All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	maz@kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Prepare to run multiple configs at once
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:56:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLgakV2Eru1J2f4K@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531103344.29325-3-drjones@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 12:33:41PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> We don't want to have to create a new binary for each vcpu config, so
> prepare to run the test for multiple vcpu configs in a single binary.
> We do this by factoring out the test from main() and then looping over
> configs. When given '--list' we still never print more than a single
> reg-list for a single vcpu config though, because it would be confusing
> otherwise.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>

> ---
>  .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c      | 68 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> index 7bb09ce20dde..14fc8d82e30f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ struct vcpu_config {
>  	struct reg_sublist sublists[];
>  };
>  
> -static struct vcpu_config vregs_config;
> -static struct vcpu_config sve_config;
> +static struct vcpu_config *vcpu_configs[];
> +static int vcpu_configs_n;
>  
>  #define for_each_sublist(c, s)							\
>  	for ((s) = &(c)->sublists[0]; (s)->regs; ++(s))
> @@ -400,29 +400,20 @@ static void check_supported(struct vcpu_config *c)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -int main(int ac, char **av)
> +static bool print_list;
> +static bool print_filtered;
> +static bool fixup_core_regs;
> +
> +static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
>  {
> -	struct vcpu_config *c = reg_list_sve() ? &sve_config : &vregs_config;
>  	struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
>  	int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n;
>  	int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0;
> -	bool print_list = false, print_filtered = false, fixup_core_regs = false;
>  	struct kvm_vm *vm;
>  	struct reg_sublist *s;
>  
>  	check_supported(c);
>  
> -	for (i = 1; i < ac; ++i) {
> -		if (strcmp(av[i], "--core-reg-fixup") == 0)
> -			fixup_core_regs = true;
> -		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list") == 0)
> -			print_list = true;
> -		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list-filtered") == 0)
> -			print_filtered = true;
> -		else
> -			TEST_FAIL("Unknown option: %s\n", av[i]);
> -	}
> -
>  	vm = vm_create(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES, O_RDWR);
>  	prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init);
>  	aarch64_vcpu_add_default(vm, 0, &init, NULL);
> @@ -442,7 +433,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  				print_reg(c, id);
>  		}
>  		putchar('\n');
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -541,6 +532,44 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  		    "%d registers failed get; %d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject",
>  		    config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject);
>  
> +	pr_info("%s: PASS\n", config_name(c));
> +	blessed_n = 0;
> +	free(blessed_reg);
> +	free(reg_list);
> +	kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int ac, char **av)
> +{
> +	struct vcpu_config *c, *sel = NULL;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 1; i < ac; ++i) {
> +		if (strcmp(av[i], "--core-reg-fixup") == 0)
> +			fixup_core_regs = true;
> +		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list") == 0)
> +			print_list = true;
> +		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list-filtered") == 0)
> +			print_filtered = true;
> +		else
> +			TEST_FAIL("Unknown option: %s\n", av[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (print_list || print_filtered) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We only want to print the register list of a single config.
> +		 * TODO: Add command line support to pick which config.
> +		 */
> +		sel = vcpu_configs[0];
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) {
> +		c = vcpu_configs[i];
> +		if (sel && c != sel)
> +			continue;
> +		run_test(c);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -945,3 +974,8 @@ static struct vcpu_config sve_config = {
>  	{0},
>  	},
>  };
> +
> +static struct vcpu_config *vcpu_configs[] = {
> +	reg_list_sve() ? &sve_config : &vregs_config,
> +};
> +static int vcpu_configs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu_configs);
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Prepare to run multiple configs at once
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:56:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLgakV2Eru1J2f4K@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531103344.29325-3-drjones@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 12:33:41PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> We don't want to have to create a new binary for each vcpu config, so
> prepare to run the test for multiple vcpu configs in a single binary.
> We do this by factoring out the test from main() and then looping over
> configs. When given '--list' we still never print more than a single
> reg-list for a single vcpu config though, because it would be confusing
> otherwise.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>

> ---
>  .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c      | 68 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> index 7bb09ce20dde..14fc8d82e30f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ struct vcpu_config {
>  	struct reg_sublist sublists[];
>  };
>  
> -static struct vcpu_config vregs_config;
> -static struct vcpu_config sve_config;
> +static struct vcpu_config *vcpu_configs[];
> +static int vcpu_configs_n;
>  
>  #define for_each_sublist(c, s)							\
>  	for ((s) = &(c)->sublists[0]; (s)->regs; ++(s))
> @@ -400,29 +400,20 @@ static void check_supported(struct vcpu_config *c)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -int main(int ac, char **av)
> +static bool print_list;
> +static bool print_filtered;
> +static bool fixup_core_regs;
> +
> +static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
>  {
> -	struct vcpu_config *c = reg_list_sve() ? &sve_config : &vregs_config;
>  	struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
>  	int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n;
>  	int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0;
> -	bool print_list = false, print_filtered = false, fixup_core_regs = false;
>  	struct kvm_vm *vm;
>  	struct reg_sublist *s;
>  
>  	check_supported(c);
>  
> -	for (i = 1; i < ac; ++i) {
> -		if (strcmp(av[i], "--core-reg-fixup") == 0)
> -			fixup_core_regs = true;
> -		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list") == 0)
> -			print_list = true;
> -		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list-filtered") == 0)
> -			print_filtered = true;
> -		else
> -			TEST_FAIL("Unknown option: %s\n", av[i]);
> -	}
> -
>  	vm = vm_create(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES, O_RDWR);
>  	prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init);
>  	aarch64_vcpu_add_default(vm, 0, &init, NULL);
> @@ -442,7 +433,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  				print_reg(c, id);
>  		}
>  		putchar('\n');
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -541,6 +532,44 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  		    "%d registers failed get; %d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject",
>  		    config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject);
>  
> +	pr_info("%s: PASS\n", config_name(c));
> +	blessed_n = 0;
> +	free(blessed_reg);
> +	free(reg_list);
> +	kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int ac, char **av)
> +{
> +	struct vcpu_config *c, *sel = NULL;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 1; i < ac; ++i) {
> +		if (strcmp(av[i], "--core-reg-fixup") == 0)
> +			fixup_core_regs = true;
> +		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list") == 0)
> +			print_list = true;
> +		else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list-filtered") == 0)
> +			print_filtered = true;
> +		else
> +			TEST_FAIL("Unknown option: %s\n", av[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (print_list || print_filtered) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We only want to print the register list of a single config.
> +		 * TODO: Add command line support to pick which config.
> +		 */
> +		sel = vcpu_configs[0];
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) {
> +		c = vcpu_configs[i];
> +		if (sel && c != sel)
> +			continue;
> +		run_test(c);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -945,3 +974,8 @@ static struct vcpu_config sve_config = {
>  	{0},
>  	},
>  };
> +
> +static struct vcpu_config *vcpu_configs[] = {
> +	reg_list_sve() ? &sve_config : &vregs_config,
> +};
> +static int vcpu_configs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu_configs);
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-31 10:33 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fix get-reg-list Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Introduce vcpu configs Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33   ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:40   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-02 23:40     ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-03 12:14     ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-03 12:14       ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Prepare to run multiple configs at once Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33   ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:56   ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2021-06-02 23:56     ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Provide config selection option Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33   ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-03  0:03   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-03  0:03     ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Remove get-reg-list-sve Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33   ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-03  0:09   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-03  0:09     ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Split base and pmu registers Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33   ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:26   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-02 23:26     ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-22  7:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fix get-reg-list Andrew Jones
2021-06-22  7:07   ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-22  7:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-22  7:32     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-22  7:48     ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-22  7:48       ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-22  7:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-22  7:57   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLgakV2Eru1J2f4K@google.com \
    --to=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.