From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7D8C433B4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95687613D6 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233689AbhEUMEE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 08:04:04 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:33813 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229512AbhEUMEA (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 08:04:00 -0400 IronPort-SDR: X/buWrz5u4i3jCj29A2ch7GP900Z9J2JB6Nlwm6QSS84JuswF3CEB9JetDbz7Ryh4VBc2KMl8S LQoGBzURDG4Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9990"; a="181078792" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="181078792" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2021 05:02:15 -0700 IronPort-SDR: KV+7S5Plh5E5Qs4JvsHLaF2a4JpNQYVNUTBaLNLl557BLxepRNe+zNWuORARXlRfrW6cbbgPIz LauFKMTKn2xA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="474496344" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2021 05:02:13 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lk3r1-00Dhc5-6S; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:02:11 +0300 Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:02:11 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel.h: split out panic and oops helpers (ia64 fix) Message-ID: References: <20210520130557.55277-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <41bbace7-1b09-8464-a082-e4152f07fdb4@physik.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41bbace7-1b09-8464-a082-e4152f07fdb4@physik.fu-berlin.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:24:08AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 5/20/21 3:17 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:12:24PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> On 5/20/21 3:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> Note, this patch is untested. I have no ia64 compiler at hand. > > > >> I can test it later today. > > > > Appreciate it, thanks! > > > > This is against Linux Next (where Andrew's patches are sitting for a while). > > I just pulled linux-next and was able to build a kernel for my RX-2600 without any > problems. Since your patch is already in the tree, I assume it's correct. > > Do you want me to test anything else? I can test-boot the kernel later, but I want > to avoid that now since I don't want to turn on the noisy server while at home :-) Nothing is required anymore, thanks for your help with testing! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:02:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel.h: split out panic and oops helpers (ia64 fix) Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20210520130557.55277-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <41bbace7-1b09-8464-a082-e4152f07fdb4@physik.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <41bbace7-1b09-8464-a082-e4152f07fdb4@physik.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , kernel test robot On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:24:08AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 5/20/21 3:17 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:12:24PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> On 5/20/21 3:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> Note, this patch is untested. I have no ia64 compiler at hand. > > > >> I can test it later today. > > > > Appreciate it, thanks! > > > > This is against Linux Next (where Andrew's patches are sitting for a while). > > I just pulled linux-next and was able to build a kernel for my RX-2600 without any > problems. Since your patch is already in the tree, I assume it's correct. > > Do you want me to test anything else? I can test-boot the kernel later, but I want > to avoid that now since I don't want to turn on the noisy server while at home :-) Nothing is required anymore, thanks for your help with testing! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko