From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1801C49361 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822486023D for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233470AbhFPU2C (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:28:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49048 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233451AbhFPU2B (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:28:01 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3AA9C061574; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ltc6R-0094hM-5b; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:25:35 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:25:35 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Michael Schmitz , linux-arch , Jens Axboe , Oleg Nesterov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , alpha , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k , Arnd Bergmann , Ley Foon Tan , Tejun Heo , Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] alpha/ptrace: Add missing switch_stack frames Message-ID: References: <6e47eff8-d0a4-8390-1222-e975bfbf3a65@gmail.com> <924ec53c-2fd9-2e1c-bbb1-3fda49809be4@gmail.com> <87eed4v2dc.fsf@disp2133> <5929e116-fa61-b211-342a-c706dcb834ca@gmail.com> <87fsxjorgs.fsf@disp2133> <87zgvqor7d.fsf_-_@disp2133> <87mtrpg47k.fsf@disp2133> <87pmwlek8d.fsf_-_@disp2133> <87eed1ek31.fsf_-_@disp2133> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eed1ek31.fsf_-_@disp2133> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:32:50PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > -.macro fork_like name > +.macro allregs name > .align 4 > .globl alpha_\name > .ent alpha_\name > + .cfi_startproc > alpha_\name: > .prologue 0 > - bsr $1, do_switch_stack > + SAVE_SWITCH_STACK > jsr $26, sys_\name > - ldq $26, 56($sp) > - lda $sp, SWITCH_STACK_SIZE($sp) > + RESTORE_SWITCH_STACK No. You've just added one hell of an overhead to fork(2), for no reason whatsoever. sys_fork() et.al. does *NOT* modify the callee-saved registers; it's plain C. So this change is complete BS. > +allregs exit > +allregs exit_group Details, please - what exactly makes exit(2) different from e.g. open(2)?