From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:59:42 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] make: Add make test{, -c, -c-run, -shell-run} targets In-Reply-To: <20210618191252.12403-1-pvorel@suse.cz> References: <20210618191252.12403-1-pvorel@suse.cz> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > For testing C and shell API. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > --- > Hi all, > > another attempt for make test target. > > In a long term, I'd like to wrap the execution with some script, as I > suppose there will be some metadata in test, allowing to run tests which > don't TPASS or TBROK (we have quite a lot of them). Then the summary > would be even more useful. > > FIXME: broken in lib/, it runs all test twice. > > changes v1->v2: > Not sure if it's a good approach to process each test separately, > there is no loop as Cyril suggested in [1], thus there is no summary > what happen. > > I previously had in similar loop in include/mk/generic_leaf_target.inc: > > test-c-run: $(TEST_TARGETS) > @set -e; echo; echo "===== Test C API ====="; \ > for i in $(TEST_TARGETS); do \ > echo; echo "* $$i"; \ > echo "PATH $(top_srcdir)/testcases/lib:$$PATH"; \ > PATH="$(top_srcdir)/testcases/lib:$$PATH" ./$$i || [ $$? -eq 32 ]; \ > done; echo; \ > echo "All C API tests passed or TCONF" > > test-shell-run: > @set -e; echo; echo "===== Test shell API ====="; \ > for i in $(TEST_SHELL_TARGETS); do \ > echo; echo "* $$i"; \ > PATH="$(abs_top_srcdir)/testcases/lib:$(abs_top_builddir)/testcases/lib:$$PATH" $(abs_srcdir)/$$i || [ $$? -eq 32 ]; \ > done; echo; \ > echo "All shell API tests passed or TCONF" > > but that was problematic in lib (which uses generic_leaf_target.inc). Why not just add runtest.sh into newlib_tests/ that would do all the work, then we can forget about all the trickery and just run the scritp on 'make test-c'. Well we would have to call make in newlib_tests first to make sure it was compiled, but that should be it. And the same for testcases/lib/. I do not think that adding a target per a testcase is sane. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz