All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, lars@metafoo.de,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Nuno Sa <Nuno.Sa@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] iio:adc:ad7280a Cleanup and proposed staging graduation.
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:08:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOyFE/yHrLQxKpkU@marsc.168.1.7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210711155051.713c1207@jic23-huawei>

On 07/11, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:37:41 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 14:36:17 -0300
> > Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hey Jonathan,
> > > 
> > > On 06/14, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> > > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > 
> > > > This one proved an interesting diversion.
> > > > 
> > > > Work done against a somewhat hacked up QEMU emulation of 3 daisy chained
> > > > ad7280a devices (18 channels).  Note that the emulation isn't complete
> > > > but does do chaining, CRC, and readout of channels etc in a fashion that
> > > > worked with the original driver (up to the bug in patch 1) and continues
> > > > to work with the updated version. I've not intention to upstream the
> > > > emulation (as would need to make it more completed and flexible), but
> > > > happy to share it with anyone who is interested.    
> > > 
> > > I'm interested in seeing your device emulation with QEMU.
> > > I was looking at the ad7150 emulation you shared earlier this year but had
> > > some trouble getting the i2c slave created.  
> > 
> > Sure.  Let me do a bit of tidying up they I'll push a suitable branch out.
> > (probably will still have lots of stuff missing!)
> > 
> > Might take a little while to get to this though.
> 
> I pretended to myself for a few weeks that I'd get around to tidying this up in
> a remotely meaningful way.  That's clearly not happening so I pushed out the
> untidy version with appropriate eats babies messages:
> 
> https://github.com/jic23/qemu/commits/ad7280a-hacks

Thanks. I don't mind if it's not exactly tidy or elegant code provided I
can understand whats going on and get it running.

> 
> Note there is loads of stuff that isn't implemented as it was developed alongside
> this patch series to verify individual patches rather than with the intent of
> actually emulating the device.
> 
OK, will be aware of that.

> It's hard coded to 2 a chain of 3 ad7280a devices because that seemed to hit most possible
> corner cases.
> 
> The top commit has the launch string I'm using.  You'll need a filesystem, but
> you can probably use one of the convenient ones debian posts as nocloud cloud
> images. 
> 
> There is some info on that on people.kernel.org/jic23 as I wrote up how to test
> CXL stuff on ARM recently and gave guidance on easy ways to get a filesystem.
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/sid/daily/20210702-691/debian-sid-nocloud-arm64-daily-20210702-691.qcow2
> will probably work and is more recent than the one linked from that blog post. 

I was using a debian imgage created from following the instructions on a
tutorial pointed by the QEMU docs.
https://translatedcode.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/installing-debian-on-qemus-64-bit-arm-virt-board/
Anyhow, I'll chance to the nocloud one if see things don't get working.

> 
> Give me a shout if you need more specific guidance than this very very rough guide!

Sure, let's see if I can get through it now. Otherwise ...

> 
> I mentioned this thread in the diversion the rust on linux thread took into
> use of QEMU to emulate devices which motivated me to stop being lazy and at least
> post this hideous version.  Probably the most useful bit is how to get a working
> spi device emulated on the arm virt machine as that is very handy for all manner
> of testing.  One day someone might implement a large set of IIO device emulation
> and bolt it into a CI...

Agree, it's hard to get IIO drivers runtime tested because we often don't
have the required hardware to do it. I think emulation would help us with
that or, at least, would give us a little bit more confidence in our
changes than just relying on sharp eyes and compile/static tests.
Puching that into a CI would also be rather nice.

> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Being able to see it running, I may feel more confident to provide a review
> > > for this set :)  
> > 
> > :)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Marcelo  
> > > > 
> > > > I briefly flirted with posting a patch to just drop the driver entirely,
> > > > but the part is still available and it looked like fun + isn't going
> > > > to greatly impact maintainability of the subsystem long term so is low
> > > > cost even if it goes obsolete sometime soonish.
> > > > 
> > > > There are lots of things we could do after this set to improved the driver
> > > > and make things more flexible, but it should basically 'just work'
> > > > 
> > > > Anyhow, as normal for staging graduations, last patch has rename detection
> > > > turned off so that people can easily see what I am proposing we move
> > > > out of staging.
> > > > 
> > > > Jonathan Cameron (17):
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Fix handing of device address bit reversing.
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Register define cleanup.
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: rename _read() to _read_reg()
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Split buff[2] into tx and rx parts
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Use bitfield ops to managed fields in
> > > >     transfers.
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Switch to standard event control
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Standardize extended ABI naming
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Drop unused timestamp channel.
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Trivial comment formatting cleanup
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Make oversampling_ratio a runtime control
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Cleanup includes
> > > >   staging:iio:ad7280a: Reflect optionality of irq in ABI
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Use a local dev pointer to avoid &spi->dev
> > > >   staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Use device properties to replace platform
> > > >     data.
> > > >   dt-bindings:iio:adc:ad7280a: Add binding
> > > >   iio:adc:ad7280a: Document ABI for cell balance switches
> > > >   iio:adc:ad7280a: Move out of staging
> > > > 
> > > >  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-ad7280a     |   14 +
> > > >  .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7280a.yaml         |   87 ++
> > > >  drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                       |   11 +
> > > >  drivers/iio/adc/Makefile                      |    1 +
> > > >  drivers/iio/adc/ad7280a.c                     | 1116 +++++++++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/staging/iio/adc/Kconfig               |   11 -
> > > >  drivers/staging/iio/adc/Makefile              |    1 -
> > > >  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c             | 1044 ---------------
> > > >  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.h             |   37 -
> > > >  9 files changed, 1229 insertions(+), 1093 deletions(-)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-ad7280a
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7280a.yaml
> > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> > > >  delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> > > >  delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.h
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.32.0
> > > >     
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14 11:34 [PATCH 00/17] iio:adc:ad7280a Cleanup and proposed staging graduation Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 01/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Fix handing of device address bit reversing Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 02/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Register define cleanup Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 03/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: rename _read() to _read_reg() Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 04/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Split buff[2] into tx and rx parts Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 05/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Use bitfield ops to managed fields in transfers Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 06/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Switch to standard event control Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 07/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Standardize extended ABI naming Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 08/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Drop unused timestamp channel Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:34 ` [PATCH 09/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Trivial comment formatting cleanup Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 10/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Make oversampling_ratio a runtime control Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 11/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Cleanup includes Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 12/17] staging:iio:ad7280a: Reflect optionality of irq in ABI Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 13/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Use a local dev pointer to avoid &spi->dev Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 14/17] staging:iio:adc:ad7280a: Use device properties to replace platform data Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 15/17] dt-bindings:iio:adc:ad7280a: Add binding Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-24 20:28   ` Rob Herring
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 16/17] iio:adc:ad7280a: Document ABI for cell balance switches Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-14 11:35 ` [PATCH 17/17] iio:adc:ad7280a: Move out of staging Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 00/17] iio:adc:ad7280a Cleanup and proposed staging graduation Marcelo Schmitt
2021-06-23  8:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-11 14:50     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-12 18:08       ` Marcelo Schmitt [this message]
2021-08-05  3:52         ` Marcelo Schmitt
2021-08-05 12:51           ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YOyFE/yHrLQxKpkU@marsc.168.1.7 \
    --to=marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=Nuno.Sa@analog.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.