From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] msgget03: don't depend on existed shared resources
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:11:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPqx7si/bvK3alWj@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPlsVD2gbIiX8JJk@yuki>
Hi Cyril, all,
> Hi!
> > > I think that we allready discussed this in another thread:
> > > https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-July/023831.html
> > Thanks, I forgot this. In that case my approach (not using <=, but count
> > segments in /proc/sysvipc/shm before testing) might be more precise.
> > But no strong feeling about that, both solutions fix the test, let's chose one
> > and merge.
> As I said previously, there are many SysV IPC tests that do expect that
> nobody will add/remove IPC shm/queue/semaphores during the testrun and
> some of the testcases cannot even be implemented without this
> expectation.
> Hence I wouldn't complicate the test here and just count how many
> segments are there at the start and be done with it.
Yes, that's what's done in "my approach" [1].
Kind regards,
Petr
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20210722073523.5099-1-pvorel@suse.cz/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-23 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-12 7:52 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] shmget03: don't depend on existed shared resources Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-12 7:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] msgget03: " Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-22 7:55 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-22 12:14 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-07-22 13:01 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-22 13:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-07-23 8:46 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-23 12:24 ` Petr Vorel
2021-07-27 5:51 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-08-04 1:45 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-08-04 14:48 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-08-04 15:45 ` Petr Vorel
2021-08-05 3:43 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-08-05 6:36 ` Petr Vorel
2021-08-05 6:58 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-23 12:11 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-07-12 8:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] shmget03: " Li Wang
2021-07-12 8:37 ` Alexey Kodanev
2021-07-12 8:42 ` Li Wang
2021-07-12 8:55 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPqx7si/bvK3alWj@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.