From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AF4C433ED for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AAAF61919 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232051AbhEKSuF (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 14:50:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51708 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231561AbhEKSuE (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 14:50:04 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62DAEC061574; Tue, 11 May 2021 11:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ZkOT+h7IwVrb/g/jzXBMqGF7GJVTbVn2CyQ5yD1dGC0=; b=ob16GH3+IUlXSVCRaH6KiTLg7W KVGr+qMse8+2g2wZdN5XpCzI8gx5fFedBPPM7a0rOUni9p45nSoKas8LoTGRgHGNdkGawym72lhqM wJbSskCAJ6pc2JLqZ19l1wZaFi+zkpp51vBlynJg4PBatQf22v1P4WdbiiA7PqNpj7tXatV247aE2 21UgpSPrBZpRsGMfHIgOaz02Ys+BYCWvtFjxa9JaCK0gBNYJHLasByutmseHgF2XExtnxn+lpHG3w WA3D4PNCmFk+6mL1JXUn9rz1vDUXpsZ/V7mW3lf+BHtLXAPoZnwv53hS1vP1JcbO5oRf8GsV9VHsT j4deW4PQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lgXQY-007ZFN-Mj; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:48:20 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 19:48:18 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Andrew Lunn , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] docs: networking: device_drivers: fix bad usage of UTF-8 chars Message-ID: References: <95eb2a48d0ca3528780ce0dfce64359977fa8cb3.1620744606.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> <8735utdt6z.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8735utdt6z.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:24:52PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Andrew Lunn writes: > > >> -monitoring tools such as ifstat or sar –n DEV [interval] [number of samples] > >> +monitoring tools such as `ifstat` or `sar -n DEV [interval] [number of samples]` > > > > ... > > > >> For example: min_rate 1Gbit 3Gbit: Verify bandwidth limit using network > >> -monitoring tools such as ifstat or sar –n DEV [interval] [number of samples] > >> +monitoring tools such as ``ifstat`` or ``sar -n DEV [interval] [number of samples]`` > > > > Is there a difference between ` and `` ? Does it make sense to be > > consistent? > > This is `just weird quotes` umm ... `this` is supposed to be "interpreted text" https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#inline-markup Maybe we don't actually interpret it. > This is ``literal text`` set in monospace in processed output. > > There is a certain tension between those who want to see liberal use of > literal-text markup, and those who would rather have less markup in the > text overall; certainly, it's better not to go totally nuts with it. I really appreciate the work you did to reduce the amount of markup that's needed! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 19:48:18 +0100 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 5/5] docs: networking: device_drivers: fix bad usage of UTF-8 chars In-Reply-To: <8735utdt6z.fsf@meer.lwn.net> References: <95eb2a48d0ca3528780ce0dfce64359977fa8cb3.1620744606.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> <8735utdt6z.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:24:52PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Andrew Lunn writes: > > >> -monitoring tools such as ifstat or sar ?n DEV [interval] [number of samples] > >> +monitoring tools such as `ifstat` or `sar -n DEV [interval] [number of samples]` > > > > ... > > > >> For example: min_rate 1Gbit 3Gbit: Verify bandwidth limit using network > >> -monitoring tools such as ifstat or sar ?n DEV [interval] [number of samples] > >> +monitoring tools such as ``ifstat`` or ``sar -n DEV [interval] [number of samples]`` > > > > Is there a difference between ` and `` ? Does it make sense to be > > consistent? > > This is `just weird quotes` umm ... `this` is supposed to be "interpreted text" https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#inline-markup Maybe we don't actually interpret it. > This is ``literal text`` set in monospace in processed output. > > There is a certain tension between those who want to see liberal use of > literal-text markup, and those who would rather have less markup in the > text overall; certainly, it's better not to go totally nuts with it. I really appreciate the work you did to reduce the amount of markup that's needed!