From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A91C433ED for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F14B6144B for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240803AbhD2ROp (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:14:45 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:37180 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233302AbhD2ROo (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:14:44 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0a4f007f02d405bcb749ad.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0a:4f00:7f02:d405:bcb7:49ad]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id C799A1EC032C; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:13:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1619716435; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=PyfU4rX/+KMk2UEeM9XF6Ga32+k1ueh3vj9DC0Qq+iM=; b=V4A+ZoyLblJskm8935DQWh1h8C3GGwVWFPtfCynTHww6rJaJvSJ+Rbw2ssMhs/PC3KMXqv 67nDZts2xqqWzmnwUHLcj3efpwcuhxTaFH0HlIufL5daMZseZvemw52NXYqxBCGhRRL0lN sy5+xRNstIKXa7/L9fPI451/L8QtxVU= Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:13:51 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Yu-cheng Yu Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 00/30] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack Message-ID: References: <20210427204315.24153-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210427204315.24153-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 01:42:45PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > I have run tests on these patches for quite some time, and they have been > very stable. While at it, how about adding a simple selftest too, so that people can play with it and perhaps it could even run a bunch of tests? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette