On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:59:15AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:41:12PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > No functional change in this patch. > > The new name does not match how you describe "primary domain index" in > the documentation from patch 6/6. There it comes from the values in > associativity-reference-points, but here it simply comes from the > lengths of all the associativity properties. No, sorry, I misread this code... misled by the old name, so it's a good thing you're changing it. But.. I'm still not sure the new name is accurate, either... [snip] > > if (form1_affinity) { > > - depth = of_read_number(distance_ref_points, 1); > > + index = of_read_number(distance_ref_points, 1); AFACIT distance_ref_points hasn't been altered from the of_get_property() at this point, so isn't this setting depth / index to the number of entries in ref-points, rather than the value of the first entry (which is what primary domain index is supposed to be). > > } else { > > if (distance_ref_points_depth < 2) { > > printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA: " > > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int __init find_min_common_depth(void) > > goto err; > > } > > > > - depth = of_read_number(&distance_ref_points[1], 1); > > + index = of_read_number(&distance_ref_points[1], 1); > > } > > > > /* > > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int __init find_min_common_depth(void) > > } > > > > of_node_put(root); > > - return depth; > > + return index; > > > > err: > > of_node_put(root); > > @@ -437,16 +437,16 @@ int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struct drmem_lmb *lmb) > > int nid = default_nid; > > int rc, index; > > > > - if ((min_common_depth < 0) || !numa_enabled) > > + if ((primary_domain_index < 0) || !numa_enabled) > > return default_nid; > > > > rc = of_get_assoc_arrays(&aa); > > if (rc) > > return default_nid; > > > > - if (min_common_depth <= aa.array_sz && > > + if (primary_domain_index <= aa.array_sz && > > !(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_AI_INVALID) && lmb->aa_index < aa.n_arrays) { > > - index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + min_common_depth - 1; > > + index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + primary_domain_index - 1; > > nid = of_read_number(&aa.arrays[index], 1); > > > > if (nid == 0xffff || nid >= nr_node_ids) > > @@ -708,18 +708,18 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void) > > return -1; > > } > > > > - min_common_depth = find_min_common_depth(); > > + primary_domain_index = find_primary_domain_index(); > > > > - if (min_common_depth < 0) { > > + if (primary_domain_index < 0) { > > /* > > - * if we fail to parse min_common_depth from device tree > > + * if we fail to parse primary_domain_index from device tree > > * mark the numa disabled, boot with numa disabled. > > */ > > numa_enabled = false; > > - return min_common_depth; > > + return primary_domain_index; > > } > > > > - dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", min_common_depth); > > + dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", primary_domain_index); > > > > /* > > * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP > > @@ -919,14 +919,14 @@ static void __init find_possible_nodes(void) > > goto out; > > } > > > > - max_nodes = of_read_number(&domains[min_common_depth], 1); > > + max_nodes = of_read_number(&domains[primary_domain_index], 1); > > for (i = 0; i < max_nodes; i++) { > > if (!node_possible(i)) > > node_set(i, node_possible_map); > > } > > > > prop_length /= sizeof(int); > > - if (prop_length > min_common_depth + 2) > > + if (prop_length > primary_domain_index + 2) > > coregroup_enabled = 1; > > > > out: > > @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu) > > goto out; > > > > index = of_read_number(associativity, 1); > > - if (index > min_common_depth + 1) > > + if (index > primary_domain_index + 1) > > return of_read_number(&associativity[index - 1], 1); > > > > out: > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson