From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC711C2B9F4 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A941F61405 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232488AbhFQOgZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:36:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37220 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231346AbhFQOgW (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:36:22 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE55C061574; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0eb20047e0d50d7eeccd9e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0e:b200:47e0:d50d:7eec:cd9e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 407621EC0587; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:34:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1623940452; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=9A4uzd20AoYeVEiUFQvdsQsn30sk6E2K/EhLxqxg+EQ=; b=gHgITpKSzKbtDNybTfBzGlTdSvlSKZwAKA1n4ZZGggpfiYFEOKpy8+Gw5/R4uUlLjwCnST otpX9GZlcXkvdkh1pBA0ql0EkStmW76B/GIbmmpI6Y4ZwFQyDNTgzXWTb9I+H3hiCB6PvJ JmLV4AumAvBlK3ikYMB33x56owU2aME= Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:34:01 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Kai Huang Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, Yang Zhong Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is destroyed Message-ID: References: <20210615101639.291929-1-kai.huang@intel.com> <20210615132001.kd6cuktq37dvoq3l@kernel.org> <618b42d66a4f2087ef4c54cc50fd56d01233eab1.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <618b42d66a4f2087ef4c54cc50fd56d01233eab1.camel@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:30:04PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote: > Thanks Jarkko. I literally need to find some way to avoid such error in future :) That way is called "integrate checkpatch.pl into your patch creation workflow". -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette