PJ9eDkwi/GnC4VFxp21uT5lMfJGzhmM2ZGM/lyI P10dTTSKfriWn+NHfH0GIcnHixCx2CkXBYJeup+bjLXwl5aCNkDmoyCDotkHoRiv WACNcm7uUwp0pq/K8agNV1K7g0tbjoJFxekqR+lMUNFPdNCSCQmMthumvJQuwpeg B0p68braLGLcY9nCXoBuEtwdaw3Sj7azhKG1pY5Y06rK0E74s7yfaRNROConF0NC ry5Fl3me1CmzpfcGlKUe5Wi5lrRmclXHbeUt7RNjqjCx9VPFQpE= =m7ZA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --odlMKT3xQKvhsdLj--