From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0129C49EA6 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1EC60231 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231969AbhFXSSz (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:18:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229464AbhFXSSy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:18:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6151C061760 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id b5-20020a17090a9905b029016fc06f6c5bso3992515pjp.5 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:16:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=K1Vvz0R8sB1MrhAUrVKdo5XFWAZZznbutBePEdxRrcc=; b=PPx52G7la9rHzbW0oKjBSV8cFqiqBh8ceNwTpux5CfVJy4tDbvFX8DTmOrpKinapS/ 3Bkf0giuIUahiy6uDkKq3YV1GUNsSkqfonG6kfgxXBgFa7c3Ehp54EtZhAH7e1cesXvD 3GzqZnbgU0Mo6FfIe9zIItJNXO6Hcvl41m2mOsBiVw6HPOuaPWXUI1xPNCcoTbFAa1zk 7ldV0kfRYWEMGlYt49D7Rqx0mFd5bJHpFYfpByFFXyutCchOh9QjgBBIEujaWZM3xF6P nGnSJzDVsszCUBcIXO6aX+XpgOHpefLPGQDxWmUb7i5fyME+dut7bdG7MUM2MBe/7VRc wsyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=K1Vvz0R8sB1MrhAUrVKdo5XFWAZZznbutBePEdxRrcc=; b=iZCYUr3JhX/2HuDsgBmDHlMynih+tL/bgJj/dkuCdRxCMOO8FdkjJwgl3hktKGdpSy 0m4S9xL+ugs4+Y6aoApzvpFEJfiFQKJTfiY/FF40n+4C4e4UfI5Ex8LVsUW7TeOUyoHY 14I/xIUev+BmbYFyY+QSegnKuVahZ3BvpgsXJB9m96nGtVJqMw8ULyKLoz617P+D0jiK nOJvM+o1iNuGZrDWCQfPOfiVqLT3i5hi5d8nTey9aU3wounWl2yREWAL0h6cJsaTDVio 0H4FSo5deCqWF+jLpvghq/km/oXho/fpoA2P6h/blQueu+qkHTQmOrgxpVBwZQntBlYh qo6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531euK0HcFQjRFr6dwi6JF00WqpjrC1FHFQez6oYuMWwMiG4Fciz jxzMUoGThamTopU3CuoDRhRQ2qIx4VsPXw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypc7+VJoyZZjM9cUFg2OnFuuDA/oB2WudbdSM2FTssommGI8IeGUJzr6p8LzWuKJ35pIL+WA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8b0d:: with SMTP id y13mr6857385pjn.88.1624558592002; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm3556497pfe.98.2021.06.24.11.16.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:16:28 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 05/12] nSVM: Remove NPT reserved bits tests (new one on the way) Message-ID: References: <20210622210047.3691840-1-seanjc@google.com> <20210622210047.3691840-6-seanjc@google.com> <2f1c2605-e588-2eea-d2c1-ab2f4fdc531d@redhat.com> <6ae872e2-0de6-9c17-89df-ff29c43228d0@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6ae872e2-0de6-9c17-89df-ff29c43228d0@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 24, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 24/06/21 19:43, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > ./x86/run x86/svm.flat -smp 2 -cpu max,+svm -m 4g \ > > > -append 'npt_rw npt_rw_pfwalk' > > Any chance you're running against an older KVM version? The test passes if I > > run against a build with my MMU pile on top of kvm/queue, but fails on a random > > older KVM. > > I'm running it against the current kvm/queue. Huh. Still passes for me on 292fedba687b ("Merge branch 'kvm-c-bit' into HEAD"). I'm running on AMD EPYC 7B12 / Rome, if that helps at all.