Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QSPI node

[Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>]

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 07:10:44PM +0530, Rajesh Patil wrote:
> From: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Add QSPI DT node for SC7280 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil <rajpat@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes in V4:
>  - As per Stephen's comment updated spi-max-frequency to 37.5MHz, moved
>    qspi_opp_table from /soc to / (root).
>    
> Changes in V3:
>  - Broken the huge V2 patch into 3 smaller patches.
>    1. QSPI DT nodes
>    2. QUP wrapper_0 DT nodes
>    3. QUP wrapper_1 DT nodes
>    
> Changes in V2:
>  - As per Doug's comments removed pinmux/pinconf subnodes.
>  - As per Doug's comments split of SPI, UART nodes has been done.
>  - Moved QSPI node before aps_smmu as per the order.
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts | 27 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi    | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
> index 73225e3..b0bfd8e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
> @@ -269,6 +269,20 @@
>  		};
>  };
>  
> +&qspi {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&qspi_clk>, <&qspi_cs0>, <&qspi_data01>;
> +
> +	flash@0 {
> +		compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> +		reg = <0>;
> +		spi-max-frequency = <37500000>;
> +		spi-tx-bus-width = <2>;
> +		spi-rx-bus-width = <2>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
>  &qupv3_id_0 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
> @@ -346,6 +360,19 @@
>  
>  /* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7280.dtsi */
>  
> +&qspi_cs0 {
> +	bias-disable;
> +};
> +
> +&qspi_clk {
> +	bias-disable;
> +};
> +
> +&qspi_data01 {
> +	/* High-Z when no transfers; nice to park the lines */
> +	bias-pull-up;
> +};
> +

This configures the SPI flash of the SC7280 IDP board, which is neither
mentioned in the subject nor the body of the commit message. IMO this
should be split out into a separate patch.