From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9530AC433C1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697D1619B8 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230320AbhCWLSa (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:18:30 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:58596 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229448AbhCWLR6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:17:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616498277; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fEyCPjfB1lRuNmux4TUgSTUDLeSi+0dHPVKsXtM+qB4=; b=RK++CBbhnTgXLzFQJh9QwsWw4njc5WwItevt9kAY/5mQ0f2PQG839xewKJ4oQc771ybHzH xIvt1WqNVkfPA699WMHhml2WkcMMEuAjgUHUIXBGif2eF78SpWfCsGumkbiQrl9U7pjn3G BUec+mUQiDVTpHYr4prFGB9doYI1Z5Y= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-127-0R8p61ecNwGufIGiH6IZ_Q-1; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:17:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0R8p61ecNwGufIGiH6IZ_Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E39B5B361; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-13-171.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.171]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD871002D71; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:17:31 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jeffle Xu , dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 01/13] block: add helper of blk_queue_poll Message-ID: References: <20210318164827.1481133-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20210318164827.1481133-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20210319165241.GA9938@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210319165241.GA9938@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:52:42PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18 2021 at 12:48pm -0400, > Ming Lei wrote: > > > There has been 3 users, and will be more, so add one such helper. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > > Not sure if you're collecting Reviewed-by or Acked-by at this point? > Seems you dropped Chaitanya's Reviewed-by to v1: > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2021-March/msg00166.html Sorry, that should be an accident. > > Do you plan to iterate a lot more before you put out a non-RFC? For > this RFC v2, I'll withhold adding any of my Reviewed-by tags and just > reply where I see things that might need folding into the next > iteration. If no one objects the basic approach taken in V2, I will remove RFC in V3. -- Ming From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE09C433C1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106CE619BD for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:18:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 106CE619BD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616498285; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=fQtJTXTILyJ5fdebM34gh4VxEzjvUioqw8m5p/it8v0=; b=LJLkjkclhF4NtPZ+MwQ0vDiB+cMbiAQBz4S5eGQpjryUZgAG5ZcpRNdC3jLlUFjTljk9Nu VoESPgFWTBRo3xDq9TbDlStzft6dMsuBdV11KOKNh3lMXFX6J/g1QY8udTLMPKNe5oYkZO nejkUkVga+5qZMqlJx4CnZUdluAcTco= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-414-_TW2hS7mN7qdj7QS_IwlEg-1; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:18:03 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _TW2hS7mN7qdj7QS_IwlEg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CD7B801817; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBAE45D9C0; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912431809C83; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 12NBHqeb023318 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:17:52 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 4AAAC10074FC; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-13-171.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.171]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD871002D71; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:17:31 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Mike Snitzer Message-ID: References: <20210318164827.1481133-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20210318164827.1481133-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20210319165241.GA9938@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210319165241.GA9938@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Jeffle Xu , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 01/13] block: add helper of blk_queue_poll X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:52:42PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18 2021 at 12:48pm -0400, > Ming Lei wrote: > > > There has been 3 users, and will be more, so add one such helper. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > > Not sure if you're collecting Reviewed-by or Acked-by at this point? > Seems you dropped Chaitanya's Reviewed-by to v1: > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2021-March/msg00166.html Sorry, that should be an accident. > > Do you plan to iterate a lot more before you put out a non-RFC? For > this RFC v2, I'll withhold adding any of my Reviewed-by tags and just > reply where I see things that might need folding into the next > iteration. If no one objects the basic approach taken in V2, I will remove RFC in V3. -- Ming -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel