On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote: >Hi, > >On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > >> >> s/varibles/variables/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury >> --- >> Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst >> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst >> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects >> >> Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow >> variables alongside their parent objects. Or a livepatch fix may >> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances. In >> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances. In >> these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach >> shadow variables to parents already in-flight. > >you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it. > Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated .. So.do you have any better policy to keep track??? >Miroslav