From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C31142FB8
	for <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f09b9000c5f6a5325ce378c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f09:b900:c5f:6a53:25ce:378c])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 3E1DE1EC04DB;
	Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:50:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
	t=1623700219;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
	bh=9YY3xAUgDz0EUh/pTeFLuR4h6BtRben1A76O8bKSCS4=;
	b=Jt47Xz5W/6Qvfgerh3MVE24F5/Tn1CluSb47AQVTTILN/PaJ7nWjQUpDTPTGXTp0tDG21W
	TggwwZfiPtrBh6i1M3hI1h41NT8b7ver/35pKyd0ggOpu1QJ7xqdTCqHjMXvvyG4MfMDlL
	HlI12X8iQE4A9fA1yqcWFqkftOL+fL0=
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:50:11 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, tony.luck@intel.com,
	npmccallum@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 16/22] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping
 for the SEV-ES save area
Message-ID: <YMey8xMXLcB/0WnA@zn.tnic>
References: <20210602140416.23573-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <20210602140416.23573-17-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <YMc2R4JRZ3yFffy/@zn.tnic>
 <f6ad5b50-f462-35e1-3be4-e7113feee3a9@amd.com>
X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <linux-coco.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-coco+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-coco+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f6ad5b50-f462-35e1-3be4-e7113feee3a9@amd.com>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 02:34:03PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> I guess we can call it just prot_save_area or protected_save_area or even
> encrypted_save_area (no need for guest, since guest is implied, e.g. we
> don't call the normal save area guest_save_area).

All three sound good to me.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette