On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:18:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
> they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
> fixing.) Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do, this
> should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level driver.
> 
> So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

It'd be better to somehow WARN about this instead of silently leaking
the clock reference, but I can't think of a good way to do that, which
would also work in the case where the consumer intentionally left the
PWM enabled, so:

Applied, thanks.

Thierry