All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
@ 2021-04-27 16:12 Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
                   ` (24 more replies)
  0 siblings, 25 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

This is v2 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a
kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series.

This patchset is based mostly on tag v5.12-rc8-mmots-2021-04-21-23-08, however
I dropped some patches there otherwise I'll get some weird build errors.  I
think I should have kept most of the -mm-next materials, so hopefully when
Andrew gets a new -mm tree, this series can be applied cleanly upon it.  I'll
respin otherwise.

The whole series can also be found online [1].

The major change from v1->v2 is that I dropped the FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP flag in
previous v1, as I think it's not needed and checking of the flag:

  vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP

Can be replaced safely by:

  pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(vmf->orig_pte)

So we don't need to introduce yet another flag, and the code actually even
shrinked a few more lines, which is good.

Also per discussion with Mike, I dropped the READ emulation when a thread
faulted on a uffd-wp special swap pte, as I'll keep the WRITE fault as is in
this series.

Nothing big really changed otherwise.  Full changelog listed below.

v2:
- Add R-bs
- Added patch "mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from
  hugetlb.h" as noticed/suggested by Mike Kravets
- Fix commit message of patch "hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special
  pte if required" [MikeK]
- Removing comments for fields in zap_details since they're either incorrect or
  not helping [Matthew]
- Rephrase commit message in patch "hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of
  UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP" to explain better on why set dirty bit for UFFDIO_COPY
  in hugetlbfs [MikeK]
- Don't emulate READ for uffd-wp-special on both shmem & hugetlbfs.
- Drop FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP flag, by checking vmf->orig_pte directly against
  pte_swp_uffd_wp_special()
- Fix race condition of page fault handling on uffd-wp-special [Mike]

About Swap Special PTE
======================

In short, the so-called "swap special pte" in this patchset is a new type of
pte that doesn't exist in the past, but it got used initially in this series in
file-backed memories.  It is used to persist information even if the ptes got
dropped meanwhile when the page cache still existed.  For example, when
splitting a file-backed huge pmd, we could be simply dropping the pmd entry
then wait until another fault coming.  It's okay in the past since all
information in the pte can be retained from the page cache when the next page
fault triggers.  However in this case, uffd-wp is per-pte information which
cannot be kept in page cache, so that information needs to be maintained
somehow still in the pgtable entry, even if the pgtable entry is going to be
dropped.  Here instead of replacing with a none entry, we used the "swap
special pte".  Then when the next page fault triggers, we can observe orig_pte
to retain this information.

I'm copy-pasting some commit message from the patch "mm/swap: Introduce the
idea of special swap ptes", where it tried to explain this pte in another angle:

    We used to have special swap entries, like migration entries, hw-poison
    entries, device private entries, etc.

    Those "special swap entries" reside in the range that they need to be at least
    swap entries first, and their types are decided by swp_type(entry).

    This patch introduces another idea called "special swap ptes".

    It's very easy to get confused against "special swap entries", but a speical
    swap pte should never contain a swap entry at all.  It means, it's illegal to
    call pte_to_swp_entry() upon a special swap pte.

    Make the uffd-wp special pte to be the first special swap pte.

    Before this patch, is_swap_pte()==true means one of the below:

       (a.1) The pte has a normal swap entry (non_swap_entry()==false).  For
             example, when an anonymous page got swapped out.

       (a.2) The pte has a special swap entry (non_swap_entry()==true).  For
             example, a migration entry, a hw-poison entry, etc.

    After this patch, is_swap_pte()==true means one of the below, where case (b) is
    added:

     (a) The pte contains a swap entry.

       (a.1) The pte has a normal swap entry (non_swap_entry()==false).  For
             example, when an anonymous page got swapped out.

       (a.2) The pte has a special swap entry (non_swap_entry()==true).  For
             example, a migration entry, a hw-poison entry, etc.

     (b) The pte does not contain a swap entry at all (so it cannot be passed
         into pte_to_swp_entry()).  For example, uffd-wp special swap pte.

Hugetlbfs needs similar thing because it's also file-backed.  I directly reused
the same special pte there, though the shmem/hugetlb change on supporting this
new pte is different since they don't share code path a lot.

Patch layout
============

Part (1): Shmem support, this is where the special swap pte is introduced.
Some zap rework is needed within the process:

  shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP
  mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns
  mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem
  mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes
  shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler
  mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details
  mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags
  mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP
  mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages()
  shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed
  shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem
  shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps
  shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes
  shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork()

Part (2): Hugetlb support, we need to disable huge pmd sharing for uffd-wp
because not compatible just like uffd minor mode.  The rest is the changes
required to teach hugetlbfs understand the special swap pte too that introduced
with the uffd-wp change:

  mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT
  hugetlb: Pass vma into huge_pte_alloc()
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Forbid huge pmd sharing when uffd enabled
  mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers
  mm/hugetlb: Move flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() into hugetlb.h
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wp
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required

Part (3): Enable both features in code and test

  userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs
  userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs

Tests
=====

I've tested it using either userfaultfd kselftest program, but also with
umapsort [2] which should be even stricter.  Tested page swapping in/out during
umapsort.

If anyone would like to try umapsort, need to use an extremely hacked version
of umap library [3], because by default umap only supports anonymous.  So to
test it we need to build [3] then [2].

Any comment would be greatly welcomed.  Thanks,

[1] https://github.com/xzpeter/linux/tree/uffd-wp-shmem-hugetlbfs
[2] https://github.com/LLNL/umap-apps
[3] https://github.com/xzpeter/umap/tree/peter-shmem-hugetlbfs

Peter Xu (24):
  shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP
  mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns
  mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem
  mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes
  shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler
  mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details
  mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags
  mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP
  mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages()
  shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed
  shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem
  shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on
    thps
  shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes
  shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork()
  mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT
  mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes
  hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required
  mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs
  userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs

 arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c                  |   2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h           |  28 +++
 fs/dax.c                                 |  10 +-
 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c                     |  15 +-
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c                       |  14 +-
 fs/userfaultfd.c                         |  39 ++--
 include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h            |  10 +
 include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h       |   3 +
 include/linux/hugetlb.h                  |  30 ++-
 include/linux/mm.h                       |  48 ++++-
 include/linux/mm_inline.h                |  43 +++++
 include/linux/shmem_fs.h                 |   5 +-
 include/linux/swapops.h                  |  39 +++-
 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h            |  47 +++++
 include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h         |   7 +-
 mm/gup.c                                 |   2 +-
 mm/hmm.c                                 |   2 +-
 mm/hugetlb.c                             | 160 +++++++++++++---
 mm/khugepaged.c                          |  14 +-
 mm/madvise.c                             |   4 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c                          |   2 +-
 mm/memory.c                              | 226 +++++++++++++++++------
 mm/migrate.c                             |   4 +-
 mm/mincore.c                             |   2 +-
 mm/mprotect.c                            |  63 ++++++-
 mm/mremap.c                              |   2 +-
 mm/page_vma_mapped.c                     |   6 +-
 mm/rmap.c                                |   8 +
 mm/shmem.c                               |  40 +++-
 mm/swapfile.c                            |   2 +-
 mm/truncate.c                            |  17 +-
 mm/userfaultfd.c                         |  37 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c |   9 +-
 33 files changed, 753 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 01/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns Peter Xu
                   ` (23 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Firstly, pass wp_copy into shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() through the stack.
Then apply the UFFD_WP bit properly when the UFFDIO_COPY on shmem is with
UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP.

One thing to mention is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() needs to set the dirty
bit in pte even if UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP is set.  The reason is similar to
dcf7fe9d8976 ("userfaultfd: shmem: UFFDIO_COPY: set the page dirty if VM_WRITE
is not set") where we need to set page as dirty even if VM_WRITE is no there.
It's just that shmem can drop the pte any time later, and if it's not dirty the
data will be dropped.  For uffd-wp, that could lead to data loss if without the
dirty bit set.

Note that shmem_mfill_zeropage_pte() will always call shmem_mfill_atomic_pte()
with wp_copy==false because UFFDIO_ZEROCOPY does not support UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/shmem_fs.h |  5 +++--
 mm/shmem.c               | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 mm/userfaultfd.c         |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
index d82b6f3965885..a21eb25183d02 100644
--- a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
@@ -127,14 +127,15 @@ extern int shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, pmd_t *dst_pmd,
 				  struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
 				  unsigned long dst_addr,
 				  unsigned long src_addr,
-				  struct page **pagep);
+				  struct page **pagep,
+				  bool wp_copy);
 extern int shmem_mfill_zeropage_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 				    pmd_t *dst_pmd,
 				    struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
 				    unsigned long dst_addr);
 #else
 #define shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pte, dst_vma, dst_addr, \
-			       src_addr, pagep)        ({ BUG(); 0; })
+			       src_addr, pagep, wp_copy)    ({ BUG(); 0; })
 #define shmem_mfill_zeropage_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_vma, \
 				 dst_addr)      ({ BUG(); 0; })
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 26c76b13ad233..8fbf7680f044c 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2360,7 +2360,8 @@ static int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 				  unsigned long dst_addr,
 				  unsigned long src_addr,
 				  bool zeropage,
-				  struct page **pagep)
+				  struct page **pagep,
+				  bool wp_copy)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(dst_vma->vm_file);
 	struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
@@ -2422,9 +2423,18 @@ static int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 		goto out_release;
 
 	_dst_pte = mk_pte(page, dst_vma->vm_page_prot);
-	if (dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
-		_dst_pte = pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(_dst_pte));
-	else {
+	if (dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) {
+		if (wp_copy)
+			_dst_pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte_wrprotect(_dst_pte));
+		else
+			_dst_pte = pte_mkwrite(_dst_pte);
+		/*
+		 * Similar reason to set_page_dirty(), that we need to mark the
+		 * pte dirty even if wp_copy==true here, otherwise the pte and
+		 * its page could be dropped at anytime when e.g. swapped out.
+		 */
+		_dst_pte = pte_mkdirty(_dst_pte);
+	} else {
 		/*
 		 * We don't set the pte dirty if the vma has no
 		 * VM_WRITE permission, so mark the page dirty or it
@@ -2482,10 +2492,12 @@ int shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 			   struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
 			   unsigned long dst_addr,
 			   unsigned long src_addr,
-			   struct page **pagep)
+			   struct page **pagep,
+			   bool wp_copy)
 {
 	return shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_vma,
-				      dst_addr, src_addr, false, pagep);
+				      dst_addr, src_addr, false, pagep,
+				      wp_copy);
 }
 
 int shmem_mfill_zeropage_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
@@ -2496,7 +2508,8 @@ int shmem_mfill_zeropage_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 	struct page *page = NULL;
 
 	return shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_vma,
-				      dst_addr, 0, true, &page);
+				      dst_addr, 0, true, &page,
+				      false);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index e14b3820c6a81..7adaebe222b8e 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 		if (!zeropage)
 			err = shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd,
 						     dst_vma, dst_addr,
-						     src_addr, page);
+						     src_addr, page, wp_copy);
 		else
 			err = shmem_mfill_zeropage_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd,
 						       dst_vma, dst_addr);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 02/24] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Peter Xu
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

pte_unmap_same() will always unmap the pte pointer.  After the unmap, vmf->pte
will not be valid any more.  We should clear it.

It was safe only because no one is accessing vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same()
returns, since the only caller of pte_unmap_same() (so far) is do_swap_page(),
where vmf->pte will in most cases be overwritten very soon.

pte_unmap_same() will be used in other places in follow up patches, so that
vmf->pte will not always be re-written.  This patch enables us to call
functions like finish_fault() because that'll conditionally unmap the pte by
checking vmf->pte first.  Or, alloc_set_pte() will make sure to allocate a new
pte even after calling pte_unmap_same().

Since we'll need to modify vmf->pte, directly pass in vmf into pte_unmap_same()
and then we can also avoid the long parameter list.

Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index ffda19542bc6d..955a0bb6b855c 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2618,19 +2618,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apply_to_existing_page_range);
  * proceeding (but do_wp_page is only called after already making such a check;
  * and do_anonymous_page can safely check later on).
  */
-static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
-				pte_t *page_table, pte_t orig_pte)
+static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	int same = 1;
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
 	if (sizeof(pte_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) {
-		spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
+		spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
 		spin_lock(ptl);
-		same = pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte);
+		same = pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte);
 		spin_unlock(ptl);
 	}
 #endif
-	pte_unmap(page_table);
+	pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+	/* After unmap of pte, the pointer is invalid now - clear it. */
+	vmf->pte = NULL;
 	return same;
 }
 
@@ -3319,7 +3320,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
 	void *shadow = NULL;
 
-	if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))
+	if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
 		goto out;
 
 	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 03/24] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes Peter Xu
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

This patch introduces a very special swap-like pte for file-backed memories.

Currently it's only defined for x86_64 only, but as long as any arch that can
properly define the UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL value as requested, it should
conceptually work too.

We will use this special pte to arm the ptes that got either unmapped or
swapped out for a file-backed region that was previously wr-protected.  This
special pte could trigger a page fault just like swap entries, and as long as
the page fault will satisfy pte_none()==false && pte_present()==false.

Then we can revive the special pte into a normal pte backed by the page cache.

This idea is greatly inspired by Hugh and Andrea in the discussion, which is
referenced in the links below.

The other idea (from Hugh) is that we use swp_type==1 and swp_offset=0 as the
special pte.  The current solution (as pointed out by Andrea) is slightly
preferred in that we don't even need swp_entry_t knowledge at all in trapping
these accesses.  Meanwhile, we also reuse _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP from the anonymous
swp entries.

This patch only introduces the special pte and its operators.  It's not yet
applied to have any functional difference.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201126222359.8120-1-peterx@redhat.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201130230603.46187-1-peterx@redhat.com/
Suggested-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h     | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h |  3 +++
 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h      | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
index a02c67291cfcb..379bae343dd16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -1329,6 +1329,34 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_swp_clear_soft_dirty(pmd_t pmd)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
+
+/*
+ * This is a very special swap-like pte that marks this pte as "wr-protected"
+ * by userfaultfd-wp.  It should only exist for file-backed memory where the
+ * page (previously got wr-protected) has been unmapped or swapped out.
+ *
+ * For anonymous memories, the userfaultfd-wp _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP bit is kept
+ * along with a real swp entry instead.
+ *
+ * Let's make some rules for this special pte:
+ *
+ * (1) pte_none()==false, so that it'll not trigger a missing page fault.
+ *
+ * (2) pte_present()==false, so that it's recognized as swap (is_swap_pte).
+ *
+ * (3) pte_swp_uffd_wp()==true, so it can be tested just like a swap pte that
+ *     contains a valid swap entry, so that we can check a swap pte always
+ *     using "is_swap_pte() && pte_swp_uffd_wp()" without caring about whether
+ *     there's one swap entry inside of the pte.
+ *
+ * (4) It should not be a valid swap pte anywhere, so that when we see this pte
+ *     we know it does not contain a swap entry.
+ *
+ * For x86, the simplest special pte which satisfies all of above should be the
+ * pte with only _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP bit set (where swp_type==swp_offset==0).
+ */
+#define  UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL  __pte(_PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP)
+
 static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte)
 {
 	return pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP);
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h
index 828966d4c2811..95e9811ce9d1f 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
 #define _ASM_GENERIC_PGTABLE_UFFD_H
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
+
+#define  UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL  __pte(0)
+
 static __always_inline int pte_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
index 794d1538b8bac..bc733512c6905 100644
--- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
+++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
@@ -140,6 +140,17 @@ extern int userfaultfd_unmap_prep(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 extern void userfaultfd_unmap_complete(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				       struct list_head *uf);
 
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(vma_is_anonymous(vma));
+	return UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL;
+}
+
+static inline bool pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return pte_same(pte, UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL);
+}
+
 #else /* CONFIG_USERFAULTFD */
 
 /* mm helpers */
@@ -229,6 +240,16 @@ static inline void userfaultfd_unmap_complete(struct mm_struct *mm,
 {
 }
 
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	return __pte(0);
+}
+
+static inline bool pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_USERFAULTFD */
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_USERFAULTFD_K_H */
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 04/24] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

We used to have special swap entries, like migration entries, hw-poison
entries, device private entries, etc.

Those "special swap entries" reside in the range that they need to be at least
swap entries first, and their types are decided by swp_type(entry).

This patch introduces another idea called "special swap ptes".

It's very easy to get confused against "special swap entries", but a speical
swap pte should never contain a swap entry at all.  It means, it's illegal to
call pte_to_swp_entry() upon a special swap pte.

Make the uffd-wp special pte to be the first special swap pte.

Before this patch, is_swap_pte()==true means one of the below:

   (a.1) The pte has a normal swap entry (non_swap_entry()==false).  For
         example, when an anonymous page got swapped out.

   (a.2) The pte has a special swap entry (non_swap_entry()==true).  For
         example, a migration entry, a hw-poison entry, etc.

After this patch, is_swap_pte()==true means one of the below, where case (b) is
added:

 (a) The pte contains a swap entry.

   (a.1) The pte has a normal swap entry (non_swap_entry()==false).  For
         example, when an anonymous page got swapped out.

   (a.2) The pte has a special swap entry (non_swap_entry()==true).  For
         example, a migration entry, a hw-poison entry, etc.

 (b) The pte does not contain a swap entry at all (so it cannot be passed
     into pte_to_swp_entry()).  For example, uffd-wp special swap pte.

Teach the whole mm core about this new idea.  It's done by introducing another
helper called pte_has_swap_entry() which stands for case (a.1) and (a.2).
Before this patch, it will be the same as is_swap_pte() because there's no
special swap pte yet.  Now for most of the previous use of is_swap_entry() in
mm core, we'll need to use the new helper pte_has_swap_entry() instead, to make
sure we won't try to parse a swap entry from a swap special pte (which does not
contain a swap entry at all!).  We either handle the swap special pte, or it'll
naturally use the default "else" paths.

Warn properly (e.g., in do_swap_page()) when we see a special swap pte - we
should never call do_swap_page() upon those ptes, but just to bail out early if
it happens.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c |  2 +-
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c      | 14 ++++++++------
 include/linux/swapops.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 mm/gup.c                |  2 +-
 mm/hmm.c                |  2 +-
 mm/khugepaged.c         | 11 ++++++++++-
 mm/madvise.c            |  4 ++--
 mm/memcontrol.c         |  2 +-
 mm/memory.c             |  7 +++++++
 mm/migrate.c            |  4 ++--
 mm/mincore.c            |  2 +-
 mm/mprotect.c           |  2 +-
 mm/mremap.c             |  2 +-
 mm/page_vma_mapped.c    |  6 +++---
 mm/swapfile.c           |  2 +-
 15 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
index b3c70a612c7a9..ebe213cba9136 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void mte_sync_page_tags(struct page *page, pte_t *ptep, bool check_swap)
 {
 	pte_t old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
 
-	if (check_swap && is_swap_pte(old_pte)) {
+	if (check_swap && pte_has_swap_entry(old_pte)) {
 		swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(old_pte);
 
 		if (!non_swap_entry(entry) && mte_restore_tags(entry, page))
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index fc9784544b241..4c95cc57a66a8 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static void smaps_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
 
 	if (pte_present(*pte)) {
 		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, *pte);
-	} else if (is_swap_pte(*pte)) {
+	} else if (pte_has_swap_entry(*pte)) {
 		swp_entry_t swpent = pte_to_swp_entry(*pte);
 
 		if (!non_swap_entry(swpent)) {
@@ -518,8 +518,10 @@ static void smaps_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
 			page = migration_entry_to_page(swpent);
 		else if (is_device_private_entry(swpent))
 			page = device_private_entry_to_page(swpent);
-	} else if (unlikely(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHMEM) && mss->check_shmem_swap
-							&& pte_none(*pte))) {
+	} else if (unlikely(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHMEM) &&
+			    mss->check_shmem_swap &&
+			    /* Here swap special pte is the same as none pte */
+			    (pte_none(*pte) || is_swap_special_pte(*pte)))) {
 		page = xa_load(&vma->vm_file->f_mapping->i_pages,
 						linear_page_index(vma, addr));
 		if (xa_is_value(page))
@@ -691,7 +693,7 @@ static int smaps_hugetlb_range(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
 
 	if (pte_present(*pte)) {
 		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, *pte);
-	} else if (is_swap_pte(*pte)) {
+	} else if (pte_has_swap_entry(*pte)) {
 		swp_entry_t swpent = pte_to_swp_entry(*pte);
 
 		if (is_migration_entry(swpent))
@@ -1075,7 +1077,7 @@ static inline void clear_soft_dirty(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		ptent = pte_wrprotect(old_pte);
 		ptent = pte_clear_soft_dirty(ptent);
 		ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, pte, old_pte, ptent);
-	} else if (is_swap_pte(ptent)) {
+	} else if (pte_has_swap_entry(ptent)) {
 		ptent = pte_swp_clear_soft_dirty(ptent);
 		set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, ptent);
 	}
@@ -1375,7 +1377,7 @@ static pagemap_entry_t pte_to_pagemap_entry(struct pagemapread *pm,
 		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pte);
 		if (pte_soft_dirty(pte))
 			flags |= PM_SOFT_DIRTY;
-	} else if (is_swap_pte(pte)) {
+	} else if (pte_has_swap_entry(pte)) {
 		swp_entry_t entry;
 		if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(pte))
 			flags |= PM_SOFT_DIRTY;
diff --git a/include/linux/swapops.h b/include/linux/swapops.h
index 7dd57303bb0c3..7b7387d2892ff 100644
--- a/include/linux/swapops.h
+++ b/include/linux/swapops.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <linux/radix-tree.h>
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <linux/mm_types.h>
+#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 
@@ -52,12 +53,48 @@ static inline pgoff_t swp_offset(swp_entry_t entry)
 	return entry.val & SWP_OFFSET_MASK;
 }
 
-/* check whether a pte points to a swap entry */
+/*
+ * is_swap_pte() returns true for three cases:
+ *
+ * (a) The pte contains a swap entry.
+ *
+ *   (a.1) The pte has a normal swap entry (non_swap_entry()==false).  For
+ *         example, when an anonymous page got swapped out.
+ *
+ *   (a.2) The pte has a special swap entry (non_swap_entry()==true).  For
+ *         example, a migration entry, a hw-poison entry, etc.
+ *
+ * (b) The pte does not contain a swap entry at all (so it cannot be passed
+ *     into pte_to_swp_entry()).  For example, uffd-wp special swap pte.
+ */
 static inline int is_swap_pte(pte_t pte)
 {
 	return !pte_none(pte) && !pte_present(pte);
 }
 
+/*
+ * A swap-like special pte should only be used as special marker to trigger a
+ * page fault.  We should treat them similarly as pte_none() in most cases,
+ * except that it may contain some special information that can persist within
+ * the pte.  Currently the only special swap pte is UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL.
+ *
+ * Note: we should never call pte_to_swp_entry() upon a special swap pte,
+ * Because a swap special pte does not contain a swap entry!
+ */
+static inline bool is_swap_special_pte(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns true if the pte contains a swap entry.  This includes not only the
+ * normal swp entry case, but also for migration entries, etc.
+ */
+static inline bool pte_has_swap_entry(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return is_swap_pte(pte) && !is_swap_special_pte(pte);
+}
+
 /*
  * Convert the arch-dependent pte representation of a swp_entry_t into an
  * arch-independent swp_entry_t.
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index aa09535cf4d47..63a079e361a3d 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 */
 		if (likely(!(flags & FOLL_MIGRATION)))
 			goto no_page;
-		if (pte_none(pte))
+		if (!pte_has_swap_entry(pte))
 			goto no_page;
 		entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
 		if (!is_migration_entry(entry))
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 943cb2ba44423..4dba5debf1630 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_handle_pte(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
 	pte_t pte = *ptep;
 	uint64_t pfn_req_flags = *hmm_pfn;
 
-	if (pte_none(pte)) {
+	if (pte_none(pte) || is_swap_special_pte(pte)) {
 		required_fault =
 			hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, pfn_req_flags, 0);
 		if (required_fault)
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index ea74da3232ab6..e8b299aa32d06 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ static bool __collapse_huge_page_swapin(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 		vmf.pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
 		vmf.orig_pte = *vmf.pte;
-		if (!is_swap_pte(vmf.orig_pte)) {
+		if (!pte_has_swap_entry(vmf.orig_pte)) {
 			pte_unmap(vmf.pte);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -1246,6 +1246,15 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	     _pte++, _address += PAGE_SIZE) {
 		pte_t pteval = *_pte;
 		if (is_swap_pte(pteval)) {
+			if (is_swap_special_pte(pteval)) {
+				/*
+				 * Reuse SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP.  If there will be
+				 * new users of is_swap_special_pte(), we'd
+				 * better introduce a new result type.
+				 */
+				result = SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP;
+				goto out_unmap;
+			}
 			if (++unmapped <= khugepaged_max_ptes_swap) {
 				/*
 				 * Always be strict with uffd-wp
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 01fef79ac761b..c77499d21aac9 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int swapin_walk_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long start,
 		pte = *(orig_pte + ((index - start) / PAGE_SIZE));
 		pte_unmap_unlock(orig_pte, ptl);
 
-		if (pte_present(pte) || pte_none(pte))
+		if (!pte_has_swap_entry(pte))
 			continue;
 		entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
 		if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry)))
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
 	for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
 		ptent = *pte;
 
-		if (pte_none(ptent))
+		if (pte_none(ptent) || is_swap_special_pte(ptent))
 			continue;
 		/*
 		 * If the pte has swp_entry, just clear page table to
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3004afb6d0901..f3f21ce908dd2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5550,7 +5550,7 @@ static enum mc_target_type get_mctgt_type(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	if (pte_present(ptent))
 		page = mc_handle_present_pte(vma, addr, ptent);
-	else if (is_swap_pte(ptent))
+	else if (pte_has_swap_entry(ptent))
 		page = mc_handle_swap_pte(vma, ptent, &ent);
 	else if (pte_none(ptent))
 		page = mc_handle_file_pte(vma, addr, ptent, &ent);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 955a0bb6b855c..235857ccfaa11 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3323,6 +3323,13 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
 		goto out;
 
+	/*
+	 * We should never call do_swap_page upon a swap special pte; just be
+	 * safe to bail out if it happens.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(is_swap_special_pte(vmf->orig_pte)))
+		goto out;
+
 	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
 	if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
 		if (is_migration_entry(entry)) {
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 6b37d00890ca5..415961ed7a6cb 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void __migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep,
 
 	spin_lock(ptl);
 	pte = *ptep;
-	if (!is_swap_pte(pte))
+	if (!pte_has_swap_entry(pte))
 		goto out;
 
 	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
@@ -2381,7 +2381,7 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
 
 		pte = *ptep;
 
-		if (pte_none(pte)) {
+		if (pte_none(pte) || is_swap_special_pte(pte)) {
 			if (vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
 				mpfn = MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE;
 				migrate->cpages++;
diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
index 9122676b54d67..5728c3e6473f0 100644
--- a/mm/mincore.c
+++ b/mm/mincore.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 	for (; addr != end; ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
 		pte_t pte = *ptep;
 
-		if (pte_none(pte))
+		if (pte_none(pte) || is_swap_special_pte(pte))
 			__mincore_unmapped_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE,
 						 vma, vec);
 		else if (pte_present(pte))
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 94188df1ee557..b3def0a102bf4 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 			}
 			ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, pte, oldpte, ptent);
 			pages++;
-		} else if (is_swap_pte(oldpte)) {
+		} else if (pte_has_swap_entry(oldpte)) {
 			swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(oldpte);
 			pte_t newpte;
 
diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
index d22629ff8f3c0..67d2b84671a5a 100644
--- a/mm/mremap.c
+++ b/mm/mremap.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static pte_t move_soft_dirty_pte(pte_t pte)
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
 	if (pte_present(pte))
 		pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(pte);
-	else if (is_swap_pte(pte))
+	else if (pte_has_swap_entry(pte))
 		pte = pte_swp_mksoft_dirty(pte);
 #endif
 	return pte;
diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
index 86e3a3688d592..6b51759d9203f 100644
--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
+++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
 			 * For more details on device private memory see HMM
 			 * (include/linux/hmm.h or mm/hmm.c).
 			 */
-			if (is_swap_pte(*pvmw->pte)) {
+			if (pte_has_swap_entry(*pvmw->pte)) {
 				swp_entry_t entry;
 
 				/* Handle un-addressable ZONE_DEVICE memory */
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static bool check_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
 
 	if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION) {
 		swp_entry_t entry;
-		if (!is_swap_pte(*pvmw->pte))
+		if (!pte_has_swap_entry(*pvmw->pte))
 			return false;
 		entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*pvmw->pte);
 
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static bool check_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
 			return false;
 
 		pfn = migration_entry_to_pfn(entry);
-	} else if (is_swap_pte(*pvmw->pte)) {
+	} else if (pte_has_swap_entry(*pvmw->pte)) {
 		swp_entry_t entry;
 
 		/* Handle un-addressable ZONE_DEVICE memory */
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 149e77454e3c5..8aa4be0746593 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1964,7 +1964,7 @@ static int unuse_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 	si = swap_info[type];
 	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
 	do {
-		if (!is_swap_pte(*pte))
+		if (!pte_has_swap_entry(*pte))
 			continue;
 
 		entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*pte);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 18:54   ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details Peter Xu
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

File-backed memories are prone to unmap/swap so the ptes are always unstable.
This could lead to userfaultfd-wp information got lost when unmapped or swapped
out on such types of memory, for example, shmem.  To keep such an information
persistent, we will start to use the newly introduced swap-like special ptes to
replace a null pte when those ptes were removed.

Prepare this by handling such a special pte first before it is applied.  Here
a new fault flag FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP is introduced.  When this flag is set, it
means the current fault is to resolve a page access (either read or write) to
the uffd-wp special pte.

The handling of this special pte page fault is similar to missing fault, but it
should happen after the pte missing logic since the special pte is designed to
be a swap-like pte.  Meanwhile it should be handled before do_swap_page() so
that the swap core logic won't be confused to see such an illegal swap pte.

This is a slow path of uffd-wp handling, because unmap of wr-protected shmem
ptes should be rare.  So far it should only trigger in two conditions:

  (1) When trying to punch holes in shmem_fallocate(), there will be a
      pre-unmap optimization before evicting the page.  That will create
      unmapped shmem ptes with wr-protected pages covered.

  (2) Swapping out of shmem pages

Because of this, the page fault handling is simplifed too by not sending the
wr-protect message in the 1st page fault, instead the page will be installed
read-only, so the message will be generated until the next do_wp_page() call.

Disable fault-around for such a special page fault, because the introduced new
flag (FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP) only applies to current pte rather than all the pages
around it.  Doing fault-around with the new flag could confuse all the rest of
pages when installing ptes from page cache when there's a cache hit.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 11 +++++
 mm/memory.c                   | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
index bc733512c6905..fefebe6e96560 100644
--- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
+++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
@@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static inline bool uffd_disable_huge_pmd_share(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return vma->vm_flags & (VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MINOR);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Don't do fault around for FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP because it means we want to
+ * recover a previously wr-protected pte.  This flag is a per-pte information,
+ * so it could confuse all the pages around the current page when faulted in.
+ * Similar reason for MINOR mode faults.
+ */
+static inline bool uffd_disable_fault_around(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	return vma->vm_flags & (VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MINOR);
+}
+
 static inline bool userfaultfd_missing(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
 	return vma->vm_flags & VM_UFFD_MISSING;
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 235857ccfaa11..02db41bad3340 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3786,6 +3786,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_set_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page)
 void do_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
+	bool uffd_wp = pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(vmf->orig_pte);
 	bool write = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 	bool prefault = vmf->address != addr;
 	pte_t entry;
@@ -3798,6 +3799,8 @@ void do_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page, unsigned long addr)
 
 	if (write)
 		entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
+	if (unlikely(uffd_wp))
+		entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte_wrprotect(entry));
 	/* copy-on-write page */
 	if (write && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
 		inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
@@ -3865,8 +3868,12 @@ vm_fault_t finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
 				      vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
 	ret = 0;
-	/* Re-check under ptl */
-	if (likely(pte_none(*vmf->pte)))
+
+	/*
+	 * Re-check under ptl.  Note: this will cover both none pte and
+	 * uffd-wp-special swap pte
+	 */
+	if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)))
 		do_set_pte(vmf, page, vmf->address);
 	else
 		ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
@@ -3970,9 +3977,21 @@ static vm_fault_t do_fault_around(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	return vmf->vma->vm_ops->map_pages(vmf, start_pgoff, end_pgoff);
 }
 
+/* Return true if we should do read fault-around, false otherwise */
+static inline bool should_fault_around(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	/* No ->map_pages?  No way to fault around... */
+	if (!vmf->vma->vm_ops->map_pages)
+		return false;
+
+	if (uffd_disable_fault_around(vmf->vma))
+		return false;
+
+	return fault_around_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT > 1;
+}
+
 static vm_fault_t do_read_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -3980,7 +3999,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_read_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	 * if page by the offset is not ready to be mapped (cold cache or
 	 * something).
 	 */
-	if (vma->vm_ops->map_pages && fault_around_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT > 1) {
+	if (should_fault_around(vmf)) {
 		ret = do_fault_around(vmf);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -4293,6 +4312,57 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_huge_pud(struct vm_fault *vmf, pud_t orig_pud)
 	return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
 }
 
+static vm_fault_t uffd_wp_clear_special(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
+				       vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
+	/*
+	 * Be careful so that we will only recover a special uffd-wp pte into a
+	 * none pte.  Otherwise it means the pte could have changed, so retry.
+	 */
+	if (pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(*vmf->pte))
+		pte_clear(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
+	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This is actually a page-missing access, but with uffd-wp special pte
+ * installed.  It means this pte was wr-protected before being unmapped.
+ */
+static vm_fault_t uffd_wp_handle_special(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	/* Careful!  vmf->pte unmapped after return */
+	if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Just in case there're leftover special ptes even after the region
+	 * got unregistered - we can simply clear them.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(!userfaultfd_wp(vmf->vma) || vma_is_anonymous(vmf->vma)))
+		return uffd_wp_clear_special(vmf);
+
+	/*
+	 * Here we share most code with do_fault(), in which we can identify
+	 * whether this is "none pte fault" or "uffd-wp-special fault" by
+	 * checking the vmf->orig_pte.
+	 */
+	return do_fault(vmf);
+}
+
+static vm_fault_t do_swap_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	/*
+	 * We need to handle special swap ptes before handling ptes that
+	 * contain swap entries, always.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(vmf->orig_pte)))
+		return uffd_wp_handle_special(vmf);
+
+	return do_swap_page(vmf);
+}
+
 /*
  * These routines also need to handle stuff like marking pages dirty
  * and/or accessed for architectures that don't do it in hardware (most
@@ -4367,7 +4437,7 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	}
 
 	if (!pte_present(vmf->orig_pte))
-		return do_swap_page(vmf);
+		return do_swap_pte(vmf);
 
 	if (pte_protnone(vmf->orig_pte) && vma_is_accessible(vmf->vma))
 		return do_numa_page(vmf);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 06/24] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags Peter Xu
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

The first_index/last_index parameters in zap_details are actually only used in
unmap_mapping_range_tree().  At the meantime, this function is only called by
unmap_mapping_pages() once.  Instead of passing these two variables through the
whole stack of page zapping code, remove them from zap_details and let them
simply be parameters of unmap_mapping_range_tree(), which is inlined.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  2 --
 mm/memory.c        | 20 ++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 84fb1697b20ff..9060b497f4d5c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1707,8 +1707,6 @@ extern void user_shm_unlock(size_t, struct user_struct *);
  */
 struct zap_details {
 	struct address_space *check_mapping;	/* Check page->mapping if set */
-	pgoff_t	first_index;			/* Lowest page->index to unmap */
-	pgoff_t last_index;			/* Highest page->index to unmap */
 };
 
 struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 02db41bad3340..bcbce803e6850 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3213,20 +3213,20 @@ static void unmap_mapping_range_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 }
 
 static inline void unmap_mapping_range_tree(struct rb_root_cached *root,
+					    pgoff_t first_index,
+					    pgoff_t last_index,
 					    struct zap_details *details)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 	pgoff_t vba, vea, zba, zea;
 
-	vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, root,
-			details->first_index, details->last_index) {
-
+	vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, root, first_index, last_index) {
 		vba = vma->vm_pgoff;
 		vea = vba + vma_pages(vma) - 1;
-		zba = details->first_index;
+		zba = first_index;
 		if (zba < vba)
 			zba = vba;
-		zea = details->last_index;
+		zea = last_index;
 		if (zea > vea)
 			zea = vea;
 
@@ -3252,17 +3252,17 @@ static inline void unmap_mapping_range_tree(struct rb_root_cached *root,
 void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
 		pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows)
 {
+	pgoff_t	first_index = start, last_index = start + nr - 1;
 	struct zap_details details = { };
 
 	details.check_mapping = even_cows ? NULL : mapping;
-	details.first_index = start;
-	details.last_index = start + nr - 1;
-	if (details.last_index < details.first_index)
-		details.last_index = ULONG_MAX;
+	if (last_index < first_index)
+		last_index = ULONG_MAX;
 
 	i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
 	if (unlikely(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root)))
-		unmap_mapping_range_tree(&mapping->i_mmap, &details);
+		unmap_mapping_range_tree(&mapping->i_mmap, first_index,
+					 last_index, &details);
 	i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
 }
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 07/24] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP Peter Xu
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Instead of trying to introduce one variable for every new zap_details fields,
let's introduce a flag so that it can start to encode true/false informations.

Let's start to use this flag first to clean up the only check_mapping variable.
Firstly, the name "check_mapping" implies this is a "boolean", but actually it
stores the mapping inside, just in a way that it won't be set if we don't want
to check the mapping.

To make things clearer, introduce the 1st zap flag ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING, so
that we only check against the mapping if this bit set.  At the same time, we
can rename check_mapping into zap_mapping and set it always.

Since at it, introduce another helper zap_check_mapping_skip() and use it in
zap_pte_range() properly.

Some old comments have been removed in zap_pte_range() because they're
duplicated, and since now we're with ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING flag, it'll be very
easy to grep this information by simply grepping the flag.

It'll also make life easier when we want to e.g. pass in zap_flags into the
callers like unmap_mapping_pages() (instead of adding new booleans besides the
even_cows parameter).

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 mm/memory.c        | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 9060b497f4d5c..39c944bf7ed3a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1702,13 +1702,30 @@ static inline bool can_do_mlock(void) { return false; }
 extern int user_shm_lock(size_t, struct user_struct *);
 extern void user_shm_unlock(size_t, struct user_struct *);
 
+/* Whether to check page->mapping when zapping */
+#define  ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING             BIT(0)
+
 /*
  * Parameter block passed down to zap_pte_range in exceptional cases.
  */
 struct zap_details {
-	struct address_space *check_mapping;	/* Check page->mapping if set */
+	struct address_space *zap_mapping;
+	unsigned long zap_flags;
 };
 
+/* Return true if skip zapping this page, false otherwise */
+static inline bool
+zap_check_mapping_skip(struct zap_details *details, struct page *page)
+{
+	if (!details || !page)
+		return false;
+
+	if (!(details->zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING))
+		return false;
+
+	return details->zap_mapping != page_rmapping(page);
+}
+
 struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 			     pte_t pte);
 struct page *vm_normal_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index bcbce803e6850..94954436544f7 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1242,16 +1242,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			struct page *page;
 
 			page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
-			if (unlikely(details) && page) {
-				/*
-				 * unmap_shared_mapping_pages() wants to
-				 * invalidate cache without truncating:
-				 * unmap shared but keep private pages.
-				 */
-				if (details->check_mapping &&
-				    details->check_mapping != page_rmapping(page))
-					continue;
-			}
+			if (unlikely(zap_check_mapping_skip(details, page)))
+				continue;
 			ptent = ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte,
 							tlb->fullmm);
 			tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
@@ -1283,17 +1275,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 		if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
 			struct page *page = device_private_entry_to_page(entry);
 
-			if (unlikely(details && details->check_mapping)) {
-				/*
-				 * unmap_shared_mapping_pages() wants to
-				 * invalidate cache without truncating:
-				 * unmap shared but keep private pages.
-				 */
-				if (details->check_mapping !=
-				    page_rmapping(page))
-					continue;
-			}
-
+			if (unlikely(zap_check_mapping_skip(details, page)))
+				continue;
 			pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
 			rss[mm_counter(page)]--;
 			page_remove_rmap(page, false);
@@ -3253,9 +3236,11 @@ void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
 		pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows)
 {
 	pgoff_t	first_index = start, last_index = start + nr - 1;
-	struct zap_details details = { };
+	struct zap_details details = { .zap_mapping = mapping };
+
+	if (!even_cows)
+		details.zap_flags |= ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING;
 
-	details.check_mapping = even_cows ? NULL : mapping;
 	if (last_index < first_index)
 		last_index = ULONG_MAX;
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 08/24] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages() Peter Xu
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Firstly, the comment in zap_pte_range() is misleading because it checks against
details rather than check_mappings, so it's against what the code did.

Meanwhile, it's confusing too on not explaining why passing in the details
pointer would mean to skip all swap entries.  New user of zap_details could
very possibly miss this fact if they don't read deep until zap_pte_range()
because there's no comment at zap_details talking about it at all, so swap
entries could be errornously skipped without being noticed.

This partly reverts 3e8715fdc03e ("mm: drop zap_details::check_swap_entries"),
but introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP flag, which means the opposite of previous
"details" parameter: the caller should explicitly set this to skip swap
entries, otherwise swap entries will always be considered (which is still the
major case here).

Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 mm/memory.c        |  8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 39c944bf7ed3a..2227e9107e53e 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1704,6 +1704,8 @@ extern void user_shm_unlock(size_t, struct user_struct *);
 
 /* Whether to check page->mapping when zapping */
 #define  ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING             BIT(0)
+/* Whether to skip zapping swap entries */
+#define  ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP                 BIT(1)
 
 /*
  * Parameter block passed down to zap_pte_range in exceptional cases.
@@ -1726,6 +1728,16 @@ zap_check_mapping_skip(struct zap_details *details, struct page *page)
 	return details->zap_mapping != page_rmapping(page);
 }
 
+/* Return true if skip swap entries, false otherwise */
+static inline bool
+zap_skip_swap(struct zap_details *details)
+{
+	if (!details)
+		return false;
+
+	return details->zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP;
+}
+
 struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 			     pte_t pte);
 struct page *vm_normal_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 94954436544f7..5325c1c2cbd78 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1284,8 +1284,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		/* If details->check_mapping, we leave swap entries. */
-		if (unlikely(details))
+		if (unlikely(zap_skip_swap(details)))
 			continue;
 
 		if (!non_swap_entry(entry))
@@ -3236,7 +3235,10 @@ void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
 		pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows)
 {
 	pgoff_t	first_index = start, last_index = start + nr - 1;
-	struct zap_details details = { .zap_mapping = mapping };
+	struct zap_details details = {
+		.zap_mapping = mapping,
+		.zap_flags = ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP,
+	};
 
 	if (!even_cows)
 		details.zap_flags |= ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 09/24] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages()
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed Peter Xu
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Give unmap_mapping_pages() more power by allowing to specify a zap flag so that
it can pass in more information than "whether we'd also like to zap cow pages".
With the new flag, we can remove the even_cow parameter because even_cow==false
equals to zap_flags==ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING, while even_cow==true means a none
zap flag to pass in (though in most cases we have had even_cow==false).

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dax.c           | 10 ++++++----
 include/linux/mm.h |  4 ++--
 mm/khugepaged.c    |  3 ++-
 mm/memory.c        | 15 ++++++++-------
 mm/truncate.c      | 11 +++++++----
 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 69216241392f2..20ca8d7d36ebb 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static void *grab_mapping_entry(struct xa_state *xas,
 			xas_unlock_irq(xas);
 			unmap_mapping_pages(mapping,
 					xas->xa_index & ~PG_PMD_COLOUR,
-					PG_PMD_NR, false);
+					PG_PMD_NR, ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 			xas_reset(xas);
 			xas_lock_irq(xas);
 		}
@@ -612,7 +612,8 @@ struct page *dax_layout_busy_page_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 	 * guaranteed to either see new references or prevent new
 	 * references from being established.
 	 */
-	unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, start_idx, end_idx - start_idx + 1, 0);
+	unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, start_idx, end_idx - start_idx + 1,
+			    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 
 	xas_lock_irq(&xas);
 	xas_for_each(&xas, entry, end_idx) {
@@ -743,9 +744,10 @@ static void *dax_insert_entry(struct xa_state *xas,
 		/* we are replacing a zero page with block mapping */
 		if (dax_is_pmd_entry(entry))
 			unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index & ~PG_PMD_COLOUR,
-					PG_PMD_NR, false);
+					PG_PMD_NR, ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 		else /* pte entry */
-			unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index, 1, false);
+			unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index, 1,
+					    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 	}
 
 	xas_reset(xas);
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 2227e9107e53e..b8aa81a064a55 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1784,7 +1784,7 @@ extern int fixup_user_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			    unsigned long address, unsigned int fault_flags,
 			    bool *unlocked);
 void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
-		pgoff_t start, pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows);
+		pgoff_t start, pgoff_t nr, unsigned long zap_flags);
 void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 		loff_t const holebegin, loff_t const holelen, int even_cows);
 #else
@@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ static inline int fixup_user_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	return -EFAULT;
 }
 static inline void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
-		pgoff_t start, pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows) { }
+		pgoff_t start, pgoff_t nr, unsigned long zap_flags) { }
 static inline void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 		loff_t const holebegin, loff_t const holelen, int even_cows) { }
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index e8b299aa32d06..64a36cd375359 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1831,7 +1831,8 @@ static void collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		}
 
 		if (page_mapped(page))
-			unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index, 1, false);
+			unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index, 1,
+					    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 
 		xas_lock_irq(&xas);
 		xas_set(&xas, index);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 5325c1c2cbd78..189f60853a51d 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3224,7 +3224,10 @@ static inline void unmap_mapping_range_tree(struct rb_root_cached *root,
  * @mapping: The address space containing pages to be unmapped.
  * @start: Index of first page to be unmapped.
  * @nr: Number of pages to be unmapped.  0 to unmap to end of file.
- * @even_cows: Whether to unmap even private COWed pages.
+ * @zap_flags: Zap flags for the process.  E.g., when ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING is
+ *   passed into it, we will only zap the pages that are in the same mapping
+ *   specified in the @mapping parameter; otherwise we will not check mapping,
+ *   IOW cow pages will be zapped too.
  *
  * Unmap the pages in this address space from any userspace process which
  * has them mmaped.  Generally, you want to remove COWed pages as well when
@@ -3232,17 +3235,14 @@ static inline void unmap_mapping_range_tree(struct rb_root_cached *root,
  * cache.
  */
 void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
-		pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows)
+		pgoff_t nr, unsigned long zap_flags)
 {
 	pgoff_t	first_index = start, last_index = start + nr - 1;
 	struct zap_details details = {
 		.zap_mapping = mapping,
-		.zap_flags = ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP,
+		.zap_flags = zap_flags | ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP,
 	};
 
-	if (!even_cows)
-		details.zap_flags |= ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING;
-
 	if (last_index < first_index)
 		last_index = ULONG_MAX;
 
@@ -3284,7 +3284,8 @@ void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 			hlen = ULONG_MAX - hba + 1;
 	}
 
-	unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, hba, hlen, even_cows);
+	unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, hba, hlen, even_cows ?
+			    0 : ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unmap_mapping_range);
 
diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
index 95af244b112a0..ba2cbe300e83e 100644
--- a/mm/truncate.c
+++ b/mm/truncate.c
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ truncate_cleanup_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
 {
 	if (page_mapped(page)) {
 		unsigned int nr = thp_nr_pages(page);
-		unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, page->index, nr, false);
+		unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, page->index, nr,
+				    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 	}
 
 	if (page_has_private(page))
@@ -652,14 +653,15 @@ int invalidate_inode_pages2_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 					 * Zap the rest of the file in one hit.
 					 */
 					unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index,
-						(1 + end - index), false);
+							    (1 + end - index),
+							    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 					did_range_unmap = 1;
 				} else {
 					/*
 					 * Just zap this page
 					 */
 					unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index,
-								1, false);
+							    1, ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 				}
 			}
 			BUG_ON(page_mapped(page));
@@ -685,7 +687,8 @@ int invalidate_inode_pages2_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 	 * get remapped later.
 	 */
 	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
-		unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, start, end - start + 1, false);
+		unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, start, end - start + 1,
+				    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
 	}
 out:
 	cleancache_invalidate_inode(mapping);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 10/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages() Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

File-backed memory is prone to being unmapped at any time.  It means all
information in the pte will be dropped, including the uffd-wp flag.

Since the uffd-wp info cannot be stored in page cache or swap cache, persist
this wr-protect information by installing the special uffd-wp marker pte when
we're going to unmap a uffd wr-protected pte.  When the pte is accessed again,
we will know it's previously wr-protected by recognizing the special pte.

Meanwhile add a new flag ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP when we don't want to
persist such an information.  For example, when destroying the whole vma, or
punching a hole in a shmem file.  For the latter, we can only drop the uffd-wp
bit when holding the page lock.  It means the unmap_mapping_range() in
shmem_fallocate() still reuqires to zap without ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP
because that's still racy with the page faults.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h        | 11 ++++++++++
 include/linux/mm_inline.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/memory.c               | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 mm/rmap.c                 |  8 ++++++++
 mm/truncate.c             |  8 +++++++-
 5 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index b8aa81a064a55..d6790ab0cf575 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1706,6 +1706,8 @@ extern void user_shm_unlock(size_t, struct user_struct *);
 #define  ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING             BIT(0)
 /* Whether to skip zapping swap entries */
 #define  ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP                 BIT(1)
+/* Whether to completely drop uffd-wp entries for file-backed memory */
+#define  ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP         BIT(2)
 
 /*
  * Parameter block passed down to zap_pte_range in exceptional cases.
@@ -1738,6 +1740,15 @@ zap_skip_swap(struct zap_details *details)
 	return details->zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP;
 }
 
+static inline bool
+zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(struct zap_details *details)
+{
+	if (!details)
+		return false;
+
+	return details->zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP;
+}
+
 struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 			     pte_t pte);
 struct page *vm_normal_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_inline.h b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
index 355ea1ee32bd7..c29a6ef3a642a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/huge_mm.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
+#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
+#include <linux/swapops.h>
 
 /**
  * page_is_file_lru - should the page be on a file LRU or anon LRU?
@@ -104,4 +106,45 @@ static __always_inline void del_page_from_lru_list(struct page *page,
 	update_lru_size(lruvec, page_lru(page), page_zonenum(page),
 			-thp_nr_pages(page));
 }
+
+/*
+ * If this pte is wr-protected by uffd-wp in any form, arm the special pte to
+ * replace a none pte.  NOTE!  This should only be called when *pte is already
+ * cleared so we will never accidentally replace something valuable.  Meanwhile
+ * none pte also means we are not demoting the pte so if tlb flushed then we
+ * don't need to do it again; otherwise if tlb flush is postponed then it's
+ * even better.
+ *
+ * Must be called with pgtable lock held.
+ */
+static inline void
+pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+			      pte_t *pte, pte_t pteval)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD
+	bool arm_uffd_pte = false;
+
+	/* The current status of the pte should be "cleared" before calling */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_none(*pte));
+
+	if (vma_is_anonymous(vma))
+		return;
+
+	/* A uffd-wp wr-protected normal pte */
+	if (unlikely(pte_present(pteval) && pte_uffd_wp(pteval)))
+		arm_uffd_pte = true;
+
+	/*
+	 * A uffd-wp wr-protected swap pte.  Note: this should even work for
+	 * pte_swp_uffd_wp_special() too.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(is_swap_pte(pteval) && pte_swp_uffd_wp(pteval)))
+		arm_uffd_pte = true;
+
+	if (unlikely(arm_uffd_pte))
+		set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte,
+			   pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(vma));
+#endif
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 189f60853a51d..872fb59192277 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
 
 #include <trace/events/kmem.h>
 
@@ -1210,6 +1211,21 @@ copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This function makes sure that we'll replace the none pte with an uffd-wp
+ * swap special pte marker when necessary. Must be with the pgtable lock held.
+ */
+static inline void
+zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+			      unsigned long addr, pte_t *pte,
+			      struct zap_details *details, pte_t pteval)
+{
+	if (zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(details))
+		return;
+
+	pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, pteval);
+}
+
 static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 				unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
@@ -1247,6 +1263,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			ptent = ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte,
 							tlb->fullmm);
 			tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
+			zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, details,
+						      ptent);
 			if (unlikely(!page))
 				continue;
 
@@ -1271,6 +1289,22 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * If this is a special uffd-wp marker pte... Drop it only if
+		 * enforced to do so.
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(is_swap_special_pte(ptent))) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(ptent));
+			/*
+			 * If this is a common unmap of ptes, keep this as is.
+			 * Drop it only if this is a whole-vma destruction.
+			 */
+			if (zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(details))
+				ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte,
+							tlb->fullmm);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		entry = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
 		if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
 			struct page *page = device_private_entry_to_page(entry);
@@ -1281,6 +1315,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			rss[mm_counter(page)]--;
 			page_remove_rmap(page, false);
 			put_page(page);
+			zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, details,
+						      ptent);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1298,6 +1334,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 		if (unlikely(!free_swap_and_cache(entry)))
 			print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
 		pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
+		zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, details, ptent);
 	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
 
 	add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss);
@@ -1497,12 +1534,15 @@ void unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 		unsigned long end_addr)
 {
 	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
+	struct zap_details details = {
+		.zap_flags = ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP,
+	};
 
 	mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_UNMAP, 0, vma, vma->vm_mm,
 				start_addr, end_addr);
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
 	for ( ; vma && vma->vm_start < end_addr; vma = vma->vm_next)
-		unmap_single_vma(tlb, vma, start_addr, end_addr, NULL);
+		unmap_single_vma(tlb, vma, start_addr, end_addr, &details);
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index b0fc27e77d6d7..5e25c57164fcf 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
 #include <linux/page_idle.h>
 #include <linux/memremap.h>
 #include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
+#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 
@@ -1571,6 +1572,13 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * Now the pte is cleared.  If this is uffd-wp armed pte, we
+		 * may want to replace a none pte with a marker pte if it's
+		 * file-backed, so we don't lose the tracking information.
+		 */
+		pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
+
 		/* Move the dirty bit to the page. Now the pte is gone. */
 		if (pte_dirty(pteval))
 			set_page_dirty(page);
diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
index ba2cbe300e83e..65fed21e52bd0 100644
--- a/mm/truncate.c
+++ b/mm/truncate.c
@@ -173,7 +173,13 @@ truncate_cleanup_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
 	if (page_mapped(page)) {
 		unsigned int nr = thp_nr_pages(page);
 		unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, page->index, nr,
-				    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
+				    ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING |
+				    /*
+				     * Now it's safe to drop uffd-wp because
+				     * we're with page lock, and the page is
+				     * being truncated.
+				     */
+				    ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP);
 	}
 
 	if (page_has_private(page))
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 11/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

File-backed memory differs from anonymous memory in that even if the pte is
missing, the data could still resides either in the file or in page/swap cache.
So when wr-protect a pte, we need to consider none ptes too.

We do that by installing the uffd-wp special swap pte as a marker.  So when
there's a future write to the pte, the fault handler will go the special path
to first fault-in the page as read-only, then report to userfaultfd server with
the wr-protect message.

On the other hand, when unprotecting a page, it's also possible that the pte
got unmapped but replaced by the special uffd-wp marker.  Then we'll need to be
able to recover from a uffd-wp special swap pte into a none pte, so that the
next access to the page will fault in correctly as usual when trigger the fault
handler next time, rather than sending a uffd-wp message.

Special care needs to be taken throughout the change_protection_range()
process.  Since now we allow user to wr-protect a none pte, we need to be able
to pre-populate the page table entries if we see !anonymous && MM_CP_UFFD_WP
requests, otherwise change_protection_range() will always skip when the pgtable
entry does not exist.

Note that this patch only covers the small pages (pte level) but not covering
any of the transparent huge pages yet.  But this will be a base for thps too.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/mprotect.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index b3def0a102bf4..6b63e3544b470 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
 #include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -176,6 +177,32 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 				set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, newpte);
 				pages++;
 			}
+		} else if (unlikely(is_swap_special_pte(oldpte))) {
+			if (uffd_wp_resolve && !vma_is_anonymous(vma) &&
+			    pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(oldpte)) {
+				/*
+				 * This is uffd-wp special pte and we'd like to
+				 * unprotect it.  What we need to do is simply
+				 * recover the pte into a none pte; the next
+				 * page fault will fault in the page.
+				 */
+				pte_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte);
+				pages++;
+			}
+		} else {
+			/* It must be an none page, or what else?.. */
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_none(oldpte));
+			if (unlikely(uffd_wp && !vma_is_anonymous(vma))) {
+				/*
+				 * For file-backed mem, we need to be able to
+				 * wr-protect even for a none pte!  Because
+				 * even if the pte is null, the page/swap cache
+				 * could exist.
+				 */
+				set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte,
+					   pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(vma));
+				pages++;
+			}
 		}
 	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
 	arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
@@ -209,6 +236,25 @@ static inline int pmd_none_or_clear_bad_unless_trans_huge(pmd_t *pmd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * File-backed vma allows uffd wr-protect upon none ptes, because even if pte
+ * is missing, page/swap cache could exist.  When that happens, the wr-protect
+ * information will be stored in the page table entries with the marker (e.g.,
+ * PTE_SWP_UFFD_WP_SPECIAL).  Prepare for that by always populating the page
+ * tables to pte level, so that we'll install the markers in change_pte_range()
+ * where necessary.
+ *
+ * Note that we only need to do this in pmd level, because if pmd does not
+ * exist, it means the whole range covered by the pmd entry (of a pud) does not
+ * contain any valid data but all zeros.  Then nothing to wr-protect.
+ */
+#define  change_protection_prepare(vma, pmd, addr, cp_flags)		\
+	do {								\
+		if (unlikely((cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP) && pmd_none(*pmd) && \
+			     !vma_is_anonymous(vma)))			\
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_alloc(vma->vm_mm, pmd));	\
+	} while (0)
+
 static inline unsigned long change_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 		pgprot_t newprot, unsigned long cp_flags)
@@ -227,6 +273,8 @@ static inline unsigned long change_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 		next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
 
+		change_protection_prepare(vma, pmd, addr, cp_flags);
+
 		/*
 		 * Automatic NUMA balancing walks the tables with mmap_lock
 		 * held for read. It's possible a parallel update to occur
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 12/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes Peter Xu
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

We don't have "huge" version of PTE_SWP_UFFD_WP_SPECIAL, instead when necessary
we split the thp if the huge page is uffd wr-protected previously.

However split the thp is not enough, because file-backed thp is handled totally
differently comparing to anonymous thps - rather than doing a real split, the
thp pmd will simply got dropped in __split_huge_pmd_locked().

That is definitely not enough if e.g. when there is a thp covers range [0, 2M)
but we want to wr-protect small page resides in [4K, 8K) range, because after
__split_huge_pmd() returns, there will be a none pmd.

Here we leverage the previously introduced change_protection_prepare() macro so
that we'll populate the pmd with a pgtable page.  Then change_pte_range() will
do all the rest for us, e.g., install the uffd-wp swap special pte marker at
any pte that we'd like to wr-protect, under the protection of pgtable lock.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/mprotect.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 6b63e3544b470..51c954afa4069 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -296,8 +296,16 @@ static inline unsigned long change_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		}
 
 		if (is_swap_pmd(*pmd) || pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd)) {
-			if (next - addr != HPAGE_PMD_SIZE) {
+			if (next - addr != HPAGE_PMD_SIZE ||
+			    /* Uffd wr-protecting a file-backed memory range */
+			    unlikely(!vma_is_anonymous(vma) &&
+				     (cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP))) {
 				__split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr, false, NULL);
+				/*
+				 * For file-backed, the pmd could have been
+				 * gone; still provide a pte pgtable if needed.
+				 */
+				change_protection_prepare(vma, pmd, addr, cp_flags);
 			} else {
 				int nr_ptes = change_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr,
 							      newprot, cp_flags);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 13/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork() Peter Xu
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Note that the special uffd-wp swap pte can be left over even if the page under
the pte got evicted.  Normally when evict a page, we will unmap the ptes by
walking through the reverse mapping.  However we never tracked such information
for the special swap ptes because they're not real mappings but just markers.
So we need to take care of that when we see a marker but when it's actually
meaningless (the page behind it got evicted).

We have already taken care of that in e.g. alloc_set_pte() where we'll treat
the special swap pte as pte_none() when necessary.  However we need to also
teach userfaultfd itself on either UFFDIO_COPY or handling page faults, so that
everything will still work as expected.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 fs/userfaultfd.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 mm/shmem.c       | 13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 5dd78238cc156..b34486a88b5f3 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -329,6 +329,21 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_must_wait(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 	 */
 	if (pte_none(*pte))
 		ret = true;
+	/*
+	 * We also treat the swap special uffd-wp pte as the pte_none() here.
+	 * This should in most cases be a missing event, as we never handle
+	 * wr-protect upon a special uffd-wp swap pte - it should first be
+	 * converted into a normal read request before handling wp.  It just
+	 * means the page/swap cache that backing this pte is gone, so this
+	 * special pte is leftover.
+	 *
+	 * We can't simply replace it with a none pte because we're not with
+	 * the pgtable lock here.  Instead of taking it and clearing the pte,
+	 * the easy way is to let UFFDIO_COPY understand this pte too when
+	 * trying to install a new page onto it.
+	 */
+	if (pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(*pte))
+		ret = true;
 	if (!pte_write(*pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
 		ret = true;
 	pte_unmap(pte);
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 8fbf7680f044c..a1f21736ad68e 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2453,7 +2453,18 @@ static int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 		goto out_release_unlock;
 
 	ret = -EEXIST;
-	if (!pte_none(*dst_pte))
+	/*
+	 * Besides the none pte, we also allow UFFDIO_COPY to install a pte
+	 * onto the uffd-wp swap special pte, because that pte should be the
+	 * same as a pte_none() just in that it contains wr-protect information
+	 * (which could only be dropped when unmap the memory).
+	 *
+	 * It's safe to drop that marker because we know this is part of a
+	 * MISSING fault, and the caller is very clear about this page missing
+	 * rather than wr-protected.  Then we're sure the wr-protect bit is
+	 * just a leftover so it's useless already.
+	 */
+	if (!pte_none(*dst_pte) && !pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(*dst_pte))
 		goto out_release_unlock;
 
 	lru_cache_add(page);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 14/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork()
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h Peter Xu
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

It should be handled similarly like other uffd-wp wr-protected ptes: we should
pass it over when the dst_vma has VM_UFFD_WP armed, otherwise drop it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 872fb59192277..f1cdc613b5887 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -715,8 +715,21 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
 	unsigned long vm_flags = dst_vma->vm_flags;
 	pte_t pte = *src_pte;
 	struct page *page;
-	swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
+	swp_entry_t entry;
+
+	if (unlikely(is_swap_special_pte(pte))) {
+		/*
+		 * uffd-wp special swap pte is the only possibility for now.
+		 * If dst vma is registered with uffd-wp, copy it over.
+		 * Otherwise, ignore this pte as if it's a none pte would work.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte));
+		if (userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma))
+			set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+		return 0;
+	}
 
+	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
 	if (likely(!non_swap_entry(entry))) {
 		if (swap_duplicate(entry) < 0)
 			return entry.val;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 15/24] mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork() Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Drop it in the header since it's only used in hugetlb.c.

Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/hugetlb.h | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index b92f25ccef588..eb134a75cad41 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -126,9 +126,6 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			  unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 			  struct page *ref_page);
-void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-				unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
-				struct page *ref_page);
 void hugetlb_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *);
 int hugetlb_report_node_meminfo(char *buf, int len, int nid);
 void hugetlb_show_meminfo(void);
@@ -362,13 +359,6 @@ static inline void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 	BUG();
 }
 
-static inline void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
-			struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
-			unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page)
-{
-	BUG();
-}
-
 static inline vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 			unsigned int flags)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-28  0:07   ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Hook up hugetlbfs_fault() with the capability to handle userfaultfd-wp faults.

We do this slightly earlier than hugetlb_cow() so that we can avoid taking some
extra locks that we definitely don't need.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 629aa4c2259c8..8e234ee9a15e2 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4802,6 +4802,25 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (unlikely(!pte_same(entry, huge_ptep_get(ptep))))
 		goto out_ptl;
 
+	/* Handle userfault-wp first, before trying to lock more pages */
+	if (userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, huge_ptep_get(ptep)) &&
+	    (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && !huge_pte_write(entry)) {
+		struct vm_fault vmf = {
+			.vma = vma,
+			.address = haddr,
+			.flags = flags,
+		};
+
+		spin_unlock(ptl);
+		if (pagecache_page) {
+			unlock_page(pagecache_page);
+			put_page(pagecache_page);
+		}
+		mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
+		i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
+		return handle_userfault(&vmf, VM_UFFD_WP);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * hugetlb_cow() requires page locks of pte_page(entry) and
 	 * pagecache_page, so here we need take the former one
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 17/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Firstly, pass the wp_copy variable into hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() thoughout
the stack.  Then, apply the UFFD_WP bit if UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP is with
UFFDIO_COPY.  Introduce huge_pte_mkuffd_wp() for it.

Hugetlb pages are only managed by hugetlbfs, so we're safe even without setting
dirty bit in the huge pte if the page is installed as read-only.  However we'd
better still keep the dirty bit set for a read-only UFFDIO_COPY pte (when
UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP bit is set), not only to match what we do with shmem, but
also because the page does contain dirty data that the kernel just copied from
the userspace.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h |  5 +++++
 include/linux/hugetlb.h       |  6 ++++--
 mm/hugetlb.c                  | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 mm/userfaultfd.c              | 12 ++++++++----
 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
index 8e1e6244a89da..548212eccbd61 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ static inline pte_t huge_pte_mkdirty(pte_t pte)
 	return pte_mkdirty(pte);
 }
 
+static inline pte_t huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return pte_mkuffd_wp(pte);
+}
+
 static inline pte_t huge_pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
 {
 	return pte_modify(pte, newprot);
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index eb134a75cad41..e38077918330f 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, pte_t *dst_pte,
 				unsigned long dst_addr,
 				unsigned long src_addr,
 				enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
-				struct page **pagep);
+				struct page **pagep,
+				bool wp_copy);
 #endif /* CONFIG_USERFAULTFD */
 bool hugetlb_reserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long from, long to,
 						struct vm_area_struct *vma,
@@ -318,7 +319,8 @@ static inline int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 						unsigned long dst_addr,
 						unsigned long src_addr,
 						enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
-						struct page **pagep)
+						struct page **pagep,
+						bool wp_copy)
 {
 	BUG();
 	return 0;
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 8e234ee9a15e2..20ee8fdf6507d 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4884,7 +4884,8 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 			    unsigned long dst_addr,
 			    unsigned long src_addr,
 			    enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
-			    struct page **pagep)
+			    struct page **pagep,
+			    bool wp_copy)
 {
 	bool is_continue = (mode == MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE);
 	struct address_space *mapping;
@@ -4981,17 +4982,28 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 		hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap(page, dst_vma, dst_addr);
 	}
 
-	/* For CONTINUE on a non-shared VMA, don't set VM_WRITE for CoW. */
-	if (is_continue && !vm_shared)
+	/*
+	 * For either: (1) CONTINUE on a non-shared VMA, or (2) UFFDIO_COPY
+	 * with wp flag set, don't set pte write bit.
+	 */
+	if (wp_copy || (is_continue && !vm_shared))
 		writable = 0;
 	else
 		writable = dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE;
 
 	_dst_pte = make_huge_pte(dst_vma, page, writable);
-	if (writable)
-		_dst_pte = huge_pte_mkdirty(_dst_pte);
+	/*
+	 * Always mark UFFDIO_COPY page dirty; note that this may not be
+	 * extremely important for hugetlbfs for now since swapping is not
+	 * supported, but we should still be clear in that this page cannot be
+	 * thrown away at will, even if write bit not set.
+	 */
+	_dst_pte = huge_pte_mkdirty(_dst_pte);
 	_dst_pte = pte_mkyoung(_dst_pte);
 
+	if (wp_copy)
+		_dst_pte = huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(_dst_pte);
+
 	set_huge_pte_at(dst_mm, dst_addr, dst_pte, _dst_pte);
 
 	(void)huge_ptep_set_access_flags(dst_vma, dst_addr, dst_pte, _dst_pte,
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 7adaebe222b8e..4f716838f1fdb 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 					      unsigned long dst_start,
 					      unsigned long src_start,
 					      unsigned long len,
-					      enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode)
+					      enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
+					      bool wp_copy)
 {
 	int vm_alloc_shared = dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED;
 	int vm_shared = dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED;
@@ -304,7 +305,8 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 		}
 
 		err = hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pte, dst_vma,
-					       dst_addr, src_addr, mode, &page);
+					       dst_addr, src_addr, mode, &page,
+					       wp_copy);
 
 		mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
 		i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
@@ -406,7 +408,8 @@ extern ssize_t __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 				      unsigned long dst_start,
 				      unsigned long src_start,
 				      unsigned long len,
-				      enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode);
+				      enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
+				      bool wp_copy);
 #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
 
 static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
@@ -526,7 +529,8 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t __mcopy_atomic(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 	 */
 	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(dst_vma))
 		return  __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(dst_mm, dst_vma, dst_start,
-						src_start, len, mcopy_mode);
+					       src_start, len, mcopy_mode,
+					       wp_copy);
 
 	if (!vma_is_anonymous(dst_vma) && !vma_is_shmem(dst_vma))
 		goto out_unlock;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 18/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers Peter Xu
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

This starts from passing cp_flags into hugetlb_change_protection() so hugetlb
will be able to handle MM_CP_UFFD_WP[_RESOLVE] requests.

huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp() is introduced to handle the case where the
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT is requested upon migrating huge page entries.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h |  5 +++++
 include/linux/hugetlb.h       |  6 ++++--
 mm/hugetlb.c                  | 13 ++++++++++++-
 mm/mprotect.c                 |  3 ++-
 mm/userfaultfd.c              |  8 ++++++++
 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
index 548212eccbd61..181cdc3297e7b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ static inline pte_t huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte)
 	return pte_mkuffd_wp(pte);
 }
 
+static inline pte_t huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
+}
+
 static inline pte_t huge_pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
 {
 	return pte_modify(pte, newprot);
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index e38077918330f..652660fd6ec8a 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ struct page *follow_huge_pgd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 int pmd_huge(pmd_t pmd);
 int pud_huge(pud_t pud);
 unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-		unsigned long address, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot);
+		unsigned long address, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot,
+		unsigned long cp_flags);
 
 bool is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte_t pte);
 void hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
@@ -349,7 +350,8 @@ static inline void move_hugetlb_state(struct page *oldpage,
 
 static inline unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(
 			struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
-			unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot)
+			unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot,
+			unsigned long cp_flags)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 20ee8fdf6507d..3cad5d7726614 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5222,7 +5222,8 @@ long follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 }
 
 unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-		unsigned long address, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot)
+		unsigned long address, unsigned long end,
+		pgprot_t newprot, unsigned long cp_flags)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	unsigned long start = address;
@@ -5232,6 +5233,8 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	unsigned long pages = 0;
 	bool shared_pmd = false;
 	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
+	bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
+	bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE;
 
 	/*
 	 * In the case of shared PMDs, the area to flush could be beyond
@@ -5272,6 +5275,10 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 				make_migration_entry_read(&entry);
 				newpte = swp_entry_to_pte(entry);
+				if (uffd_wp)
+					newpte = pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(newpte);
+				else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+					newpte = pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(newpte);
 				set_huge_swap_pte_at(mm, address, ptep,
 						     newpte, huge_page_size(h));
 				pages++;
@@ -5285,6 +5292,10 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, address, ptep);
 			pte = pte_mkhuge(huge_pte_modify(old_pte, newprot));
 			pte = arch_make_huge_pte(pte, vma, NULL, 0);
+			if (uffd_wp)
+				pte = huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(huge_pte_wrprotect(pte));
+			else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+				pte = huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
 			huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, address, ptep, old_pte, pte);
 			pages++;
 		}
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 51c954afa4069..fe5a5b96a61f9 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ unsigned long change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	BUG_ON((cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL) == MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL);
 
 	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
-		pages = hugetlb_change_protection(vma, start, end, newprot);
+		pages = hugetlb_change_protection(vma, start, end, newprot,
+						  cp_flags);
 	else
 		pages = change_protection_range(vma, start, end, newprot,
 						cp_flags);
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 4f716838f1fdb..ceb77ea24497e 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ int mwriteprotect_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, unsigned long start,
 			unsigned long len, bool enable_wp, bool *mmap_changing)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma;
+	unsigned long page_mask;
 	pgprot_t newprot;
 	int err;
 
@@ -689,6 +690,13 @@ int mwriteprotect_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, unsigned long start,
 	if (!vma_is_anonymous(dst_vma))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
+	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(dst_vma)) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		page_mask = vma_kernel_pagesize(dst_vma) - 1;
+		if ((start & page_mask) || (len & page_mask))
+			goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	if (enable_wp)
 		newprot = vm_get_page_prot(dst_vma->vm_flags & ~(VM_WRITE));
 	else
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 19/24] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler Peter Xu
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

This is to let hugetlbfs be prepared to also recognize swap special ptes just
like uffd-wp special swap ptes.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 3cad5d7726614..071a8429ea190 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -93,6 +93,26 @@ static inline bool subpool_is_free(struct hugepage_subpool *spool)
 	return true;
 }
 
+/*
+ * These are sister versions of is_swap_pte() and pte_has_swap_entry().  We
+ * need standalone ones because huge_pte_none() is handled differently from
+ * pte_none().  For more information, please refer to comments above
+ * is_swap_pte() and pte_has_swap_entry().
+ *
+ * Here we directly reuse the pte level of swap special ptes, for example, the
+ * pte_swp_uffd_wp_special().  It just stands for a huge page rather than a
+ * small page for hugetlbfs pages.
+ */
+static inline bool is_huge_swap_pte(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return !huge_pte_none(pte) && !pte_present(pte);
+}
+
+static inline bool huge_pte_has_swap_entry(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return is_huge_swap_pte(pte) && !is_swap_special_pte(pte);
+}
+
 static inline void unlock_or_release_subpool(struct hugepage_subpool *spool,
 						unsigned long irq_flags)
 {
@@ -3885,7 +3905,7 @@ bool is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte_t pte)
 {
 	swp_entry_t swp;
 
-	if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte))
+	if (!huge_pte_has_swap_entry(pte))
 		return false;
 	swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
 	if (is_migration_entry(swp))
@@ -3898,7 +3918,7 @@ static bool is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte_t pte)
 {
 	swp_entry_t swp;
 
-	if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte))
+	if (!huge_pte_has_swap_entry(pte))
 		return false;
 	swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
 	if (is_hwpoison_entry(swp))
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 20/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Teach the hugetlb page fault code to understand uffd-wp special pte.  For
example, when seeing such a pte we need to convert any write fault into a read
one (which is fake - we'll retry the write later if so).  Meanwhile, for
handle_userfault() we'll need to make sure we must wait for the special swap
pte too just like a none pte.

Note that we also need to teach UFFDIO_COPY about this special pte across the
code path so that we can safely install a new page at this special pte as long
as we know it's a stall entry.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 fs/userfaultfd.c |  5 ++++-
 mm/hugetlb.c     | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 mm/userfaultfd.c |  5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index b34486a88b5f3..a41e0631af512 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -245,8 +245,11 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_must_wait(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 	/*
 	 * Lockless access: we're in a wait_event so it's ok if it
 	 * changes under us.
+	 *
+	 * Regarding uffd-wp special case, please refer to comments in
+	 * userfaultfd_must_wait().
 	 */
-	if (huge_pte_none(pte))
+	if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte))
 		ret = true;
 	if (!huge_pte_write(pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
 		ret = true;
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 071a8429ea190..d9ff7db14175d 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4529,7 +4529,8 @@ static inline vm_fault_t hugetlb_handle_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t idx,
-			unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep, unsigned int flags)
+			unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep,
+			pte_t old_pte, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
 	vm_fault_t ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
@@ -4653,7 +4654,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep);
 	ret = 0;
-	if (!huge_pte_none(huge_ptep_get(ptep)))
+	if (!pte_same(huge_ptep_get(ptep), old_pte))
 		goto backout;
 
 	if (anon_rmap) {
@@ -4663,6 +4664,12 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		page_dup_rmap(page, true);
 	new_pte = make_huge_pte(vma, page, ((vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
 				&& (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)));
+	/*
+	 * If this pte was previously wr-protected, keep it wr-protected even
+	 * if populated.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(old_pte)))
+		new_pte = huge_pte_wrprotect(huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(new_pte));
 	set_huge_pte_at(mm, haddr, ptep, new_pte);
 
 	hugetlb_count_add(pages_per_huge_page(h), mm);
@@ -4778,8 +4785,13 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
 
 	entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
-	if (huge_pte_none(entry)) {
-		ret = hugetlb_no_page(mm, vma, mapping, idx, address, ptep, flags);
+	/*
+	 * uffd-wp-special should be handled merely the same as pte none
+	 * because it's basically a none pte with a special marker
+	 */
+	if (huge_pte_none(entry) || pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(entry)) {
+		ret = hugetlb_no_page(mm, vma, mapping, idx, address, ptep,
+				      entry, flags);
 		goto out_mutex;
 	}
 
@@ -4913,7 +4925,7 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 	unsigned long size;
 	int vm_shared = dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED;
 	struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(dst_vma);
-	pte_t _dst_pte;
+	pte_t _dst_pte, cur_pte;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	int ret;
 	struct page *page;
@@ -4991,8 +5003,10 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 	if (idx >= size)
 		goto out_release_unlock;
 
+	cur_pte = huge_ptep_get(dst_pte);
 	ret = -EEXIST;
-	if (!huge_pte_none(huge_ptep_get(dst_pte)))
+	/* Please refer to shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() for uffd-wp special case */
+	if (!huge_pte_none(cur_pte) && !pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(cur_pte))
 		goto out_release_unlock;
 
 	if (vm_shared) {
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index ceb77ea24497e..2cd6ad5c3d8f8 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 	}
 
 	while (src_addr < src_start + len) {
+		pte_t pteval;
+
 		BUG_ON(dst_addr >= dst_start + len);
 
 		/*
@@ -296,8 +298,9 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 
+		pteval = huge_ptep_get(dst_pte);
 		if (mode != MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE &&
-		    !huge_pte_none(huge_ptep_get(dst_pte))) {
+		    !huge_pte_none(pteval) && !pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pteval)) {
 			err = -EEXIST;
 			mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
 			i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 21/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Teach hugetlbfs code to wr-protect none ptes just in case the page cache
existed for that pte.  Meanwhile we also need to be able to recognize a uffd-wp
marker pte and remove it for uffd_wp_resolve.

Since at it, introduce a variable "psize" to replace all references to the huge
page size fetcher.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index d9ff7db14175d..fa9af9c893512 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5264,7 +5264,7 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	pte_t *ptep;
 	pte_t pte;
 	struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
-	unsigned long pages = 0;
+	unsigned long pages = 0, psize = huge_page_size(h);
 	bool shared_pmd = false;
 	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
 	bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
@@ -5284,13 +5284,19 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
 	i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
-	for (; address < end; address += huge_page_size(h)) {
+	for (; address < end; address += psize) {
 		spinlock_t *ptl;
-		ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, huge_page_size(h));
+		ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, psize);
 		if (!ptep)
 			continue;
 		ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep);
 		if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, vma, &address, ptep)) {
+			/*
+			 * When uffd-wp is enabled on the vma, unshare
+			 * shouldn't happen at all.  Warn about it if it
+			 * happened due to some reason.
+			 */
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(uffd_wp || uffd_wp_resolve);
 			pages++;
 			spin_unlock(ptl);
 			shared_pmd = true;
@@ -5314,12 +5320,21 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
 					newpte = pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(newpte);
 				set_huge_swap_pte_at(mm, address, ptep,
-						     newpte, huge_page_size(h));
+						     newpte, psize);
 				pages++;
 			}
 			spin_unlock(ptl);
 			continue;
 		}
+		if (unlikely(is_swap_special_pte(pte))) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte));
+			/*
+			 * This is changing a non-present pte into a none pte,
+			 * no need for huge_ptep_modify_prot_start/commit().
+			 */
+			if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+				huge_pte_clear(mm, address, ptep, psize);
+		}
 		if (!huge_pte_none(pte)) {
 			pte_t old_pte;
 
@@ -5332,6 +5347,12 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				pte = huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
 			huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, address, ptep, old_pte, pte);
 			pages++;
+		} else {
+			/* None pte */
+			if (unlikely(uffd_wp))
+				/* Safe to modify directly (none->non-present). */
+				set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep,
+						pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(vma));
 		}
 		spin_unlock(ptl);
 	}
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 22/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

As with shmem uffd-wp special ptes, only drop the uffd-wp special swap pte if
unmapping an entire vma or synchronized such that faults can not race with the
unmap operation.  This requires passing zap_flags all the way to the lowest
level hugetlb unmap routine: __unmap_hugepage_range.

In general, unmap calls originated in hugetlbfs code will pass the
ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP flag as synchronization is in place to prevent
faults.  The exception is hole punch which will first unmap without any
synchronization.  Later when hole punch actually removes the page from the
file, it will check to see if there was a subsequent fault and if so take the
hugetlb fault mutex while unmapping again.  This second unmap will pass in
ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP.

The core justification of "whether to apply ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP flag
when unmap a hugetlb range" is (IMHO): we should never reach a state when a
page fault could errornously fault in a page-cache page that was wr-protected
to be writable, even in an extremely short period.  That could happen if
e.g. we pass ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP in hugetlbfs_punch_hole() when calling
hugetlb_vmdelete_list(), because if a page fault triggers after that call and
before the remove_inode_hugepages() right after it, the page cache can be
mapped writable again in the small window, which can cause data corruption.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c    | 15 +++++++++------
 include/linux/hugetlb.h |  8 +++++---
 mm/hugetlb.c            | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 mm/memory.c             |  5 ++++-
 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
index a2a42335e8fd2..9b383c39756a5 100644
--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -399,7 +399,8 @@ static void remove_huge_page(struct page *page)
 }
 
 static void
-hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
+hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end,
+		      unsigned long zap_flags)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
@@ -432,7 +433,7 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
 		}
 
 		unmap_hugepage_range(vma, vma->vm_start + v_offset, v_end,
-									NULL);
+				     NULL, zap_flags);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -510,7 +511,8 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
 				mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
 				hugetlb_vmdelete_list(&mapping->i_mmap,
 					index * pages_per_huge_page(h),
-					(index + 1) * pages_per_huge_page(h));
+					(index + 1) * pages_per_huge_page(h),
+					ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP);
 				i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
 			}
 
@@ -576,7 +578,8 @@ static void hugetlb_vmtruncate(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
 	i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
 	i_size_write(inode, offset);
 	if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root))
-		hugetlb_vmdelete_list(&mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, 0);
+		hugetlb_vmdelete_list(&mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, 0,
+				      ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP);
 	i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
 	remove_inode_hugepages(inode, offset, LLONG_MAX);
 }
@@ -609,8 +612,8 @@ static long hugetlbfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
 		i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
 		if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root))
 			hugetlb_vmdelete_list(&mapping->i_mmap,
-						hole_start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
-						hole_end  >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+					      hole_start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+					      hole_end >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
 		i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
 		remove_inode_hugepages(inode, hole_start, hole_end);
 		inode_unlock(inode);
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index 652660fd6ec8a..5fa84bbefa628 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -121,11 +121,12 @@ long follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *, struct vm_area_struct *,
 			 unsigned long *, unsigned long *, long, unsigned int,
 			 int *);
 void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *,
-			  unsigned long, unsigned long, struct page *);
+			  unsigned long, unsigned long, struct page *,
+			  unsigned long);
 void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			  unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
-			  struct page *ref_page);
+			  struct page *ref_page, unsigned long zap_flags);
 void hugetlb_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *);
 int hugetlb_report_node_meminfo(char *buf, int len, int nid);
 void hugetlb_show_meminfo(void);
@@ -358,7 +359,8 @@ static inline unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(
 
 static inline void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
-			unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page)
+			unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page,
+			unsigned long zap_flags)
 {
 	BUG();
 }
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index fa9af9c893512..f73a236b5a835 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4096,7 +4096,7 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
 
 void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			    unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
-			    struct page *ref_page)
+			    struct page *ref_page, unsigned long zap_flags)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	unsigned long address;
@@ -4148,6 +4148,19 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (unlikely(is_swap_special_pte(pte))) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte));
+			/*
+			 * Only drop the special swap uffd-wp pte if
+			 * e.g. unmapping a vma or punching a hole (with proper
+			 * lock held so that concurrent page fault won't happen).
+			 */
+			if (zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP)
+				huge_pte_clear(mm, address, ptep, sz);
+			spin_unlock(ptl);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Migrating hugepage or HWPoisoned hugepage is already
 		 * unmapped and its refcount is dropped, so just clear pte here.
@@ -4199,9 +4212,10 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			  struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
-			  unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page)
+			  unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page,
+			  unsigned long zap_flags)
 {
-	__unmap_hugepage_range(tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page);
+	__unmap_hugepage_range(tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page, zap_flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * Clear this flag so that x86's huge_pmd_share page_table_shareable
@@ -4217,12 +4231,13 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 }
 
 void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
-			  unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page)
+			  unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page,
+			  unsigned long zap_flags)
 {
 	struct mmu_gather tlb;
 
 	tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, vma->vm_mm);
-	__unmap_hugepage_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page);
+	__unmap_hugepage_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page, zap_flags);
 	tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
 }
 
@@ -4277,7 +4292,7 @@ static void unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 */
 		if (!is_vma_resv_set(iter_vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
 			unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma, address,
-					     address + huge_page_size(h), page);
+					     address + huge_page_size(h), page, 0);
 	}
 	i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
 }
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index f1cdc613b5887..99741c9254c5b 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1515,8 +1515,11 @@ static void unmap_single_vma(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 			 * safe to do nothing in this case.
 			 */
 			if (vma->vm_file) {
+				unsigned long zap_flags = details ?
+				    details->zap_flags : 0;
 				i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
-				__unmap_hugepage_range_final(tlb, vma, start, end, NULL);
+				__unmap_hugepage_range_final(tlb, vma, start, end,
+							     NULL, zap_flags);
 				i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
 			}
 		} else
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 23/24] mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
  2021-05-12 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

We've had all the necessary changes ready for both shmem and hugetlbfs.  Turn
on all the shmem/hugetlbfs switches for userfaultfd-wp.

Now we can remove the flags parameter for vma_can_userfault() since not used
any more.  Meanwhile, we can expand UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC with
_UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT too because all existing types now support write
protection mode.

Since vma_can_userfault() will be used elsewhere, move into userfaultfd_k.h.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 fs/userfaultfd.c                 | 19 -------------------
 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h    | 15 +++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h |  7 +++++--
 mm/userfaultfd.c                 | 10 +++-------
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index a41e0631af512..a436a1feb10db 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1275,25 +1275,6 @@ static __always_inline int validate_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline bool vma_can_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-				     unsigned long vm_flags)
-{
-	/* FIXME: add WP support to hugetlbfs and shmem */
-	if (vm_flags & VM_UFFD_WP) {
-		if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || vma_is_shmem(vma))
-			return false;
-	}
-
-	if (vm_flags & VM_UFFD_MINOR) {
-		/* FIXME: Add minor fault interception for shmem. */
-		if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
-			return false;
-	}
-
-	return vma_is_anonymous(vma) || is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) ||
-	       vma_is_shmem(vma);
-}
-
 static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 				unsigned long arg)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
index fefebe6e96560..95afd4814ab29 100644
--- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
+++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/fcntl.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h>
+#include <linux/hugetlb_inline.h>
 
 /* The set of all possible UFFD-related VM flags. */
 #define __VM_UFFD_FLAGS (VM_UFFD_MISSING | VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MINOR)
@@ -132,6 +133,20 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_armed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return vma->vm_flags & __VM_UFFD_FLAGS;
 }
 
+static inline bool vma_can_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+				     unsigned long vm_flags)
+{
+	if (vm_flags & VM_UFFD_MINOR) {
+		/* FIXME: Add minor fault interception for shmem. */
+		if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return vma_is_anonymous(vma) || is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) ||
+	       vma_is_shmem(vma);
+}
+
+
 extern int dup_userfaultfd(struct vm_area_struct *, struct list_head *);
 extern void dup_userfaultfd_complete(struct list_head *);
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
index bafbeb1a26245..298fbd4e2d1d3 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@
 			   UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_SHMEM |		\
 			   UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS |		\
 			   UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID |		\
-			   UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_HUGETLBFS)
+			   UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_HUGETLBFS |	\
+			   UFFD_FEATURE_WP_HUGETLBFS_SHMEM)
 #define UFFD_API_IOCTLS				\
 	((__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_REGISTER |		\
 	 (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_UNREGISTER |	\
@@ -45,7 +46,8 @@
 #define UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC		\
 	((__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_WAKE |		\
 	 (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_COPY |		\
-	 (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE)
+	 (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE |		\
+	 (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT)
 
 /*
  * Valid ioctl command number range with this API is from 0x00 to
@@ -196,6 +198,7 @@ struct uffdio_api {
 #define UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS			(1<<7)
 #define UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID			(1<<8)
 #define UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_HUGETLBFS		(1<<9)
+#define UFFD_FEATURE_WP_HUGETLBFS_SHMEM		(1<<10)
 	__u64 features;
 
 	__u64 ioctls;
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 2cd6ad5c3d8f8..3930e56aaefd8 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 			err = mfill_zeropage_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd,
 						 dst_vma, dst_addr);
 	} else {
-		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(wp_copy);
 		if (!zeropage)
 			err = shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd,
 						     dst_vma, dst_addr,
@@ -682,15 +681,12 @@ int mwriteprotect_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, unsigned long start,
 
 	err = -ENOENT;
 	dst_vma = find_dst_vma(dst_mm, start, len);
-	/*
-	 * Make sure the vma is not shared, that the dst range is
-	 * both valid and fully within a single existing vma.
-	 */
-	if (!dst_vma || (dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
+
+	if (!dst_vma)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	if (!userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma))
 		goto out_unlock;
-	if (!vma_is_anonymous(dst_vma))
+	if (!vma_can_userfault(dst_vma, dst_vma->vm_flags))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(dst_vma)) {
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 24/24] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 16:13 ` Peter Xu
  2021-05-12 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, peterx, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

After we added support for shmem and hugetlbfs, we can turn uffd-wp test on
always now.

Define HUGETLB_EXPECTED_IOCTLS to avoid using UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC,
because UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC is normally a superset of capabilities,
while the test may not satisfy them all.  E.g., when hugetlb registered without
minor mode, then we need to explicitly remove _UFFDIO_CONTINUE.  Same thing to
uffd-wp, as we'll need to explicitly remove _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT if not
registered with uffd-wp.

For the long term, we may consider dropping UFFD_API_* macros completely from
uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h header files, because it may cause kernel header
update to easily break userspace.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index 6339aeaeeff8b..cfa6c0e960e6a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int test_type;
 static volatile bool test_uffdio_copy_eexist = true;
 static volatile bool test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist = true;
 /* Whether to test uffd write-protection */
-static bool test_uffdio_wp = false;
+static bool test_uffdio_wp = true;
 /* Whether to test uffd minor faults */
 static bool test_uffdio_minor = false;
 
@@ -299,6 +299,9 @@ struct uffd_test_ops {
 					 (1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE) | \
 					 (1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT))
 
+#define HUGETLB_EXPECTED_IOCTLS		((1 << _UFFDIO_WAKE) |	\
+					 (1 << _UFFDIO_COPY))
+
 static struct uffd_test_ops anon_uffd_test_ops = {
 	.expected_ioctls = ANON_EXPECTED_IOCTLS,
 	.allocate_area	= anon_allocate_area,
@@ -314,7 +317,7 @@ static struct uffd_test_ops shmem_uffd_test_ops = {
 };
 
 static struct uffd_test_ops hugetlb_uffd_test_ops = {
-	.expected_ioctls = UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC & ~(1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE),
+	.expected_ioctls = HUGETLB_EXPECTED_IOCTLS,
 	.allocate_area	= hugetlb_allocate_area,
 	.release_pages	= hugetlb_release_pages,
 	.alias_mapping = hugetlb_alias_mapping,
@@ -1374,8 +1377,6 @@ static void set_test_type(const char *type)
 	if (!strcmp(type, "anon")) {
 		test_type = TEST_ANON;
 		uffd_test_ops = &anon_uffd_test_ops;
-		/* Only enable write-protect test for anonymous test */
-		test_uffdio_wp = true;
 	} else if (!strcmp(type, "hugetlb")) {
 		test_type = TEST_HUGETLB;
 		uffd_test_ops = &hugetlb_uffd_test_ops;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler
  2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-27 18:54   ` Peter Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-27 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz, Jason Gunthorpe,
	Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:12:58PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> File-backed memories are prone to unmap/swap so the ptes are always unstable.
> This could lead to userfaultfd-wp information got lost when unmapped or swapped
> out on such types of memory, for example, shmem.  To keep such an information
> persistent, we will start to use the newly introduced swap-like special ptes to
> replace a null pte when those ptes were removed.
> 
> Prepare this by handling such a special pte first before it is applied.  Here
> a new fault flag FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP is introduced.  When this flag is set, it

FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP does not exist any more.  Obviously I should have touched up
the commit message when touching up the code...

> means the current fault is to resolve a page access (either read or write) to
> the uffd-wp special pte.
> 
> The handling of this special pte page fault is similar to missing fault, but it
> should happen after the pte missing logic since the special pte is designed to
> be a swap-like pte.  Meanwhile it should be handled before do_swap_page() so
> that the swap core logic won't be confused to see such an illegal swap pte.
> 
> This is a slow path of uffd-wp handling, because unmap of wr-protected shmem
> ptes should be rare.  So far it should only trigger in two conditions:
> 
>   (1) When trying to punch holes in shmem_fallocate(), there will be a
>       pre-unmap optimization before evicting the page.  That will create
>       unmapped shmem ptes with wr-protected pages covered.
> 
>   (2) Swapping out of shmem pages
> 
> Because of this, the page fault handling is simplifed too by not sending the
> wr-protect message in the 1st page fault, instead the page will be installed
> read-only, so the message will be generated until the next do_wp_page() call.
> 
> Disable fault-around for such a special page fault, because the introduced new
> flag (FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP) only applies to current pte rather than all the pages

Same here.

> around it.  Doing fault-around with the new flag could confuse all the rest of
> pages when installing ptes from page cache when there's a cache hit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 11 +++++
>  mm/memory.c                   | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> index bc733512c6905..fefebe6e96560 100644
> --- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> +++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static inline bool uffd_disable_huge_pmd_share(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	return vma->vm_flags & (VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MINOR);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Don't do fault around for FAULT_FLAG_UFFD_WP because it means we want to

Same here...

> + * recover a previously wr-protected pte.  This flag is a per-pte information,
> + * so it could confuse all the pages around the current page when faulted in.
> + * Similar reason for MINOR mode faults.
> + */
> +static inline bool uffd_disable_fault_around(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	return vma->vm_flags & (VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MINOR);
> +}

-- 
Peter Xu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
@ 2021-04-28  0:07   ` Peter Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-04-28  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz, Jason Gunthorpe,
	Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:13:09PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> Hook up hugetlbfs_fault() with the capability to handle userfaultfd-wp faults.
> 
> We do this slightly earlier than hugetlb_cow() so that we can avoid taking some
> extra locks that we definitely don't need.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 629aa4c2259c8..8e234ee9a15e2 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4802,6 +4802,25 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (unlikely(!pte_same(entry, huge_ptep_get(ptep))))
>  		goto out_ptl;
>  
> +	/* Handle userfault-wp first, before trying to lock more pages */
> +	if (userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, huge_ptep_get(ptep)) &&

I'm going to change this to:

-       if (userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, huge_ptep_get(ptep)) &&
+       if (userfaultfd_wp(vma) && huge_pte_uffd_wp(huge_ptep_get(ptep)) &&

As strictly speaking it's not right to use userfaultfd_pte_wp() directly on a
huge pte...  Currently huge_pte_uffd_wp() is missing in this version (which is
still pte_uffd_wp() anyways), but I'll add a separate patch to introduce all
these helpers (also mention about what arch should do when the huge pte is not
handled the same way as small pte).  I'll try to keep Mike's R-b as this change
should be trivial, or please shoot.  Thanks,

> +	    (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && !huge_pte_write(entry)) {
> +		struct vm_fault vmf = {
> +			.vma = vma,
> +			.address = haddr,
> +			.flags = flags,
> +		};
> +
> +		spin_unlock(ptl);
> +		if (pagecache_page) {
> +			unlock_page(pagecache_page);
> +			put_page(pagecache_page);
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
> +		i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
> +		return handle_userfault(&vmf, VM_UFFD_WP);
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * hugetlb_cow() requires page locks of pte_page(entry) and
>  	 * pagecache_page, so here we need take the former one
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

-- 
Peter Xu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
  2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
                   ` (23 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
@ 2021-05-12 19:00 ` Peter Xu
  2021-05-14  7:07     ` Hugh Dickins
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-05-12 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hugh Dickins
  Cc: Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Hugh Dickins, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz, Jason Gunthorpe,
	Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:12:53PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> This is v2 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a
> kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series.

Ping..

Thinking about a repost, as this series shouldn't be able to apply after we've
got more relevant patches into -mm.  E.g., the full minor fault, and also some
small stuff like pagemap, as we need one more patch to support shmem/hugetlbfs
too.

Hugh, haven't received any further comment from you on shmem side (or on the
general idea).  It would be great to still have some of your input.

Let me know if you prefer to read a fresh new version otherwise.

Thanks!

-- 
Peter Xu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
  2021-05-12 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
@ 2021-05-14  7:07     ` Hugh Dickins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2021-05-14  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Xu
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hugh Dickins, Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin,
	Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

On Wed, 12 May 2021, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:12:53PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This is v2 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a
> > kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series.
> 
> Ping..
> 
> Thinking about a repost, as this series shouldn't be able to apply after we've
> got more relevant patches into -mm.  E.g., the full minor fault, and also some
> small stuff like pagemap, as we need one more patch to support shmem/hugetlbfs
> too.
> 
> Hugh, haven't received any further comment from you on shmem side (or on the
> general idea).  It would be great to still have some of your input.
> 
> Let me know if you prefer to read a fresh new version otherwise.

I am very sorry to let you down, Peter, repeatedly; but it is now very
clear that I shall *never* have time to review your patchset - I am too
slow, have too much else to attend to, and take too long each time to
sink myself deep enough into userfaultfd.

I realize that you're being considerate, and expecting no more than
a few comments from me, rather than asking for formal review; but it's
still too much for me to get into.

The only reason I was involved at all, was when you were wondering how
to handle the pagetable entries for shmem.  I suggested one encoding,
Andrea suggested slightly differently: Andrea's was more elegant (no
"swap type" required), and it looked like you went with his - good.

I wonder whether you noticed
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210407084238.20443-2-apopple@nvidia.com/
which might interfere.  I've had no more time to look at that than yours,
so no opinion on it (and I don't know what happened to it after that).

Please keep uppermost in mind when modifying mm/shmem.c for userfaultfd,
the difference between shared and private; and be on guard against the
ways in which CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y might open a door to abuse.

Thanks,
Hugh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
@ 2021-05-14  7:07     ` Hugh Dickins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2021-05-14  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Xu
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hugh Dickins, Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin,
	Mike Rapoport, Andrea Arcangeli, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

On Wed, 12 May 2021, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:12:53PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This is v2 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a
> > kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series.
> 
> Ping..
> 
> Thinking about a repost, as this series shouldn't be able to apply after we've
> got more relevant patches into -mm.  E.g., the full minor fault, and also some
> small stuff like pagemap, as we need one more patch to support shmem/hugetlbfs
> too.
> 
> Hugh, haven't received any further comment from you on shmem side (or on the
> general idea).  It would be great to still have some of your input.
> 
> Let me know if you prefer to read a fresh new version otherwise.

I am very sorry to let you down, Peter, repeatedly; but it is now very
clear that I shall *never* have time to review your patchset - I am too
slow, have too much else to attend to, and take too long each time to
sink myself deep enough into userfaultfd.

I realize that you're being considerate, and expecting no more than
a few comments from me, rather than asking for formal review; but it's
still too much for me to get into.

The only reason I was involved at all, was when you were wondering how
to handle the pagetable entries for shmem.  I suggested one encoding,
Andrea suggested slightly differently: Andrea's was more elegant (no
"swap type" required), and it looked like you went with his - good.

I wonder whether you noticed
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210407084238.20443-2-apopple@nvidia.com/
which might interfere.  I've had no more time to look at that than yours,
so no opinion on it (and I don't know what happened to it after that).

Please keep uppermost in mind when modifying mm/shmem.c for userfaultfd,
the difference between shared and private; and be on guard against the
ways in which CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y might open a door to abuse.

Thanks,
Hugh


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
  2021-05-14  7:07     ` Hugh Dickins
  (?)
@ 2021-05-14 13:18     ` Peter Xu
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2021-05-14 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hugh Dickins
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Nadav Amit, Miaohe Lin, Mike Rapoport,
	Andrea Arcangeli, Jerome Glisse, Mike Kravetz, Jason Gunthorpe,
	Matthew Wilcox, Andrew Morton, Axel Rasmussen,
	Kirill A . Shutemov

Hugh,

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:07:38AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2021, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:12:53PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > This is v2 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a
> > > kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series.
> > 
> > Ping..
> > 
> > Thinking about a repost, as this series shouldn't be able to apply after we've
> > got more relevant patches into -mm.  E.g., the full minor fault, and also some
> > small stuff like pagemap, as we need one more patch to support shmem/hugetlbfs
> > too.
> > 
> > Hugh, haven't received any further comment from you on shmem side (or on the
> > general idea).  It would be great to still have some of your input.
> > 
> > Let me know if you prefer to read a fresh new version otherwise.
> 
> I am very sorry to let you down, Peter, repeatedly; but it is now very
> clear that I shall *never* have time to review your patchset - I am too
> slow, have too much else to attend to, and take too long each time to
> sink myself deep enough into userfaultfd.

Never mind!  It's just that I'm kind of obliged to ask for your opinion as you
contributed part of the idea while you are also the shmem maintainer. :) So
that's what I did before I start to bother Andrew (since I know Andrew is 100%
busy.. that's also why I tend to not ask Andrew for review pings as best as I
can for all my works; while Andrew can chim in anytime anyways as in the loop).

> 
> I realize that you're being considerate, and expecting no more than
> a few comments from me, rather than asking for formal review; but it's
> still too much for me to get into.

I'm actually even be prepared to receive a full-series NACK anytime. :) To me
it's more important to have the right direction first, as I didn't receive that
during RFC so I moved on, assuming no one thinks it wrong.  However it's indeed
true that you never let me down (as far as I see from the other discussions)
that you do very in-depth review to hunt down any single potential risks you
may have noticed even in an rare error path - that's just too attractive a
reviewer to all the patch writters!

> 
> The only reason I was involved at all, was when you were wondering how
> to handle the pagetable entries for shmem.  I suggested one encoding,
> Andrea suggested slightly differently: Andrea's was more elegant (no
> "swap type" required), and it looked like you went with his - good.
> 
> I wonder whether you noticed
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210407084238.20443-2-apopple@nvidia.com/
> which might interfere.  I've had no more time to look at that than yours,
> so no opinion on it (and I don't know what happened to it after that).

Thanks for the pointer.  Looks like there'll be some slight rebase work and
totally orthogonal on the ideas, then we'll see who will do the rebase (yeh
probably me :).

Hmm, meanwhile if that's the initial versions I might go and suggest a renaming
of pfn_swap_entry_to_page() to start with pte_swp_*() as it operates on swp pte
not a pfn.  However probably too late for a v8 series so I'll give up.  It also
has mentioned something like "special swap pte", hope that won't get confused
with what this series is proposing.  We'll see when it becomes a problem, so
far seems still okay.

> 
> Please keep uppermost in mind when modifying mm/shmem.c for userfaultfd,
> the difference between shared and private; and be on guard against the
> ways in which CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y might open a door to abuse.

Will do.  Then I'll move this series on.

Re shared/private, let me mention one thing just in case for any use of peace
of mind: the most dangerous place for uffd-wp+shmem should be the
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT page resolving ioctl when we want to re-grant the write bit
to ptes if needed (for minor mode, the danger point is UFFDIO_CONTINUE
instead), however it should be even safer than UFFDIO_CONTINUE as
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT never grants the write bit for real but leave that all to
page fault handler (in change_pte_range()):

                } else if (uffd_wp_resolve) {
                        /*
                         * Leave the write bit to be handled
                         * by PF interrupt handler, then
                         * things like COW could be properly
                         * handled.
                         */
                        ptent = pte_clear_uffd_wp(ptent);
                }

While the newprot will never have the write bit either afaik, mwriteprotect_range():

		newprot = vm_get_page_prot(dst_vma->vm_flags);

The last risk is the dirty_accountable trick in change_pte_range(), but as you
analyzed in the other thread, userfaultfd never uses MM_CP_DIRTY_ACCT, so it
should be safe too.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-14 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
2021-04-27 18:54   ` Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages() Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork() Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
2021-04-28  0:07   ` Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-05-12 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-05-14  7:07   ` Hugh Dickins
2021-05-14  7:07     ` Hugh Dickins
2021-05-14 13:18     ` Peter Xu

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.