On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:11:01PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> The switch case of writing PCI 1 IO base address had an extra break
> statement that made part of the code unreachable. This did not cause a
> problem as guests ususally leave this register at its default value.
> 
> Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1458135)
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>

Applied to ppc-for-6.1, thanks.

> ---
>  hw/pci-host/mv64361.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci-host/mv64361.c b/hw/pci-host/mv64361.c
> index 20510d8680..92b0f5d047 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-host/mv64361.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-host/mv64361.c
> @@ -687,7 +687,6 @@ static void mv64361_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val,
>      case MV64340_PCI_1_IO_BASE_ADDR:
>          s->pci[1].io_base = val & 0x30fffffULL;
>          warn_swap_bit(val);
> -        break;
>          if (!(s->cpu_conf & BIT(27))) {
>              s->pci[1].remap[4] = (val & 0xffffULL) << 16;
>          }

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson