From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Merge module sections if and only if CONFIG_LTO_CLANG is enabled
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:07:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGTWdju9UiDGRCCJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202103311228.D42822B@keescook>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:45:36PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:36 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:44 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Merge module sections only when using Clang LTO. With gcc-10, merging
> > > > > > sections does not appear to update the symbol tables for the module,
> > > > > > e.g. 'readelf -s' shows the value that a symbol would have had, if
> > > > > > sections were not merged.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm fine with limiting this to LTO only, but it would be helpful to
> > > > > understand which sections are actually getting merged here.
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't appear to matter which sections get merged, the tables only show the
> > > > correct data if there is no merging whatsoever, e.g. allowing merging for any
> > > > one of the four types (.bss, .data, .rodata and .text) results in breakage.
> > > > AFAICT, merging any sections causes the layout to change and throw off the
> > > > symbol tables.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the clarification. I can reproduce this issue with gcc +
> > > bfd if any of the sections are merged, but gcc + lld produces valid
> > > symbol tables.
> >
> > FWIW, clang + bfd also produces mangled tables, so it does appear to be bfd
> > specific.
>
> Are you able to open a bug against bfd for this?
Yes? I'll ping you when I run into trouble ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-31 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 23:44 [PATCH] kbuild: Merge module sections if and only if CONFIG_LTO_CLANG is enabled Sean Christopherson
2021-03-23 16:19 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-23 16:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-23 18:14 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-24 22:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-31 19:30 ` Kees Cook
2021-03-31 20:07 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-04-01 21:33 ` Kees Cook
2021-03-31 19:56 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YGTWdju9UiDGRCCJ@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.