From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71566C41515 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 20:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C8561420 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 20:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345162AbhELUNH (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2021 16:13:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33790 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1376579AbhELSzJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2021 14:55:09 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5311611BD; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:53:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1620845640; bh=0v11jeez54FneOK7W+JHdJ88FtBJC12awhEy2sMyl+w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LQAx1WTbfrd/rYLoXyh97Re6e8HL2bqQzU+eQCqTCzTTP0Q+E0hx68NMBmgnFxyp5 Yd53+drZw06vxLeL8HUpQrWNg7YlzEdtRqctl8gtLwAX9uOuGSy/MWHrro4Kwk2XFw 7Je5lxvRZL6MXHonw/Fvnx0+J++J4KmtdMgP2Gl8= Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 20:53:57 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Alexandru Elisei , Naresh Kamboju , open list , Shuah Khan , Florian Fainelli , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Jon Hunter , linux-stable , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck , Linux ARM , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/244] 5.4.119-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20210512144743.039977287@linuxfoundation.org> <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 06:02:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2021 18:00:16 +0100, > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > > > Hi Naresh, > > > > Thank you for the report! > > > > On 5/12/21 5:47 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 20:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.119 release. > > >> There are 244 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > >> let me know. > > >> > > >> Responses should be made by Fri, 14 May 2021 14:47:09 +0000. > > >> Anything received after that time might be too late. > > >> > > >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.119-rc1.gz > > >> or in the git tree and branch at: > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > >> and the diffstat can be found below. > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> > > >> greg k-h > > > Build regression detected. > > > > > >> Alexandru Elisei > > >> KVM: arm64: Initialize VCPU mdcr_el2 before loading it > > > stable rc 5.4 arm axm55xx_defconfig builds failed due to these > > > warnings / errors. > > > - arm (axm55xx_defconfig) with gcc-8,9 and 10 failed > > > > > > arch/arm/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/arm.c: In function 'kvm_vcpu_first_run_init': > > > arch/arm/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/arm.c:582:2: error: implicit > > > declaration of function 'kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug'; did you mean > > > 'kvm_arm_init_debug'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu); > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > kvm_arm_init_debug > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > > This is my fault, in Linux v5.4 KVM for arm is still around, and > > there's no prototype for the function when compiling for arm. I > > suspect that's also the case for v4.19. > > > > I made this change to get it to build: > > > > $ git diff > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > index dd03d5e01a94..32564b017ba0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > int cpu) {} > >  static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > >   > >  static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {} > > +static inline void kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > >  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > >  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > >  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > > > which matches the stub for kvm_arm_init_debug(). I can spin a patch > > out of it and send it for 5.4 and 4.19. Marc, what do you think? > > Ideally, we'd drop the patch in its current form from 5.4 and 4.19, > and send an updated patch with this hunk to fix the 32bit build. > That would be great. Do you want to do it for this set of releases (i.e. today/tomorrow) or have me just drop this now and someone will send me an updated version later when they get a chance? thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F31C433ED for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2369F613B9 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2369F613B9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689C94B516; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:54:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@linuxfoundation.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJYoJ-J5h+No; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:54:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC5B4B52E; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:54:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129C74B516 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:54:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xswTBQgo4ty for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:54:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA5BB4B515 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:54:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5311611BD; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:53:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1620845640; bh=0v11jeez54FneOK7W+JHdJ88FtBJC12awhEy2sMyl+w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LQAx1WTbfrd/rYLoXyh97Re6e8HL2bqQzU+eQCqTCzTTP0Q+E0hx68NMBmgnFxyp5 Yd53+drZw06vxLeL8HUpQrWNg7YlzEdtRqctl8gtLwAX9uOuGSy/MWHrro4Kwk2XFw 7Je5lxvRZL6MXHonw/Fvnx0+J++J4KmtdMgP2Gl8= Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 20:53:57 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/244] 5.4.119-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20210512144743.039977287@linuxfoundation.org> <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org> Cc: Linux ARM , Florian Fainelli , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-stable , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Jon Hunter , Shuah Khan , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Guenter Roeck X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 06:02:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2021 18:00:16 +0100, > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > = > > Hi Naresh, > > = > > Thank you for the report! > > = > > On 5/12/21 5:47 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 20:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.119 release. > > >> There are 244 patches in this series, all will be posted as a respon= se > > >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, ple= ase > > >> let me know. > > >> > > >> Responses should be made by Fri, 14 May 2021 14:47:09 +0000. > > >> Anything received after that time might be too late. > > >> > > >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/p= atch-5.4.119-rc1.gz > > >> or in the git tree and branch at: > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-s= table-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > >> and the diffstat can be found below. > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> > > >> greg k-h > > > Build regression detected. > > > > > >> Alexandru Elisei > > >> KVM: arm64: Initialize VCPU mdcr_el2 before loading it > > > stable rc 5.4 arm axm55xx_defconfig builds failed due to these > > > warnings / errors. > > > - arm (axm55xx_defconfig) with gcc-8,9 and 10 failed > > > > > > arch/arm/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/arm.c: In function 'kvm_vcpu_first= _run_init': > > > arch/arm/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/arm.c:582:2: error: implicit > > > declaration of function 'kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug'; did you mean > > > 'kvm_arm_init_debug'? [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > > > kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu); > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > kvm_arm_init_debug > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > = > > This is my fault, in Linux v5.4 KVM for arm is still around, and > > there's no prototype for the function when compiling for arm. I > > suspect that's also the case for v4.19. > > = > > I made this change to get it to build: > > = > > $ git diff > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm= _host.h > > index dd03d5e01a94..32564b017ba0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcp= u *vcpu, > > int cpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)= {} > > =A0 > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {} > > +static inline void kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > = > > which matches the stub for kvm_arm_init_debug(). I can spin a patch > > out of it and send it for 5.4 and 4.19. Marc, what do you think? > = > Ideally, we'd drop the patch in its current form from 5.4 and 4.19, > and send an updated patch with this hunk to fix the 32bit build. > = That would be great. Do you want to do it for this set of releases (i.e. today/tomorrow) or have me just drop this now and someone will send me an updated version later when they get a chance? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855C6C433B4 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58026008E for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:56:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C58026008E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=W6GuZegjaHZS7XURSuWnqEFv/UWFxPYiPyFinJGXxAY=; b=o6RfkmBbwICIswDmota/xRCmy Rzfk+l9k+3w23AKesGvGhWbqpm894XoYJmHSdbqfvHKq8h2mUuIfKuhsSxOTU1iFUmv/Gv3HqgWwN YvBIvL7aDtoKO3q7SkkMSc0izUQuhErmh7KFEGNvUAsvQ0M4uqpHRtyERngoDYjC4UqhIhavrbYvJ x+a4a6+4PFn9cBCa0zDThPK7Daw8BvwmSdpRLlQ8g0sGcxrSmSpXc2BXiyIT9TDTC1hubMhnwKawQ HrXJju5A60jIf4Nl/q/sSB0nf4zPa7SJmNcq0ndaOd8r4ht9ipdbtlPiMq4mNMR/XFz+3X3QWuuIL xYAUiLjKA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lgtzi-003j2Q-AG; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:54:06 +0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lgtzg-003j2C-AO for linux-arm-kernel@desiato.infradead.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:54:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=rmJlWJlO47C9zjVQEtSupGyQ3ZKXj2KrTxt/5MdcG4g=; b=1LrQXA/Nwq3z/N6FfcA71wdNFk 6ifRo2/sV8JIC1B1EyLh6Zvm7seNkzuWcG7xhdVOtIPZP7TK5+SWGJY2f2P3J9h03mCwfwHXL8uvZ Yu/mJQ4nI3sQjb1Z6XRd9OU2DHov3OVY6XurkaoXhcTYT0qhKL3PZ0CXPKILUfAlzSq/pgPH/z3Xq D7V7G95WxaglpCepAjz10Uf714KdqyreHFbfa6gd+MdH0BWiWns6atj6wlXBzswFRUafYyMk3gPFJ QG3r99jUgiM/H1UK/jG5Yl+NkEd3qnhLx9+phcawDGAdsiOqrCN2LahDGsskydWRfA5EOwo67Zzef er+glr9A==; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lgtzd-00AjQX-GB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:54:03 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5311611BD; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:53:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1620845640; bh=0v11jeez54FneOK7W+JHdJ88FtBJC12awhEy2sMyl+w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LQAx1WTbfrd/rYLoXyh97Re6e8HL2bqQzU+eQCqTCzTTP0Q+E0hx68NMBmgnFxyp5 Yd53+drZw06vxLeL8HUpQrWNg7YlzEdtRqctl8gtLwAX9uOuGSy/MWHrro4Kwk2XFw 7Je5lxvRZL6MXHonw/Fvnx0+J++J4KmtdMgP2Gl8= Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 20:53:57 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Alexandru Elisei , Naresh Kamboju , open list , Shuah Khan , Florian Fainelli , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Jon Hunter , linux-stable , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck , Linux ARM , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/244] 5.4.119-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20210512144743.039977287@linuxfoundation.org> <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210512_115401_635175_9C4693ED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 36.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 06:02:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2021 18:00:16 +0100, > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > = > > Hi Naresh, > > = > > Thank you for the report! > > = > > On 5/12/21 5:47 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 20:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.119 release. > > >> There are 244 patches in this series, all will be posted as a respon= se > > >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, ple= ase > > >> let me know. > > >> > > >> Responses should be made by Fri, 14 May 2021 14:47:09 +0000. > > >> Anything received after that time might be too late. > > >> > > >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/p= atch-5.4.119-rc1.gz > > >> or in the git tree and branch at: > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-s= table-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > >> and the diffstat can be found below. > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> > > >> greg k-h > > > Build regression detected. > > > > > >> Alexandru Elisei > > >> KVM: arm64: Initialize VCPU mdcr_el2 before loading it > > > stable rc 5.4 arm axm55xx_defconfig builds failed due to these > > > warnings / errors. > > > - arm (axm55xx_defconfig) with gcc-8,9 and 10 failed > > > > > > arch/arm/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/arm.c: In function 'kvm_vcpu_first= _run_init': > > > arch/arm/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/arm.c:582:2: error: implicit > > > declaration of function 'kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug'; did you mean > > > 'kvm_arm_init_debug'? [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > > > kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu); > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > kvm_arm_init_debug > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > = > > This is my fault, in Linux v5.4 KVM for arm is still around, and > > there's no prototype for the function when compiling for arm. I > > suspect that's also the case for v4.19. > > = > > I made this change to get it to build: > > = > > $ git diff > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm= _host.h > > index dd03d5e01a94..32564b017ba0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcp= u *vcpu, > > int cpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)= {} > > =A0 > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {} > > +static inline void kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > =A0static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > = > > which matches the stub for kvm_arm_init_debug(). I can spin a patch > > out of it and send it for 5.4 and 4.19. Marc, what do you think? > = > Ideally, we'd drop the patch in its current form from 5.4 and 4.19, > and send an updated patch with this hunk to fix the 32bit build. > = That would be great. Do you want to do it for this set of releases (i.e. today/tomorrow) or have me just drop this now and someone will send me an updated version later when they get a chance? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel