From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:50:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFtt0IgJ0lnCxJ0O@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43595c4b-7f3f-f812-b4fe-66c900718e85@oracle.com>
On Wed 24-03-21 09:38:17, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 3/24/21 1:40 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 23-03-21 18:03:07, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Since you brought up cgroups ... what is your opinion on lock hold time
> >> in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline? We could potentially be calling
> >> hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent for every hugetlb page while holding the lock
> >> with interrupts disabled.
> >
> > I am not familiar with hugetlb cgroup code TBH. But from a quick look
> > there is not much of heavy lifting there. If we find out that this is
> > really visible we can do the lock dance with cond_resched and retry with
> > the iteration again. Or is there any strong reason to process the list
> > in a single go?
>
> AFAICT, the primary reason for processing the list in a single go is
> that the lock protects the list. If you drop the lock, the list can
> change ...
>
> I have come up with a (not so pretty) way of processing the list in
> batches of pages. But, I dod not want to introduce that if there is no
> need. Perhaps just take a wait and see approach for now.
>
> I'll see if I can come up with some timing information to determine
> if/when we may have an issue.
I wouldn't bother at this stage. This can be done on top.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-19 22:42 [RFC PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts Mike Kravetz
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] hugetlb: add per-hstate mutex to synchronize user adjustments Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 16:57 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] hugetlb: recompute min_count when dropping hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:07 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 23:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23 7:50 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-23 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-23 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-23 23:18 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-24 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24 16:43 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] hugetlb: create remove_hugetlb_page() to separate functionality Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:15 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 17:01 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: call update_and_free_page without hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:31 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 23:28 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23 7:57 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24 1:03 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-24 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24 16:38 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-24 16:50 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Mike Kravetz
2021-03-21 19:55 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 13:36 ` [hugetlb] cd190f60f9: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/hugetlb.c kernel test robot
2021-03-22 13:36 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-22 13:36 ` [LTP] " kernel test robot
2021-03-22 14:35 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] hugetlb: add update_and_free_page_no_sleep for irq context Mike Kravetz
2021-03-20 1:18 ` Hillf Danton
2021-03-25 0:26 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 17:42 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 18:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-23 18:51 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23 19:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-24 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24 16:53 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 20:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 14:42 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] hugetlb: track hugetlb pages allocated via cma_alloc Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFtt0IgJ0lnCxJ0O@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.