From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AC9C4338F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBED660F58 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:25:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CBED660F58 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GZNvh1WXSz30MC for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:25:52 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=i8uKxObj; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=IZ6obNLt; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=66.111.4.28; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=i8uKxObj; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=IZ6obNLt; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GZNv66zYHz300b for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:25:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA855C013E; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 02:25:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 02:25:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=+01I+XBSZfuwy9ZAGL988jRcxro /HLPgmFme4734QqI=; b=i8uKxObjEnj3XXV5q4HPclqmdTjvvILMq812rWV9oqk 3h6eDIcLCTxzpcFfhCeugj0gl0ayKYi6xTtMpYLuY5LZXz4sndz4382dmxWqWW+G YFCcs6UA35ALIzdFn5gCjsrGwKj1MzDrSP38tM/JupIdy3UJg2syWLgrAQsSxjUs sr7d0ECGMc3lcGQwDvVI0w66zMI003kaM1bdutFABUEQWoXBvClIehbqMRDaPLJu G8rd5154U7UsyhEA/qnwSXr6yWYrrJ/T5dcvvVZFyR1LZplu5p3eK+g5q813gC6c 9K+k5CWTW4Bphwu4aCUxyak6zsfSVf5e4LWuZMtV/eQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=+01I+X BSZfuwy9ZAGL988jRcxro/HLPgmFme4734QqI=; b=IZ6obNLtPEQFckWc0v8KlL SCq1dQQQ/PehTZ4zZmbNp2TeUa+Y0rKG6MXMlXCq+QBr2Fnw9KoFxAT3waUiz9aZ uZnyt3aokhrgcoOsFXzp3G0qAGSbx8ZCAUyrMRFxK073/Eqbw04LJUrwNndKg7v/ l3QqvPz3v2FYT3d4ykSq4zN/mVsRJcKcNiNqGgZycXxdj/Vqs+ys3e7bPOWwby+i JYFKP78+baNyFO6ftNEZwlSAxpdx4hmrnNQ/x8nJuhWgv2z6Rr/4CWFTOSlKXigk MQL4IK1sp7PuOmLtH4adJvmbLdpRfT7Lj3QNMzsxvkiV5g26ecFN1MJ3c+4lY3hQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrgeekgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghksehsth iftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegheehfeffgeekveehtdfhgfduhfeg fefgtdehhfektdelffevkefgueffhedtieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprghtrhhitghksehsthiftgigrdighiii X-ME-Proxy:

Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 02:25:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:25:17 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Andrew Jeffery Subject: Re: `phosphor-logging` APIs (RFC) Message-ID: References: <41a334dd-56c4-44d0-b8f4-7ecdf5bfa5de@www.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kTDBvpcOD7qrp4oi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41a334dd-56c4-44d0-b8f4-7ecdf5bfa5de@www.fastmail.com> X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: OpenBMC List Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --kTDBvpcOD7qrp4oi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 03:22:43PM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, at 05:54, Patrick Williams wrote: > - Source location data is invalid (issue openbmc/openbmc#2207). >=20 > I think you wanted openbmc/openbmc#2297 there, but yes! Indeed, that's the issue I meant to refer to. Seems I mentioned it correct= ly in the commit. > > - Useful data is missing from `journalctl` resulting in people work= ing > > around it by generating strings with `fmt` et.al. >=20 > Sounds promising! Reading the proposal it seems like you're appending=20 > certain bits of structured data to the message. I think it would be=20 > nice if the data could be interpolated into arbitrary positions and not= =20 > just appended (note, I'm not asking for interpolation of arbitrary=20 > variables here unlike what can be achieved with raw use of fmt, only=20 > those captured via the structured logging). Can you give me a concrete example of what you mean by this? I'm not understanding. > Andrew --=20 Patrick Williams --kTDBvpcOD7qrp4oi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAmEA+EsACgkQqwNHzC0A wRkeXw/+PGLCPeVhMzp5ZYFEIAxxY/gM50RN575+BtnJsf9i0Uplv0ggwiuJm7Go dPAQQltkFvSOsTsYGWcInJHemcn7ILLt+xDsmTOcZajWtkQOUG0FiGCFj4kshkST Xlb26RysujZCtGCQ1yhHrsfPul09q1oFLiALhrmZD1nYXhlj5Ve0SfvSRLQuw3mx nAl7DEjdbLtjAY/uXQ2QTXunuirNdTZs9MIZYeUH7mANAwiLbB/ZWKz+OF0gLayk vrzLvYf+Vzxhq1vhq4x+ESYepWJ+UEdCSVjckt7II2G1SA1pMIhx6zunEXZl9sqP AmOeFdHE7i8PFpYNjW6xvmtcaqEcDbDjpc6nvassl/GEuAq7u0Oaw4axgJCnhMes KMD62De3U4u+PBTile2xpdXxf90NyR6bK5fcvHBCrH43trvaFSzOt+OxxJ7ybZyH MpzdnOH6wZeP5jPrvOVUI1qGxlq3zgoS6sRVHcQxxW2GkU/H0CeAKf+wIDsfQft+ jIwvU9NETvWTAjBV4oTG47dE0qcf24raoRrUVzD1SDP+H5Q2h4A3sCypSx3CjcmZ qI20TNcUnms2sBCoMrlIzU6tRXjT9wwpxRrEp3GFOGpEZdtep9eoJLUGpv90ALGC sikiGQfO3bokHgSdkCpt94jLpzPYARtR8td5BxZ/72S9QrsclvQ= =awPf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kTDBvpcOD7qrp4oi--