From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: improve DRM fbdev emulation device names Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 17:33:44 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YKfS2GDCXPJ/q8gT@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210521131910.3000689-1-javierm@redhat.com> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Framebuffer devices that are registered by DRM drivers for fbdev emulation > have a "drmfb" suffix in their name. But makes them to be quite confusing > if a driver already has "drm" in its name: > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 rockchipdrmdrmfb > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 simpledrmdrmfb > > Instead, let's just add a "-fb" suffix to denote that are DRM drivers FB: > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 rockchipdrm-fb > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 simpledrm-fb > > Suggested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their name? Also I'm never sure how much these are uapi or not ... -Daniel > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > index f6baa204612..bbaff92c509 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > @@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ void drm_fb_helper_fill_info(struct fb_info *info, > sizes->fb_width, sizes->fb_height); > > info->par = fb_helper; > - snprintf(info->fix.id, sizeof(info->fix.id), "%sdrmfb", > + snprintf(info->fix.id, sizeof(info->fix.id), "%s-fb", > fb_helper->dev->driver->name); > > } > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: improve DRM fbdev emulation device names Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 17:33:44 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YKfS2GDCXPJ/q8gT@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210521131910.3000689-1-javierm@redhat.com> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Framebuffer devices that are registered by DRM drivers for fbdev emulation > have a "drmfb" suffix in their name. But makes them to be quite confusing > if a driver already has "drm" in its name: > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 rockchipdrmdrmfb > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 simpledrmdrmfb > > Instead, let's just add a "-fb" suffix to denote that are DRM drivers FB: > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 rockchipdrm-fb > > $ cat /proc/fb > 0 simpledrm-fb > > Suggested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their name? Also I'm never sure how much these are uapi or not ... -Daniel > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > index f6baa204612..bbaff92c509 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > @@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ void drm_fb_helper_fill_info(struct fb_info *info, > sizes->fb_width, sizes->fb_height); > > info->par = fb_helper; > - snprintf(info->fix.id, sizeof(info->fix.id), "%sdrmfb", > + snprintf(info->fix.id, sizeof(info->fix.id), "%s-fb", > fb_helper->dev->driver->name); > > } > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 15:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-21 13:19 Javier Martinez Canillas 2021-05-21 13:19 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2021-05-21 15:33 ` Daniel Vetter [this message] 2021-05-21 15:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-05-21 16:53 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2021-05-21 17:18 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2021-05-21 18:53 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2021-05-25 13:08 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-05-25 13:08 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-05-25 13:34 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2021-05-25 13:52 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YKfS2GDCXPJ/q8gT@phenom.ffwll.local \ --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=javierm@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=mripard@kernel.org \ --cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \ --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: improve DRM fbdev emulation device names' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.