From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C03FC432BE for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D6461208 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238124AbhHOPgc (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2021 11:36:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39796 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229603AbhHOPga (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2021 11:36:30 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2132CC061764; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=eYSk1CsSbdU6TZDzwzr/5Rga7dzOhjq06uCI72Yt8v8=; b=B6xaQgGxdCdoXNp3KRyPOxnERh C/7Lg4rqNcC1kw99i4ixF4K5FBcTzxKmL64L9VVAbhDlrclSCeml39NQUuzmTYLqOBycvaEhvuj3f Lpe3EZD/E27F623ENZ9pQe5q3qaRDcgPVN+g/QE61zunyNWJjEz4r5BHLfkHZObtsSm45Frf65NJs TQcdUo8QCldl6iyH4L9+OCavA7eAR8jmH1pofQlxHYMxI1Fv0Dp8tsKoGm2fQw1QDFSAEvIgRu41H 703a0TmBGOqbvT6oz3RKQ50/X81kDalORq05dqUwZheQsNKZEP9gXnbMCWmcHIRUXrxOhII9Z7x3f W33x5Arg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mFIAr-000OO9-Kb; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:35:49 +0000 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 16:35:45 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 076/138] mm/writeback: Add folio_redirty_for_writepage() Message-ID: References: <20210715033704.692967-1-willy@infradead.org> <20210715033704.692967-77-willy@infradead.org> <249863ea-8b4b-df38-545a-5f083502270d@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <249863ea-8b4b-df38-545a-5f083502270d@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:30:51PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > +/** > > + * folio_redirty_for_writepage - Decline to write a dirty folio. > > + * @wbc: The writeback control. > > + * @folio: The folio. > > + * > > + * When a writepage implementation decides that it doesn't want to write > > + * @folio for some reason, it should call this function, unlock @folio and > > + * return 0. > > s/0/false ... no? This sentence describes what a writepage implementation should do, and writepage returns an int, not bool.