From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7C9C48BC2 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECBF611BD for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229876AbhFUNg5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:36:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229708AbhFUNg4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:36:56 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2EBC061574; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:34:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=CNc3Xrd1K/29qEhkYTyaxdo3gNoefxPfA82KPR08cuk=; b=UZA5zknswNexCVjedhqpVnPkpR jRvjNhwuxJabuyR3UILC2fJTLArSkub5DrIrVf3s2tVutN33fBI2I+Fdj5m3pnfgWVzVvw5KB7bTL aOSJRCaBA0/DCBgV/Y8zsJz/StwXe8g5J00PdKRs9RSJLw2IDAXjnBvqEVMoCbaPK7NVVb33QcOqI EPWwPF4jCTxRXqgQO4IUM8DgDmIpZ+NMnhM5dlZjjQWwJJT6g5iJtU6HXN6Bur/NEKi0pJZrK2Eps njtjkvO8OnwRH69da/OY+MMYanN2x8Cxk/dcpP6Z7KSk8sSqqU80EjQ8wN49XH7UmLDMRXciOTVqs l85eq8nw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lvK4I-00AFPk-GY; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:34:33 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D72DD3001C0; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:34:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B7AE5200E3586; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:34:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:34:32 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Josh Poimboeuf , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 16 (objtool: warnings) Message-ID: References: <20210416213625.14542675@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:50:49AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/16/21 4:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20210415: > > > on x86_64, objtool is not liking retpoline.o: > > $ gcc --version > gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 > > > Is there already a patch for these? > > > ===== build-r8840.out ===== > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_rax()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_rbx()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_rcx()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_rdx()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_rsi()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_rdi()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_rbp()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r8()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r9()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r10()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r11()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r12()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r13()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r14()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup > arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: __x86_indirect_alt_call_r15()+0x0: call without frame pointer save/setup Damn, sorry I missed this. I know what the problem is, but I've yet to find a solution that's not terrible... hold on.